I have to agree that the first debate seemed the better of the two, if you want to call it a debate. More like a question and answer session to get to know a candidate. I thought the second debate started out really well, and got folks fired up. Then it turned into witty comments, where Huckabee and Carson won out, and Walker tweaked the funny bone a bit with his legitimate comment hinting that the Chinese and Russians probably know more about Hillary's email than congress. All in all, it was a couple hours entertainment. I didn't miss any of my shows, since I have a DVR.

Like the little kid told the preacher when exiting the church after the service, having proudly placed his twenty five cents in the offering plate. "Pretty good show for a quarter." I got my quarter's worth.

I am really anticipating a good show in the Democrat debate where we will get to watch Hillary debate Hillary. Wonder which one will win, the old sea hag or the new "re-defined" Hillary? Aw heck "what difference does it make."

I really do enjoy listening/reading the Clinton die hards jump on anything regarding/relating Fiorina.

Their worst nightmare is to have another female on the ticket thus neutralizing what they think they have as an advantage.

Fiorina looks the camera in the face...Clinton does not unless scripted, staged and directed when to do what.

Fiorina dresses like an executive feamle who takes pride in how she looks....Clinton doesn't know how to or just doesn't care.

Fiorina says what she means....Clinton says what the audience wants to hear (sometimes).

Fiorina has is honest and forthright...Clinton is a liar, untrustworthy and unethical.

Fiorina is feminine....Clinton is........tired!

I wouldn't worry about a Fiorina/Clinton debate. Clinton for sure will not be there.

Still waiting for the poster in post 10, to supply the source for the quotation given.

I asked for this in post 13, and it is required by TOTV regulations or

Can we simply make things up, put them in quotation marks to make them seem authentic ?

I think it is vital to integrity.

Not saying there is no link, but if I know simply making things up and posting them is ok...well, it is not obviously it is not only a violation of TOTV regs, but of US LAW.

Since we have the guest monikers, we cannot tell who the poster is but sure hope she will...oops...he/she will follow the law.

Originally Posted by Guest

Still waiting for the poster in post 10, to supply the source for the quotation given.

I asked for this in post 13, and it is required by TOTV regulations or

Can we simply make things up, put them in quotation marks to make them seem authentic ?

I think it is vital to integrity.

Not saying there is no link, but if I know simply making things up and posting them is ok...well, it is not obviously it is not only a violation of TOTV regs, but of US LAW.

Since we have the guest monikers, we cannot tell who the poster is but sure hope she will...oops...he/she will follow the law.

I empathize with your concern over the liberal interest and slurs from the poster. However, there are several such quotes available from the liberal media supporting that slight on her resume'. What they don't include, out of fear(or pointed disregard) is the circumstances surrounding the firing and the stock market standings of other big businesses during that time period.

This is what I have been waiting for and hoped for when she ran in California. I wanted to see her pitted against Hillary in a one on one. Hillary will have to pull out all her black magic witchcraft to get the upper hand on Fiorina. Fiorina is a force that many of the veteran politicians on stage better be wary of. Liberals won't know what to do if they can't use the sexist term during the campaign. Up to now, I have favored Kasich, but I would gladly vote for her if I think she can win.

Originally Posted by Guest

I really do enjoy listening/reading the Clinton die hards jump on anything regarding/relating Fiorina.

Their worst nightmare is to have another female on the ticket thus neutralizing what they think they have as an advantage.

Fiorina looks the camera in the face...Clinton does not unless scripted, staged and directed when to do what.

Fiorina dresses like an executive feamle who takes pride in how she looks....Clinton doesn't know how to or just doesn't care.

Fiorina says what she means....Clinton says what the audience wants to hear (sometimes).

Fiorina has is honest and forthright...Clinton is a liar, untrustworthy and unethical.

Fiorina is feminine....Clinton is........tired!

I wouldn't worry about a Fiorina/Clinton debate. Clinton for sure will not be there.

Originally Posted by Guest

I empathize with your concern over the liberal interest and slurs from the poster. However, there are several such quotes available from the liberal media supporting that slight on her resume'. What they don't include, out of fear(or pointed disregard) is the circumstances surrounding the firing and the stock market standings of other big businesses during that time period.

This is what I have been waiting for and hoped for when she ran in California. I wanted to see her pitted against Hillary in a one on one. Hillary will have to pull out all her black magic witchcraft to get the upper hand on Fiorina. Fiorina is a force that many of the veteran politicians on stage better be wary of. Liberals won't know what to do if they can't use the sexist term during the campaign. Up to now, I have favored Kasich, but I would gladly vote for her if I think she can win.

I understand what you are saying totally !!

My concern, and frankly those who read this forum more more than entertainment value or juvenile entertainment should be concerned about posters using quotes without a link.

If that is allowed, you can simply make things up to support whatever you want and put it in quotes with no link. Now their is not context or even the simplest of idea if it is even true.

It also violates TOTV rules.

To me every poster should be on guard and if in fact the ADMIN even looks at political, THIS TOPIC and instance should be taken very seriously.

I will certainly not even consider a post with a statement attributed to someone with no links. Even if not in quotes, if a poster says someone said something I will investigate before responding, thus I hope ADMIN who knows who posts by IP address will address this matter with that poster.

Fiorina certainly put Chris Matthews in his place today. Wow, she is sharp!

Originally Posted by Guest

Fiorina certainly put Chris Matthews in his place today. Wow, she is sharp!

She certainly is. After all, anyone who can render him speechless is a force to be reckoned with..........Go Carly!!

If she doesn't get the nomination, I could definitely see her as VP or in a cabinet position. What a breath of fresh air!

Originally Posted by Guest

She certainly is. After all, anyone who can render him speechless is a force to be reckoned with..........Go Carly!!

If she doesn't get the nomination, I could definitely see her as VP or in a cabinet position. What a breath of fresh air!

What a real female candidate looks and acts like!

Can you imagine a Fiorina/Rubio ticket? How would Hillary manage her rhetoric? She'd be hard pressed to hit on minority issues and hard to use the sexist card. What a conundrum.

Originally Posted by Guest

What a real female candidate looks and acts like!

I really do not think she will get the nomination but you have to imagine her and MS Clinton on the same stage together debating.

Just the vision of that is compelling and then taking down the old tired talking points that MS Clinton, at least thus far, is throwing out.

Originally Posted by Guest

I really do not think she will get the nomination but you have to imagine her and MS Clinton on the same stage together debating.

Just the vision of that is compelling and then taking down the old tired talking points that MS Clinton, at least thus far, is throwing out.

It would be a very classy take down, with Fiorina coming out on top of course. Yes, I would love to see that one!