Originally Posted by Guest

So by your logic, Obama is responsible for the rise of ISIS, the deaths in Benghazi, the IRS and Secret Service scandals, the Fast and Furious gun running scandal, and the list goes on. Or does your selective logic only apply to Republicans?

The president has taken responsibility for the four deaths in Benghazi, as opposed to W Bush never taking responsibility for the hundreds of thousands of deaths in Iraq.

Our president is only sworn to protect this country. He cannot keep the whole world safe.

What is scary is Jeb Bush said in a speech this week, that he gets all his mid-east and foreign policy advice from his brother George.

Originally Posted by Guest

The stock market is driven by earnings. Check with your financial advisor to verify.

Dear Guest:

WOW! your response reflects that you are way over your head and out of touch as to the artificial boost the Fed has given the stock market . The uncertainty with the Fed and the pages and pages of regulations enacted over the past 6.5 years have hand tied companies despite the fact that many are sitting on a surplus Its one reason you are seeing so many mergers.

Personal Best Regards:

I can't believe there are still some who have the nerve to refer to the faltering economy as the fault of Bush or anybody else who is not been in office. Obama has had the reins for the last 6.5 years.

How about enlightening us as to the actions taken and results achieved by Obama and his administration that has done anything to improve the economy.

And please don't insult our intelligence by citing again, the state of the stock market as an Obama achievement.

In the unlikely event the democrats win in 2016 who will the president elect have to blame when he/she/it takes office?

No insulting economic evidence from the stock market. Just jobs, unemployment, corporate profits, consumer confidence. Fairly standard measures of how the economy is doing.

Originally Posted by Guest

No insulting economic evidence from the stock market. Just jobs, unemployment, corporate profits, consumer confidence. Fairly standard measures of how the economy is doing.

Good post, but you shouldn't try to confuse the hard right-wing with too many facts at one time.

Originally Posted by Guest

Good post, but you shouldn't try to confuse the hard right-wing with too many facts at one time.

No name calling would be approaching speechlessness.

Your mind is made up and facts apparently don't matter to you. This discussion is over because I don't debate with 2-year olds.

Originally Posted by Guest

All one has to know is who was sitting in the oval office when the financial collapse occurred, you know, the 'buck stops here' stuff. It was W Bush, no matter how you try to whitewash the facts.

The same W Bush who did nothing to prevent 9/11, the same W Bush who went to war with the wrong country, the same W Bush who oversaw the Katrina disaster.

Now by gosh, we get to pick another Bush and hope for different results. That would definitely be the definition of insanity.

Only partially. It is more complicated than that. Check with someone who actually knows something.

Originally Posted by Guest

The stock market is driven by earnings. Check with your financial advisor to verify.

Originally Posted by Guest

Your mind is made up and facts apparently don't matter to you. This discussion is over because I don't debate with 2-year olds.

Another intelligent well-researched reply, but not one word defending W Bush, or the heir apparent Jeb, or any of the other GOP candidates or their records. Enough said.

Ridiculous pretend discourse....again.

Originally Posted by Guest

All one has to know is who was sitting in the oval office when the financial collapse occurred, you know, the 'buck stops here' stuff. It was W Bush, no matter how you try to whitewash the facts.

The same W Bush who did nothing to prevent 9/11, the same W Bush who went to war with the wrong country, the same W Bush who oversaw the Katrina disaster.

Now by gosh, we get to pick another Bush and hope for different results. That would definitely be the definition of insanity.

Wow, looks like your Kool Aid is 100 proof

What part of "I don't debate with 2-year olds" did you not understand?

Originally Posted by Guest

Another intelligent well-researched reply, but not one word defending W Bush, or the heir apparent Jeb, or any of the other GOP candidates or their records. Enough said.

Originally Posted by Guest

What part of "I don't debate with 2-year olds" did you not understand?

...and one of the few remaining Gang of Six replies with ridicule and absolutely no substance.

I have no idea what you are talking about. Please take your meds.

Originally Posted by Guest

...and one of the few remaining Gang of Six replies with ridicule and absolutely no substance.