Originally Posted by Guest

Tell tale signs of a waste of time thread.

Point us in the right direction. Save the thread.

Originally Posted by Guest

Point us in the right direction. Save the thread.

Start here:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...ing-the-truth/

"I think I understand why she answered the way she did. She knows she has been in public life for a long time and that she has said lots and lots of things. Because of that, it's possible that at some point in the future, someone will unearth a statement in which it could be construed that she wasn't telling the whole truth. Clinton is protecting against the damage incurred by such a revelation."

Hillary is not perfect? Is that where you want this to go? I agree. You are looking for a candidate who's honesty and character cannot be challenged.

Who do you think fits that description?

Originally Posted by Guest

"I think I understand why she answered the way she did. She knows she has been in public life for a long time and that she has said lots and lots of things. Because of that, it's possible that at some point in the future, someone will unearth a statement in which it could be construed that she wasn't telling the whole truth. Clinton is protecting against the damage incurred by such a revelation."

Hillary is not perfect? Is that where you want this to go? I agree. You are looking for a candidate who's honesty and character cannot be challenged.

Who do you think fits that description?

Well, Clinton does NOT come close. But, for some reason the public believes her lies to the extent that they gullibly support her candidacy. It's a shame because anything she does wrong, she blames on a Republican conspiracy to dethrone her and defame her. And the gullible supporters believe her. More Obama style smoke and mirrors.