Originally Posted by Guest

This situation is just the beginning of an assault on religious freedom. the standard defense is going to be its your job follow the rules follow my orders...that's what many of the Nazi said when they were tried.

The Supreme court activist have opened a pandora's box unnecessarily

I support the county clerk

...and you are legally WRONG. Would you support the county clerk if it meant YOU had to go to jail? Be honest with your answer.

She had legal options. Once this became law, she could have protested. She could have resigned. She could not refuse to issue a marriage certificate to a gay couple. Once upon a time, miscegenation was illegal and court clerks refused to issue licenses to mixed-race couples even when miscegenation was declared illegal. The clerks got away with it. This time around, the Feds have more power and can do something to enforce the law. Ms. Davis and her ilk need to either do their job or resign. If they refuse to follow the law, they should be prosecuted and treated as the lawbreakers they are.

There is an old country song goes something like this (you have to stand for something or you fall for anything) If its that big a of deal they should just fire her and fight the discharge later. No jail time.

Ah now the real truth of the matter is beginning to surface. The state legislature is proposing changing the laws that would make them more in step with the supreme courts decision.

And all the super smart politicians and lawyers and judges did not know the supreme court ruling was in fact counter to many KY laws on the books??

In practical application the KY laws on the books do not allow for same gender situations.
So this whole episode could have been an issue of "ENFORCING THE EXISTING LAWS" and not another race/gender/political-media circus.

Special interest/minority groups in conjunction with the 24/7 media are the ruination of our beloved country.

Originally Posted by Guest

There is an old country song goes something like this (you have to stand for something or you fall for anything) If its that big a of deal they should just fire her and fight the discharge later. No jail time.

Kim Davis cannot be fired as she is an elected official. Jail time for contempt of court is the solution. People have to learn consequences if they openly break the law.

Originally Posted by Guest

Kim Davis cannot be fired as she is an elected official. Jail time for contempt of court is the solution. People have to learn consequences if they openly break the law.

Instead of creating another gender media circus she could have cited the laws of KY did not support issuing the certificates. But then that would have not had the sensationalism, agenda promoting media frenzy, would it?

Originally Posted by Guest

Ah now the real truth of the matter is beginning to surface. The state legislature is proposing changing the laws that would make them more in step with the supreme courts decision.

And all the super smart politicians and lawyers and judges did not know the supreme court ruling was in fact counter to many KY laws on the books??

In practical application the KY laws on the books do not allow for same gender situations.
So this whole episode could have been an issue of "ENFORCING THE EXISTING LAWS" and not another race/gender/political-media circus.

Special interest/minority groups in conjunction with the 24/7 media are the ruination of our beloved country.

However, when the Supreme Court decision was handed down, the Kentucky state laws against same sex marriage all became invalid. There were no "existing" laws to enorce.

Originally Posted by Guest

So if I robbed you and said that it was within my religious rights and to heck with the law, you wouldn't prosecute?

We cannot live in a lawless society, even if you do not accept the authority.

A marriage license is a non religious issue. A religion or church has every right not to married a same-sex couple. That is their freedom, and it is not challenged here.

Since the Feds don't believe in enforcing the immigration laws, we can pick and chose the laws that fit us, right? Az found that out, didn't they?

Originally Posted by Guest

However, when the Supreme Court decision was handed down, the Kentucky state laws against same sex marriage all became invalid. There were no "existing" laws to enorce.

Then why is the KY legislature claiming that is the issue, and requesting getting the laws changed?
To the question posed earlier why did not the lawers, judges and law makers address the issue.

It is nothing more than a contrived special interest, media exploitation.

Married husband #1
Fathered twins with husband #3
Divorced husband #1
Married husband #2
Husband #2 adopts her kids
Divorced husband #2
Married husband #3
Divorced husband #3
Remarried husband #2

And she is a defender of the traditional Biblical marriage?

Originally Posted by Guest

Married husband #1
Fathered twins with husband #3
Divorced husband #1
Married husband #2
Husband #2 adopts her kids
Divorced husband #2
Married husband #3
Divorced husband #3
Remarried husband #2

And she is a defender of the traditional Biblical marriage?

Sounds like a perfect example of a Kentucky hillbilly.

Originally Posted by Guest

Married husband #1
Fathered twins with husband #3
Divorced husband #1
Married husband #2
Husband #2 adopts her kids
Divorced husband #2
Married husband #3
Divorced husband #3
Remarried husband #2

And she is a defender of the traditional Biblical marriage?

You can always count on certain posters to go for the personal attack instead of the issue being discussed.

WHAT does any of this have to do with the issue of discussion ?

If it is pertinent, then please present your personal resume for us to judge your ability to have an opinion.

Judging others is easy, isnt it ? Especially if it fits your political feelings.

Originally Posted by Guest

Sounds like a perfect example of a Kentucky hillbilly.

You don't have to get racist about it. That is just like calling a black the N-word

Originally Posted by Guest

Married husband #1
Fathered twins with husband #3
Divorced husband #1
Married husband #2
Husband #2 adopts her kids
Divorced husband #2
Married husband #3
Divorced husband #3
Remarried husband #2

And she is a defender of the traditional Biblical marriage?

Are not all relions frought with hypocritic members. Who like the current administration use the selective fit rules of law and enforcement or not.

And if the message is on agenda point it does not matter one bit what the person did or did not do....kinda Clinton-like measurement.

Originally Posted by Guest

Married husband #1
Fathered twins with husband #3
Divorced husband #1
Married husband #2
Husband #2 adopts her kids
Divorced husband #2
Married husband #3
Divorced husband #3
Remarried husband #2

And she is a defender of the traditional Biblical marriage?

Your post is an excellent example of what liberals always do ... trash any woman who violates liberal precepts of any type. You would have made a good candidate for Hillary's Bimbo Eruption Unit ... the real war on women.

btw, Kim converted to Christianity after having made a hash of her life ...that's the basic idea of forgiveness. Hmm, maybe there's hope for Hillary after all ... especially after she's indicted?