Hillary and Podesta are both recipients of Russia's funding. Obama knows this and is complicit in their Russian relationship. Check Obama's finances. Follow the money. The left is as corrupt as it gets. The left continues to ignore the real evidence in order to focus their slight of hand toward Trump for the next election. They have nothing to encourage anyone to vote for them, so they throw lots of cr@p at the wall, hoping something will stick long enough to get someone elected.

if you don business in foreign countries wouldn't you have lawyers that know the laws in that country?

Originally Posted by guest

if you don business in foreign countries wouldn't you have lawyers that know the laws in that country?

"bingo"

Originally Posted by guest

hillary and podesta are both recipients of russia's funding. Obama knows this and is complicit in their russian relationship. Check obama's finances. Follow the money. The left is as corrupt as it gets. The left continues to ignore the real evidence in order to focus their slight of hand toward trump for the next election. They have nothing to encourage anyone to vote for them, so they throw lots of cr@p at the wall, hoping something will stick long enough to get someone elected.

ONLYWAYICANARGUE.png

You can't defend Obamma, Clinton, or Podesta...so you whine that Trump might be similar...

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Guest

Hillary and Podesta are both recipients of Russia's funding. Obama knows this and is complicit in their Russian relationship. Check Obama's finances. Follow the money. The left is as corrupt as it gets. The left continues to ignore the real evidence in order to focus their slight of hand toward Trump for the next election. They have nothing to encourage anyone to vote for them, so they throw lots of cr@p at the wall, hoping something will stick long enough to get someone elected.

This is total crap that you throw against the wall almost every week. I have linked you to a number of fact checkers on all you and Trumps claims......

ALL of them are sheer bunk and have clearly been totally proven wrong....for example, the board that Podesta served on was and AMERICAN company, not Russian.

I might add also that the election is over and your energies, if you wish to use them here, should be placed on talking about TRUMP....he is the President now, and in the first 120 days or so has so many investigations going, and has fired THREE justice dept employees who were investigating HIM, AND they are not going away. The laundering of Russian money actually has now resurfaced.

"The Senate Intelligence Committee has requested information about President Donald Trump and his top aides from a financial intelligence unit in the Treasury Department.
The agency, known as FinCEN, imposed a $10 million civil penalty on Trump Taj Mahal in 2015 for multiple violations of money-laundering laws."




http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/10/russi...og-agency.html

This is from May 10 and he had originally avoided this by firing the US attorney for Manhattan before he could complete the investigation.

But bottom line is that the election is over and not sure what your totally false and proven false claims about Clinton or Podesta are being used for....maybe just fun and games but easily non validated Fact-checking Donald Trump’s tweets about Hillary Clinton and Russia | PolitiFact

If you are going to be a loyalist of Trump you should concentrate on what is happening about him not the election from last November.

Wait, before closing this thread, we need to know something about Trump's lawyer. What color is his hair and does he have it styled differently? What tone is his skin? Is it orange, brown or yellow? What does his wife look like and what did she do in her past? Does he believe in God? Is he wealthy? These are all pertinent, need to know details that every LIBTARD demands answers to.

Originally Posted by Guest

Wait, before closing this thread, we need to know something about Trump's lawyer. What color is his hair and does he have it styled differently? What tone is his skin? Is it orange, brown or yellow? What does his wife look like and what did she do in her past? Does he believe in God? Is he wealthy? These are all pertinent, need to know details that every LIBTARD demands answers to.

It's funny how it works that way.

It's funny how they want equality...but REFUSE to take ALL racial, sex, ethnicity identifiers out of application processes. Like applying for a job or for a university...etc. Why? NONE of them would get hired.