The title of the thread is "Let's Define A Good Presidential Candidate".

The definition is "a Female Democratic candidate named Hillary Clinton".

'Nuff said.

Originally Posted by Guest

The title of the thread is "Let's Define A Good Presidential Candidate".

The definition is "a Female Democratic candidate named Hillary Clinton".

'Nuff said.

You misunderstood the title. It was not referring to the perfect criminal candidate. Unless you subscribe to a criminal dictatorship such as a third world banana republic type nation. But, I guess if you hate the police and hate the military, you would probably subscribe to a criminal leader.

Originally Posted by Guest

The title of the thread is "Let's Define A Good Presidential Candidate".

The definition is "a Female Democratic candidate named Hillary Clinton".

'Nuff said.

Like it.

It is no use defining a good presidential candidate because there is no perfect recipe. Conservatives want an honest candidate and the liberals would prefer devious and dishonest. A conservative would want someone that is not going to spend us into debt, and the liberal perfers to play now and pay later....preferably when their kids can pay it back for them, or steal the money from those that are better than them to pay their way. A conservative will be morally and ethically motivated, whereas a liberal is free from such restrictions. A conservative will be loyal to the people and those that serve us, and the liberal will challenge every motive of anyone that doesn't conform to their standards, preferring others to fight their battles for them and to protect them.

So, all the traits that conservatives prefer are just restrictions and negatives to a liberal.

Originally Posted by Guest

The title of the thread is "Let's Define A Good Presidential Candidate".

The definition is "a Female Democratic candidate named Hillary Clinton".

'Nuff said.

The only good Clinton president is a deceased Clinton. Otherwise, they are just a waste of oxygen.

Originally Posted by Guest

The title of the thread is "Let's Define A Good Presidential Candidate".

The definition is "a Female Democratic candidate named Hillary Clinton".

'Nuff said.

How about we agree. You think Clinton is your candidate....with emphasis on being a female candidate. Fine. That is what you choose from what is put in front of you.

Now. If you had the chalk in your hand and could write on the board a description of the ideal candidate.....let's see what you come up with.

Don't insult us by coming back with Clinton because we know if it was yours to design....you surely would offer up a different person.

Don't be shy....get creative.

The silence is noteworthy!

I think the person with the most amount of White House Experience.

I think when Bill was elected you also got Hillary's opinion and expertise. She has been helping him think out problems for years. During his terms my houses went up in value and my union salary grew. I'm in the middle class [or was at least back then]. When Bill left we had a balanced budget and Social Security looked good. The Budget and Deficit Under Clinton

Hillary has White House experience, knows the other world leaders and how the system works. We also will have Bill's opinion and expertise. Once he left office he continued to be engaged. I think she is predictable and the other world leaders feel that way too. She has the most amount of jobs, committee memberships and experience in the government. She knows everyone on the hill and can always ask Bill, a two term President what he thinks. It's like a BOGO.

Originally Posted by Guest

I think the person with the most amount of White House Experience.

I think when Bill was elected you also got Hillary's opinion and expertise. She has been helping him think out problems for years. During his terms my houses went up in value and my union salary grew. I'm in the middle class [or was at least back then]. When Bill left we had a balanced budget and Social Security looked good. The Budget and Deficit Under Clinton

Hillary has White House experience, knows the other world leaders and how the system works. We also will have Bill's opinion and expertise. Once he left office he continued to be engaged. I think she is predictable and the other world leaders feel that way too. She has the most amount of jobs, committee memberships and experience in the government. She knows everyone on the hill and can always ask Bill, a two term President what he thinks. It's like a BOGO.

What the are you smoking and or drinking!!!

Must be the day for party jokes.
Just like Josh commenting today the successful performance of the stock market during Obama's reign.

What you have posted above and the stock market status would have happened if nobody was in the WH (pretty close to that as it is).

OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Can you prove that?

Originally Posted by Guest

What the are you smoking and or drinking!!!

Must be the day for party jokes.
Just like Josh commenting today the successful performance of the stock market during Obama's reign.

What you have posted above and the stock market status would have happened if nobody was in the WH (pretty close to that as it is).

OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yep, totally agree

"The Clinton years showed the effects of a large tax increase that Clinton pushed through in his first year, and that Republicans incorrectly claim is the "largest tax increase in history." It fell almost exclusively on upper-income taxpayers. Clinton’s fiscal 1994 budget also contained some spending restraints. An equally if not more powerful influence was the booming economy and huge gains in the stock markets, the so-called dot-com bubble, which brought in hundreds of millions in unanticipated tax revenue from taxes on capital gains and rising salaries."

Do you think this is inaccurate?

Originally Posted by Guest

So You Want to Be President: How's Your Interfaith IQ?

This is a good article above. Respect for the US Constitution and the Office of the Presidency and its revered history would be extremely important to me. A long view of what this President was trying to accomplish during his or her terms of office.

Knowledge and acceptance of the limitations placed by the US Constitution and traditions on the Office of the President.

Actions and words that could be held up as models for the younger generations of Americans.

Respect for education and open access to information.

Dear guest

Thank you for addressing the topic

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

So far the thread participants demonstrate they would rather attack and disparage each other than participate in the question and subject at hand.
Seems to be a pattern for some.

My first suggestion is the candidate shall not be a law trained, legal profession, lawyer.

Secondly the candidate shall not be a career politician (of the cronyism ilk).

The candidate should have a record of accomplishment; actually show measured and quantified accomplished as a direct result of their initiative.

A reasonable understanding of business especially accounting and finances.

The candidate must be able to demonstrate how well they have performed; promises made VS promises kept.

Just for starters.

Dear Guest:

Thank you for addressing the topic

I went back to read the topic. I clearly got it wrong. That's what happens when I read the question and read the answers. By the time I got to the last post, I forgot the question especially if it goes off topic.

I thought you were looking for qualities and experiences a president should have and if any candidate has those qualities and experiences. I was thinking that experience in the position or close to the position during good times would be most important. I should have just left it at that.