Originally Posted by Guest

More cheating by the wife, it does run in the family.

Melania Trump's Claims She Graduated From College Are About As Credible As Her Speech Last Night

She is not the candidate for President. Our current President has his college records sealed. For what reason other than he may not have graduated or his grades were so poor it would be an embarrassment to make public. Hillary is a proven liar numerous times, but as she so famously stated "so what at this point does it really matter." Hillary's First Lady, Bill, is a disbarred sexual preditor that used the Oval Office to re-define how to use a cigar and stain an aid's dress. One of her finalists for Vice President thinks she has American Indian heritage, but not really. Proven perverted, deceptive, and lying Politicians.

Originally Posted by Guest

She is not the candidate for President. Our current President has his college records sealed. For what reason other than he may not have graduated or his grades were so poor it would be an embarrassment to make public.

Just to set the record straight.

Obama’s ‘Sealed’ Records

Claims #1, 2 and 4, college records. Obama’s college records are not “sealed” by a court order, as this graphic would have you believe.

It would be illegal under federal law (the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974) for Occidental, Columbia or Harvard Law School to give any former student’s records to reporters or members of the public without that person’s specific, written permission.

Obama hasn’t released them, but neither have other presidential candidates released their college records. George W. Bush’s grades at Yale eventually became public, but only because somebody leaked them to the New Yorker magazine. Bush himself refused to release them, according to a 1999 profile in the Washington Post.

You're welcome.


CNM

In nearly 8 years plus the campaign not a single former classmate of his has been located . Undergrad or from Law School .
Doesn`t that seem just a bit strange .

Well than again you are a Leftie so it does not matter to you .

Nothing to see here ! Move along Providers and leave your life earnings for those smarter than you to distribute for votes !

Originally Posted by Guest

In nearly 8 years plus the campaign not a single former classmate of his has been located . Undergrad or from Law School .
Doesn`t that seem just a bit strange .

Well than again you are a Leftie so it does not matter to you

I almost feel guilty sometimes, eviscerating you right-wingnuts......because it is so easy to do.

Obama at Columbia University

We’re not sure why, but this false claim has been forwarded widely in recent days, judging by the number of queries we’ve received.

Barack Obama was a transfer student from California’s Occidental College when he came to Columbia University in 1981 as a 20-year-old junior. More than 20,000 students currently attend Columbia. The enrollment in the early ’80s might have been lower, but not everybody would have met or remembered Obama. And it’s absolutely untrue that "not one person has ever come forward" from his years there, or that he is "the man who wasn’t there."

Columbia University proudly claims Obama as a 1983 graduate. The university magazine Columbia College Today profiled him as far back as 2005, after he was elected to the U.S. Senate.

Last year, the New York Times wrote about Phil Boerner, who roomed with the future president during his first year at Columbia. The article included excerpts from the Columbia student directory, showing Obama living during his junior year at 142 West 109th Street near Columbia’s campus in New York City, and during his senior year at 339 East 94th Street. Boerner recalled that Obama sometimes wrapped himself in a sleeping bag to keep warm in the chilly apartment they shared, and that some nights he would cook chicken curry for dinner.

Obama is the Mystery of the Century-Fiction!

Nobody from Columbia recalls Obama – Fiction!

Obama said he was “painfully alone and really not focused on anything” during his time at Columbia from 1981-1983, the Wall Street Journal reports.

However, claims that nobody remembers the president during that time are false.

Obama’s roommate at Columbia reflected on his time living with the future president in a 2009 campus publication. Columbia has also acknowledged the president as an alumnus of the university.

Remember now, I said "almost."





CNM

So where are the tax returns????

Originally Posted by Guest

So where are the tax returns????

Same place as 30000 of Hillary's emails?

Laura Bush said in her 2004 RNC speech:

“If you’re determined and you want to work hard, you can do anything you want to. That’s the beautiful thing about America.”

Hillary Clinton spoke similarly in 2014 at the New American Foundation:

“My mother and father gave us a middle-class life with opportunities she never could have imagined for herself but which she always believed could be possible for her children. And that was a great gift that I will be forever grateful for, and then Bill and I of course worked hard to pass on those values to our daughter.”

Ann Romney’s speech was similar in 2012:

“Mitt will be the first to tell you that he is the most fortunate man in the world. He had two loving parents who gave him strong values and taught him the value of work.”

So, I guess if Melania stole someone else's work, others have also.

As for Obama, he clearly plagiarized George W. Bush’s speech in 2014 almost word for word. Yet, the same people attacking Melania Trump didn’t seem to care that he did it. Bush speechwriter: Obama plagiarized Bush - POLITICO

Indeed misrepresenting yourself is not a good thing for a number of reasons. Having spent a long time recruiting hiring and training people you would be surprised at the number of candidates that have exaggerated their education and experiences.

Melania Trump is not a candidate for anything. Melania Trump may not have completed her formal education but by her drive and experiences have allowed her to become an accomplished woman.

But the real story here is that the liberal media needed something to deflect what happened at Mondays' Republican Convention.

I watched the convention proceedings on C-Span. It obvious the liberal media did also and they needed something to deflect the testimony of truth tellers concerning Hillary Clinton's dealing in Benghazi. And so the liberal media did what "cleaners"do for the mob.

Wednesday's Convention was focused on her personal server. Attorneys General Michael Macuskey (Bush Administration) gave the most extensive analysis in the simplest of terms (great communicator) of what Hillary did, why it was wrong and how it would affect our nation.

We are a nation of laws and no one is above the law. Yet, this woman, her husband, the president, the top cop and the attorney general colluded on behalf of Hillary Clinton.

Ethical people should not stand by and applaud such behavior but here we are paying homage to these same leaders. Why have so many of us lost respect for the law and indeed our self respect?

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

Indeed misrepresenting yourself is not a good thing for a number of reasons. Having spent a long time recruiting hiring and training people you would be surprised at the number of candidates that have exaggerated their education and experiences.

Melania Trump is not a candidate for anything. Melania Trump may not have completed her formal education but by her drive and experiences have allowed her to become an accomplished woman.

But the real story here is that the liberal media needed something to deflect what happened at Mondays' Republican Convention.

I watched the convention proceedings on C-Span. It obvious the liberal media did also and they needed something to deflect the testimony of truth tellers concerning Hillary Clinton's dealing in Benghazi. And so the liberal media did what "cleaners"do for the mob.

Wednesday's Convention was focused on her personal server. Attorneys General Michael Macuskey (Bush Administration) gave the most extensive analysis in the simplest of terms (great communicator) of what Hillary did, why it was wrong and how it would affect our nation.

We are a nation of laws and no one is above the law. Yet, this woman, her husband, the president, the top cop and the attorney general colluded on behalf of Hillary Clinton.

Ethical people should not stand by and applaud such behavior but here we are paying homage to these same leaders. Why have so many of us lost respect for the law and indeed our self respect?

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

Has she been convicted of any of these "crimes".... clearly you do not understand the legal system or the laws of the United States.

You clearly are missing the point by practising what Clinton is doing by using, abusing or hiding behind the letter of the law.

Even the FBI director said she did it!!! But she deserves special handling.....meaning becuase she is a Clinton she is above the law.

So cut the high and mighty BS of convicted or not convicted to make a lying, American killing, reckless, dangerous unsophisticated phony crony appear to be an innocent.

Why do we always hear the BS of she was not convicted as opposd to being proved innocent?

Never mind. The conclusion is obvious. She was and is not and hence the legal weasel wording.

That unfortunately the uninformed and the partisan blind party first no matter who or how or what.....does not matter.

And we don't say much about politics publicly, but we are silently steaming about the mess the world is in and about the inappropriate sympathy given to people who then turn around and think it is o.k. to shoot the police. We don't say much but we are going to elect a non politician who can't seem to keep his foot out of his mouth, just like members of our own family. His wife isn't clever about writing speeches either, but we are going to begin in November clearing out the political machine that has screwed things up mightily. Then we will somehow get the attention of both political parties. Be aware of the power of silence. We will win this election. We will change this country back to being run in a common sense way.

Originally Posted by Guest

And we don't say much about politics publicly, but we are silently steaming about the mess the world is in and about the inappropriate sympathy given to people who then turn around and think it is o.k. to shoot the police. We don't say much but we are going to elect a non politician who can't seem to keep his foot out of his mouth, just like members of our own family. His wife isn't clever about writing speeches either, but we are going to begin in November clearing out the political machine that has screwed things up mightily. Then we will somehow get the attention of both political parties. Be aware of the power of silence. We will win this election. We will change this country back to being run in a common sense way.

I can get behind that...

Originally Posted by Guest

AND ABOUT AS CREDIBLE AS HILLARY`S MANY CLAIMS :

1] The Military and Ambassador died due to an offensive video !
2] I did nothing wrong with my emails
3] I was just very lucky with my investment in cattle futures and frankly I was so good at it that I got bored with it and only did it a couple of times .
4] Look ! The missing files from the Rose Law Firm just showed up at the top of my closet .
5] We were under a sniper attack when I was on the tarmac -- they were shooting at me !
6] We were dead broke when we left the Whitehouse
7] As your Senator you can count on me to bring 250,000 new jobs to Upstate NY .
8] I never said that I was going to put plenty of coal-minors and coal-companies out of business .
AND THE BEAT GOES ON AND ON AND ON NEVER STOPPING -- A NEW DAY IS JUST AN OPPORTUNITY FOR MORE LIES OUT OF HER MOUTH .

Now since you are a member of fox fair and ballanced, tell us all the trump lies.

Originally Posted by Guest

Indeed misrepresenting yourself is not a good thing for a number of reasons. Having spent a long time recruiting hiring and training people you would be surprised at the number of candidates that have exaggerated their education and experiences.

Melania Trump is not a candidate for anything. Melania Trump may not have completed her formal education but by her drive and experiences have allowed her to become an accomplished woman.

But the real story here is that the liberal media needed something to deflect what happened at Mondays' Republican Convention.

I watched the convention proceedings on C-Span. It obvious the liberal media did also and they needed something to deflect the testimony of truth tellers concerning Hillary Clinton's dealing in Benghazi. And so the liberal media did what "cleaners"do for the mob.

Wednesday's Convention was focused on her personal server. Attorneys General Michael Macuskey (Bush Administration) gave the most extensive analysis in the simplest of terms (great communicator) of what Hillary did, why it was wrong and how it would affect our nation.

We are a nation of laws and no one is above the law. Yet, this woman, her husband, the president, the top cop and the attorney general colluded on behalf of Hillary Clinton.

Ethical people should not stand by and applaud such behavior but here we are paying homage to these same leaders. Why have so many of us lost respect for the law and indeed our self respect?

Personal Best Regards:

"Melania Trump is not a candidate for anything. Melania Trump may not have completed her formal education but by her drive and experiences have allowed her to become an accomplished woman."

She spoke at a political event, she is open to scrutiny. I think plagiarism is unethical.

Her drive and experiences were posing nude for GQ and other tawdry publications, then having an affair with trump while he was married.

So in your opinion lying on biographies and resumes is okay.

You have NO credibility.

.

The company that analyzes speeches estimated about 6% of Melania speech was copied and she did not write the speech. Why is it in today's society people stoop to moral equivalencies? Wrong is wrong. Greater wrongs are by far greater than lesser wrongs

There is nothing redeeming about saying well X is worse than Y. Isn't it better for society to say we will not tolerate that kind of behavior from either X or Y?

Personal Best Regards: