[QUOTE=Guest;1206869][QUOTE=Guest;1206528][QUOTE=Guest;1206480][QUOTE=Guest;1206460][QUOTE=Guest;1206425][QUOTE=Guest;1206245][QUOTE=Guest;1206023]

Fool, there will be GOOD choices on the ballot. Bad enough you waste your vote on a corrupt "lesser of two evils", now you guarantee you've thrown it away by writing in Donald Duck. What the hell is wrong with you? Seriously, why do you REFUSE to vote for the BEST candidate?



[QUOTE=Guest;1206462]

Originally Posted by Guest

Talk to the hand...blah blah blah...nothing but garbage in your post. Nobody votes for them because they're fools. Fools like you. Vote for the lesser of two evils, play their game...slave.

Yes, yes, they say one should humor the mental cases. I pity your neighbors. Vote or don't vote. I don't care. It won't make any difference anyway. What ever satisfies you. The only difference it will make is when you come back on here and tell someone that you voted for an unknown. Otherwise, no one will know or care. Don't forget to wear your little "I voted" sticker proudly.........

Fool, there will be GOOD choices on the ballot. Bad enough you waste your vote on a corrupt "lesser of two evils", now you guarantee you've thrown it away by writing in Donald Duck. What the hell is wrong with you? Seriously, why do you REFUSE to vote for the BEST candidate

I am the fool? The fools are ones that will be putting Trump. and Clinton on the ballot. My guess is are one of those fools. All the good candidates got thrown by the waste side by fools. I vote for John Kasich. Anybody with a brain in their head, would make him the Republican nominee. When your brain is located a lot lower, you wind up with a Trump. Cruz is worse than Trump.

You have a strange definition of the word GOOD. If you think Trump, Cruz and Clinton are GOOD, seek help. Do you think that, if any one of these three gets elected, anything in DC will change? The next four years will be the last 7+ on steroids. This might pass for GOOD in your world. In the real world, it really sucks.

Maybe the rules will be changed at the Republican National Convention, and a person that didn't win eight states can be nominated. If nobody get 1,237 in the first ballot, sanity can be restored, and a person that will work with the Democrats to get things down will be the Republican nominee.

Originally Posted by Guest

Fool, there will be GOOD choices on the ballot. Bad enough you waste your vote on a corrupt "lesser of two evils", now you guarantee you've thrown it away by writing in Donald Duck. What the hell is wrong with you? Seriously, why do you REFUSE to vote for the BEST candidate

I am the fool? The fools are ones that will be putting Trump. and Clinton on the ballot. My guess is are one of those fools. All the good candidates got thrown by the waste side by fools. I vote for John Kasich. Anybody with a brain in their head, would make him the Republican nominee. When your brain is located a lot lower, you wind up with a Trump. Cruz is worse than Trump.

You have a strange definition of the word GOOD. If you think Trump, Cruz and Clinton are GOOD, seek help. Do you think that, if any one of these three gets elected, anything in DC will change? The next four years will be the last 7+ on steroids. This might pass for GOOD in your world. In the real world, it really sucks.

Maybe the rules will be changed at the Republican National Convention, and a person that didn't win eight states can be nominated. If nobody get 1,237 in the first ballot, sanity can be restored, and a person that will work with the Democrats to get things down will be the Republican nominee.

What in the last seven years makes you think that the Democrats should be given any consideration or compromise? Where did you ever see compromise in the first two years of total Democrat controlled government? Why is it that you think that voting on an issue that pushes our country the wrong way, deserves the Republicans to go in the same direction? Like Obama said, elections have consequences. The kids had total control of the car keys and did their little joy ride, so the adults had to take the keys from them. That's what happens when you act irresponsibly. You liberals seem to think that the adults should join the joy ride and not go to work. Sorry, but you lefties lost your right to have a say. It's time for YOUR side to start compromising. You had total control and your side ran amok, getting what accomplished? Obamacare. Nothing else. And Obamacare is a disaster. The right did not vote for it because they knew it was a disaster. You all complained and called us the party of "NO." The people spoke and you lost total control of congress. Obama will leave the White House in disgrace, having nothing to show for his time but a failed legacy, party and racial divide and a leaderless world in chaos.

Here is an example of Obama's version of compromise:

VIDEO: WH Censors French President Saying

Such transparancy......BS!

If he is willing to risk the wrath of real Americans by censoring what we see and hear what else is he doing that is not as discoverable.

Compromise is follow the party drum beat or he black SUV will be dispatched!!

Originally Posted by Guest

Here is an example of Obama's version of compromise:

VIDEO: WH Censors French President Saying

Such transparancy......BS!

If he is willing to risk the wrath of real Americans by censoring what we see and hear what else is he doing that is not as discoverable.

Compromise is follow the party drum beat or he black SUV will be dispatched!!

http://mediamatters.org/research/201...obama-c/209705

Conservative outlets quickly hatched a conspiracy theory that the White House "censored" French President Francois Hollande from using the phrase "Islamist terrorism" during a bilateral meeting with President Obama in Washington, D.C. The White House explained the issue was simply a technical glitch that was fixed immediately.

Always happens

Originally Posted by Guest

http://mediamatters.org/research/201...obama-c/209705

Conservative outlets quickly hatched a conspiracy theory that the White House "censored" French President Francois Hollande from using the phrase "Islamist terrorism" during a bilateral meeting with President Obama in Washington, D.C. The White House explained the issue was simply a technical glitch that was fixed immediately.

Always happens

Yes, a "technical glitch" wink, wink...........

Originally Posted by Guest

What in the last seven years makes you think that the Democrats should be given any consideration or compromise? Where did you ever see compromise in the first two years of total Democrat controlled government? Why is it that you think that voting on an issue that pushes our country the wrong way, deserves the Republicans to go in the same direction? Like Obama said, elections have consequences. The kids had total control of the car keys and did their little joy ride, so the adults had to take the keys from them. That's what happens when you act irresponsibly. You liberals seem to think that the adults should join the joy ride and not go to work. Sorry, but you lefties lost your right to have a say. It's time for YOUR side to start compromising. You had total control and your side ran amok, getting what accomplished? Obamacare. Nothing else. And Obamacare is a disaster. The right did not vote for it because they knew it was a disaster. You all complained and called us the party of "NO." The people spoke and you lost total control of congress. Obama will leave the White House in disgrace, having nothing to show for his time but a failed legacy, party and racial divide and a leaderless world in chaos.

The Democrats did not have total control in 2009, and 2010.
Did The Democrats Ever Really Have 60 Votes In The Senate, And For How Long?
They didn't have a filibuster proof Senate, and McConnell used the filibuster on just about everything. The Republicans earned the name "the party of No". McConnell is paying the price for that now, because goes around comes around. Now, the Republicans have to deal with the Democrats filibustering just about everything. Too bad, so sad!

Who is defining what is the right direction, and what is the wrong direction? Let me guess. Everything the Republicans want to do is right, and everything the Democrats want to do is wrong. That is just so obvious to everyone with a closed mind.

Obamacare is disaster. Is it? It may be a disaster in Republican control states that did everything to make sure that it failed. There are a lot of states that would disagree with the blanket statement that it is a failure. Take Obama's name of it, and it would be just fine.

How many lefties voted for John Kasich? I am a registered Republican.

Do you remember this statement by a Republican congressman, "give us everything that we want, and we will call that a compromise." Is this the compromise that Democrats should strive for getting everything they want? I am sure they will have no problem with that definition of compromise. If you have noticed, and by your comment you haven't, compromise is a swear word in DC. Republicans keep on throwing Reagan's name out there as a shining example of their party. Reagan worked with Tip O'Neil to get things done. This must have been one of Reagan's short comings.

The people spoke, and so did Gerrymandering. What happened in DC? Not a damn thing. So, they are speaking again with Trump. If the Republicans put Trump as their nominee, they could very well say goodbye to the Senate. Speaking and not listening seems to be bridge to far for the Republicans.

Obama legacy will be just fine. The Congress, and the Senate in his term will be a whole different matter.