Originally Posted by Guest

I would suppose, if they ask, with the same sensitivity we will use explaining a question they WILL ask, that being.....how could an elected sitting President of our country have sex, adulteress sex, with a woman inside that supposedly revered Oval Office. Or how he could be sued while President for having adulteress sex while a sitting Governor with another woman.

I suspect the question on our President will be asked many more times than that about the guy, who appears to be guilty, and what he did before gettin into office.

More of trying to divert the question.

Stick to the question of having the former Speaker of the House perp walked into court. How dignified is that? Another Mark Foley after underage boys while preaching the moral highground?

Originally Posted by Guest

More of trying to divert the question.

Stick to the question of having the former Speaker of the House perp walked into court. How dignified is that? Another Mark Foley after underage boys while preaching the moral highground?

You genuine homophobe, evil, uncarding monster.

Sniff, sniff ... boo hoo !!!

Denny, just like Mark, was simply looking for love and here you go being judgmental. Who are we to say grown men can't prey upon younger men? What could possibly be wrong with that?

For that matter, if the President of the US wants to assault and overpower a young intern in the Oval Orifice, why do you have to be so mean and old fashioned about a sex pervert no matter what his/her/it's gender?

Originally Posted by Guest

You genuine homophobe, evil, uncarding monster.

Sniff, sniff ... boo hoo !!!

Denny, just like Mark, was simply looking for love and here you go being judgmental. Who are we to say grown men can't prey upon younger men? What could possibly be wrong with that?

For that matter, if the President of the US wants to assault and overpower a young intern in the Oval Orifice, why do you have to be so mean and old fashioned about a sex pervert no matter what his/her/it's gender?

It's rather ironical that the person who led the impeachment of the former president is now looking at five years in prison for each offense.

Most of the old impeachment gang got thrown out of office including Rep Newt Gingrich (R-GA), Rep Bill McCollum (R-FL), Rep Bob Barr (R-GA), Rep Mary Bono (R-CA), all resigned or lost elections. And the former president is measuring the White House for drapes once again. There is a god.

Originally Posted by Guest

It's rather ironical that the person who led the impeachment of the former president is now looking at five years in prison for each offense.

Most of the old impeachment gang got thrown out of office including Rep Newt Gingrich (R-GA), Rep Bill McCollum (R-FL), Rep Bob Barr (R-GA), Rep Mary Bono (R-CA), all resigned or lost elections. And the former president is measuring the White House for drapes once again. There is a god.

Excellent post!

Back to the original post where the Guest suggests that it was not courageous for Jenner to transition and having full ODS attacks the President for not calling members of the military courageous.

I won't bother to link the hundreds of speeches given over the President's administration where he uses the exact word courage or courageous in reference to the military. You Guest are an unabashed liar to attempt to have that allegation pass as truthful. However to suggest that Jenner was not courageous in her decision is equally foolish. If I recall, you spouted a stream of bile at her with the "trying to shove down our throats" line that so often appears in Leviticans' opinions. And "who cares about he/she garbage" It is that hate that make Jenner's choice to come out of the closet courageous, to be an example for others facing similar issues, to do it with grace. If you think this was easy for her to do, and face the backlash of uninformed distain and revulsion coming from people like Guest then perhaps I don't understand the meaning of courage.
If courage means not accepting publicity for being brave, not writing a book, or not allowing a movie dramatization, or a TV show, then we are into new definitions.

Originally Posted by Guest

It's rather ironical that the person who led the impeachment of the former president is now looking at five years in prison for each offense.

Most of the old impeachment gang got thrown out of office including Rep Newt Gingrich (R-GA), Rep Bill McCollum (R-FL), Rep Bob Barr (R-GA), Rep Mary Bono (R-CA), all resigned or lost elections. And the former president is measuring the White House for drapes once again. There is a god.

This is what is commonly called taking select pieces of different puzzles and taping them together and calling for all to see the picture that fits the objective they INVENTED/HALLUCINATED.

Originally Posted by Guest

It's rather ironical that the person who led the impeachment of the former president is now looking at five years in prison for each offense.

Most of the old impeachment gang got thrown out of office including Rep Newt Gingrich (R-GA), Rep Bill McCollum (R-FL), Rep Bob Barr (R-GA), Rep Mary Bono (R-CA), all resigned or lost elections. And the former president is measuring the White House for drapes once again. There is a god.

Remember, you cannot be a liberal and believe in God ... unless you mean Gaia or some other pagan concept. That would work for you

Originally Posted by Guest

Back to the original post where the Guest suggests that it was not courageous for Jenner to transition and having full ODS attacks the President for not calling members of the military courageous.

I won't bother to link the hundreds of speeches given over the President's administration where he uses the exact word courage or courageous in reference to the military. You Guest are an unabashed liar to attempt to have that allegation pass as truthful. However to suggest that Jenner was not courageous in her decision is equally foolish. If I recall, you spouted a stream of bile at her with the "trying to shove down our throats" line that so often appears in Leviticans' opinions. And "who cares about he/she garbage" It is that hate that make Jenner's choice to come out of the closet courageous, to be an example for others facing similar issues, to do it with grace. If you think this was easy for her to do, and face the backlash of uninformed distain and revulsion coming from people like Guest then perhaps I don't understand the meaning of courage.
If courage means not accepting publicity for being brave, not writing a book, or not allowing a movie dramatization, or a TV show, then we are into new definitions.

That was an exceptional post!

Originally Posted by Guest

Back to the original post where the Guest suggests that it was not courageous for Jenner to transition and having full ODS attacks the President for not calling members of the military courageous.

I won't bother to link the hundreds of speeches given over the President's administration where he uses the exact word courage or courageous in reference to the military. You Guest are an unabashed liar to attempt to have that allegation pass as truthful. However to suggest that Jenner was not courageous in her decision is equally foolish. If I recall, you spouted a stream of bile at her with the "trying to shove down our throats" line that so often appears in Leviticans' opinions. And "who cares about he/she garbage" It is that hate that make Jenner's choice to come out of the closet courageous, to be an example for others facing similar issues, to do it with grace. If you think this was easy for her to do, and face the backlash of uninformed distain and revulsion coming from people like Guest then perhaps I don't understand the meaning of courage.
If courage means not accepting publicity for being brave, not writing a book, or not allowing a movie dramatization, or a TV show, then we are into new definitions.

Yawn .... Jenner is NOT courageous and the reaction is not about hate yadda.

It's about being fed up with this garbage being paraded on TV 24x7 in an attempt to make perversion the new normal.

Now, be honest, you really knew that before you posted all the trendy bs you just did correct?

Originally Posted by Guest

Yawn .... Jenner is NOT courageous and the reaction is not about hate yadda.

It's about being fed up with this garbage being paraded on TV 24x7 in an attempt to make perversion the new normal.

Now, be honest, you really knew that before you posted all the trendy bs you just did correct?

Excellent post. Fed up with the new normal as being considered transgender. Normal are men and women as God created hence Adam and Eve

Originally Posted by Guest

Back to the original post where the Guest suggests that it was not courageous for Jenner to transition and having full ODS attacks the President for not calling members of the military courageous.

I won't bother to link the hundreds of speeches given over the President's administration where he uses the exact word courage or courageous in reference to the military. You Guest are an unabashed liar to attempt to have that allegation pass as truthful. However to suggest that Jenner was not courageous in her decision is equally foolish. If I recall, you spouted a stream of bile at her with the "trying to shove down our throats" line that so often appears in Leviticans' opinions. And "who cares about he/she garbage" It is that hate that make Jenner's choice to come out of the closet courageous, to be an example for others facing similar issues, to do it with grace. If you think this was easy for her to do, and face the backlash of uninformed distain and revulsion coming from people like Guest then perhaps I don't understand the meaning of courage.
If courage means not accepting publicity for being brave, not writing a book, or not allowing a movie dramatization, or a TV show, then we are into new definitions.

Very good post!

It is amazing how many bigots are present in our community. I just wonder how many of these regressives would say their hateful comments to Caitlyn Jenner face-to-face. It would be a great YouTube video to see her kick their sorry ass, wouldn't it?

new normal is a BS term/concept like political correctness term/concept....nothing but a liscence to do or say what is not true or correct but provides a phony/false comfort level.

Originally Posted by Guest

Very good post!

It is amazing how many bigots are present in our community. I just wonder how many of these regressives would say their hateful comments to Caitlyn Jenner face-to-face. It would be a great YouTube video to see her kick their sorry ass, wouldn't it?

The use of name calling ... ie bigots ... etc is no longer going to work. You call people names when they disagree with your genuinely twisted and abnormal views ...

The fact that Bruce Jenner could still kick your ass or mine also clearly indicate his chromosomes dictate that he is a male. Rather ironic hypothetical you cite actually

Originally Posted by Guest

The use of name calling ... ie bigots ... etc is no longer going to work. You call people names when they disagree with your genuinely twisted and abnormal views ...

The fact that Bruce Jenner could still kick your ass or mine also clearly indicate his chromosomes dictate that he is a male. Rather ironic hypothetical you cite actually

I have seen plenty of women in The Villages who could do that and I doubt that they are all transgender - just big and strong!

Originally Posted by Guest

I have seen plenty of women in The Villages who could do that and I doubt that they are all transgender - just big and strong!

Yes, that's true ... some beefy gals here in TV. However, even though this seems to be a challenging concept for you, they still can't beat men in the decathlon nor could they for example play in the NFL.

Men are stronger in general ...wow, I know you must think that's bigoted but tough you know what