Originally Posted by Guest

These congressional hearings are just a complete waste of taxpayer dollars ($4 million so far) and just Republicans trying to smear Mrs. Clinton.

The public is tired of this and it is going to backfire on Republicans. Mrs. Clinton will be elected President. It will be another term of Republicans doing everything they can to block absolutely anything a President wants.

I wouldn't vote for them if they didn't block everything the President wants. I don't agree with anything the president wants, so why would I elect someone that wouldn't block him? You are very silly. Unlike you, I don't embrace socialism. In my opinion, today's Republicans are not conservative enough.

Originally Posted by Guest

I wouldn't vote for them if they didn't block everything the President wants. I don't agree with anything the president wants, so why would I elect someone that wouldn't block him? You are very silly. Unlike you, I don't embrace socialism. In my opinion, today's Republicans are not conservative enough.

...and you just proved yourself to be IGNORANT.

Originally Posted by Guest

These congressional hearings are just a complete waste of taxpayer dollars ($4 million so far) and just Republicans trying to smear Mrs. Clinton.

The public is tired of this and it is going to backfire on Republicans. Mrs. Clinton will be elected President. It will be another term of Republicans doing everything they can to block absolutely anything a President wants.

May I ask were the Nixon Watergate investigation also a waste of taxpayers money? the liberal media made cult heroes for Woodward and Bernstein for a break-in that pale in comparison to the damage Hillary Clinton created by being absent while on duty.

Are you my liberal friend going to also tell us that only back lives matter

The actions of Hillary Clinton concerning her neglect regarding to Benghazi, her failure to follow up and arrest the people to blame as she promised the mother of one of the deceased...oh that's right they arrested the guy who made the video. and her use of a personal server that placed in this country in harms way were of great magnitude. Yet the liberal media is so intent on deciding for the public what is of importance that they either ignore on ridicule any effort to find the truth. You do know that countries like north Korea practice that sort of journalism? Maybe you do and think its cool?

Personal Best Regards:

What difference does it make? Democrats control ALL branches of the Government including the FBI. SO you really think they are going rat one of their own out. They didn't put those heads of departments in there for nothing. Hilary will NOT be indicted, she just like her cigar poking hubby, water flows right of there backs. Clintons have dirt bag full of dirt on majority of the democrats. They will NEVER face the fire!

Originally Posted by Guest

What difference does it make? Democrats control ALL branches of the Government including the FBI. SO you really think they are going rat one of their own out. They didn't put those heads of departments in there for nothing. Hilary will NOT be indicted, she just like her cigar poking hubby, water flows right of there backs. Clintons have dirt bag full of dirt on majority of the democrats. They will NEVER face the fire!

I agree. And, the naive stooges in the electorate will vote for her.

Originally Posted by Guest

I agree. And, the naive stooges in the electorate will vote for her.

Party first no matter what!! No decision making required!

Originally Posted by Guest

...and you just proved yourself to be IGNORANT.

Apparently, you don't know the definition of "ignorant." And, I believe that makes YOU ignorant.

Interesting article on POLITICO today which compliments very strongly Hillary Clinton's ability to testify before committees. He endurance an sharpness.

I found the section below to be of particular interest.

It speaks to the deceit and also the short memory of the voters.

"Yet even then the first lady’s tour was haunted by the Whitewater scandals—which began with allegations of conflicts of interest rooted in a failed Arkansas real estate investment. In a cruel twist—or a poorly executed manipulation—on January 5, as the tour began, the Clintons’ secretary announced she had stumbled onto a box in the “book room,” deep in the Clintons’ private domain, the Executive Mansion. The box contained long-sought billing records detailing the legal work Hillary Clinton and her Rose Law Firm colleagues did for the Madison Guaranty savings and loan at the heart of the Whitewater scandal.

Five investigative bodies had been requesting those records, some for as long as two years. The bills conveniently appeared two days after the statute of limitations expired, so that bank regulators could not sue the Rose Law Firm or any attorneys involved in the bank’s $60 million bankruptcy.

Mrs. Clinton had insisted that she remembered little about what was an insignificant case. The records showed otherwise, proving that Hillary Clinton, Esq., had worked 60 hours over 15 months, averaging an hour a week, on this file, with over a dozen meetings. Her claim that this proved that the file was forgettable meant that this supposed superlawyer was invoking a defense of borderline malpractice to dodge more serious charges of dishonesty and fraud. Ronald Reagan had made a similar choice when defending himself during the Iran-Contra scandal. Ultimately, like the 18½-minute gap with Watergate, the sudden surfacing of the long-sought billing records would remain a mystery: Were they genuinely misplaced or purposely overlooked? How did they suddenly emerge? “Nobody knows the real story with the billing records,” the White House counsel and Whitewater troubleshooter Jane Sherburne would say with a sigh.


Read more: How Hillary Testifies - POLITICO Magazine

AS you can see at the end of this section, she is not alone in knowing how to play the game and we wonder why in the world movements who oppose big government can get "legs".....seems we, the voters have lost control over our government !!

An interesting spin from a British news magazine on Secy Clinton as a candidate. I did not realize some of the statistics listed for her New York campaign especially.

"Clinton has never beaten a first-class opponent. And nothing in her recent campaign should cause us to forget it."

"I cannot stop emphasizing: Hillary Clinton's only electoral victories were in one of the most Democratic states in the country and against nobodies. She defeated an incompetent Republican backbencher, Rick Lazio, in 2000. In 2006, the New York State Republican Party sent John Spencer, mayor of Yonkers, to be its sacrificial lamb. Clinton spent $36 million defeating Spencer in an election with a 23 percent voter turnout. Spencer had raised just over $5 million, and was given to describing people as having a "Chinaman's chance." Not exactly a model for defeating the GOP this time — unless Donald Trump is her opponent, he suddenly goes dead broke, and his name recognition drops by roughly 97 percent. (The "Chinaman's chance" thing, I can imagine him saying.)

Clinton was beat when Barack Obama slyly made ethics and conviction the themes of his campaign."

Hillary Clinton is still a terrible candidate