Originally Posted by RichieLion

You won't address the ignoring of a presented writ; a legally binding subpoena that the President ignored.

Of course you can't, or rather you won't. It's really telling about you, and Dale and the other fawning masses that you ignore this.

Oh!!, and the Secretary of State of Georgia still has to accept this partisan judge's ruling. We know the fix is in, but how deep?

It's not quite over yet.

Unless you work for the Department of Justice and have access to the subpoena, your credibility on this issue is suspect.

Originally Posted by buggyone

Katz,
Sorry to hear about your brush with the law. Wasn't there an opportunity to contest the ticket? You would have had your witnesses vs the bus driver and the outcome would be up to a judge.

That is exactly what I did...However, my point is, I had no right to just not show up just because I thought the ticket's claim was bogus.

Originally Posted by janmcn

Unless you work for the Department of Justice and have access to the subpoena, your credibility on this issue is suspect.

Oh enlighten me then, won't you? Under what circumstances are you permitted by law to ignore a legally issued subpoena?

Are there circumstances when you can just throw it in the trash?

I would have to read the subpoena to answer your question. I'm just guessing that expert legal minds have done just that.

Originally Posted by RichieLion

Oh enlighten me then, won't you? Under what circumstances are you permitted by law to ignore a legally issued subpoena?

Are there circumstances when you can just throw it in the trash?

And, Richie, as much as you've claimed I'm "spinning" it, I still haven't seen an answer to MY question.

That is - WHO got served? It's not like some GA sheriff walked up to the door of the White House and served the President.

I'm guessing that it HAD to be some member of a legal team - and THAT person (or persons) could be in a lot of trouble.

If it was legally served to the President's representative then THEY are on the hook. Any first year law student would probably say that the legal team was responsible for notifying the President and consulting him.

It may very well be that they didn't take it as serious as it should have been. If so, there would be more charges coming out of this.

Originally Posted by djplong

And, Richie, as much as you've claimed I'm "spinning" it, I still haven't seen an answer to MY question.

That is - WHO got served? It's not like some GA sheriff walked up to the door of the White House and served the President.

I'm guessing that it HAD to be some member of a legal team - and THAT person (or persons) could be in a lot of trouble.

If it was legally served to the President's representative then THEY are on the hook. Any first year law student would probably say that the legal team was responsible for notifying the President and consulting him.

It may very well be that they didn't take it as serious as it should have been. If so, there would be more charges coming out of this.

Your question seems retorical to me, or at least a very hard one to find an answer for. If I'm wrong and/or if Richie doesn't give you an answer, please do provide us with the answer for him.

As for the president's representative, they could be on the hook as you indicated. But where does the buck stop? Is the President not the chief executive, responsible for everything that happens in the White House adminiatration just as the president of most any corporation or any past president of the US? If not then we're in more trouble in this country than any of us previously thought!

Originally Posted by kathy and al

Sorry about above IP address. You need to go directly to nationalpatriot.com

Try this for more background:

thenationalpatriot.com » Blog Archive » OBAMA ELIGIBILITY COURT CASE…BLOW BY BLOW

Of course this will all blow over when it is discovered that the American born Malcolm X is Obama's real father.

All the ingredients for a delicious "swift boat" October surprise. Timing is everything.

"I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts." -- Will Rogers

Originally Posted by RichieLion

Oh enlighten me then, won't you? Under what circumstances are you permitted by law to ignore a legally issued subpoena?

Are there circumstances when you can just throw it in the trash?

So why wasn't President Obama held in contempt of court by the Atlanta judge for ignoring a legally issued subpoena?

Originally Posted by RichieLion

Oh enlighten me then, won't you? Under what circumstances are you permitted by law to ignore a legally issued subpoena?

Are there circumstances when you can just throw it in the trash?

When the judge is a Georgia Red Neck with obvious racist intentions.

I'm through addressing all the asinine responses to the issuing of, and presidential contempt for this legally issued subpoena. As if the Georgia courts don't know how to present a subpoena. What idiocy. The Kool-Aid is just too strong and the lap dogs too busy humping the presidential leg for this to be debated with any intelligence.

So why no contempt of court charges against President Obama is a serious question which deserves a serious answer?

The whole thing is ridiculous. I find it insulting for any judge from any state to serve a sitting president. Everyone on here knows how strong I have been for Romney, but to do this silly childish bunk to a sitting US President is just plain foolish. Whats next, stop his limo for speeding on the way from the white house going to the capital building. I want an end to this silliness right now. You make us Republicans look like uneducated children.

Originally Posted by The Villager II

The whole thing is ridiculous. I find it insulting for any judge from any state to serve a sitting president. Everyone on here knows how strong I have been for Romney, but to do this silly childish bunk to a sitting US President is just plain foolish. Whats next, stop his limo for speeding on the way from the white house going to the capital building. I want an end to this silliness right now. You make us Republicans look like uneducated children.

Sitting presidents shouldn't be held accountable for their actions? Really! I guess that means that Nixon should have been held responsible for his Watergate coverups. I guess that means that Clinton should not have been held responsible for disgracing the White House with his little cigars. Where would you draw the line if not in the case of suspected fraud upon the American people. Would it be if a sitting Republican ordered that SanFranscisco be nuked because it's strongly left wing? Would it be if a sitting Democrat ordered The Villages leveled because it's strongly right wing? And YOU want to end this so called silliness RIGHT NOW!!! YOU? And by what authority would that be!!! Are you the owner of this site?

Originally Posted by skyguy79

Sitting presidents shouldn't be held accountable for their actions? Really! I guess that means that Nixon should have been held responsible for his Watergate coverups. I guess that means that Clinton should not have been held responsible for disgracing the White House with his little cigars. Where would you draw the line if not in the case of suspected fraud upon the American people. Would it be if a sitting Republican ordered that SanFranscisco be nuked because it's strongly left wing? Would it be if a sitting Democrat ordered The Villages leveled because it's strongly right wing? And YOU want to end this so called silliness RIGHT NOW!!! YOU? And by what authority would that be!!! Are you the owner of this site?

The Kool-Aid is really strong Sky. I can't believe the idiocy.

If this was GW they'd be screaming for impeachment and frothing at the mouth. This is one of the most incredible things I've seen on this forum.

Originally Posted by RichieLion

The Kool-Aid is really strong Sky. I can't believe the idiocy.

If this was GW they'd be screaming for impeachment and frothing at the mouth. This is one of the most incredible things I've seen on this forum.

Ain't that the truth. This kind of double standard and behavior has been happening long before Obama stole the DNC nomination out from Hillary. You'd think we'd be use to it by now!