http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/06/world/06arms.html
Everyday it is something new.

Let's hold hands and sing Kumbaya and hope that India, North Korea, Russia, France, the United Kingdom, China, France, Pakistan, Iran, Iraq and Isreal, know the lyrics to Obama's song.

Originally Posted by ejp52

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/06/world/06arms.html
Everyday it is something new.

I do not get this at all. It is always very idealistic to wish for non use of nuclear but what is his rush to announce this.....he will not even use them if we are attacked biologically...this guy is all words...all he has ever been...he lives in a world that is not real...it is academic at best !

It saddens me to say that it seems that we have to pick from one of the following:

Un-American

Anti-American

Enemy of the constitution

Fool

What say you?

Yoda

http://www.wikihow.com/Survive-a-Nuclear-Attack

Originally Posted by Yoda

It saddens me to say that it seems that we have to pick from one of the following:

Un-American

Anti-American

Enemy of the constitution

Fool

What say you?

Yoda

I say the 1st three.

The man obviously needs his head nuked in a microwave oven for an hour. Then things will make sense to this moron.

Originally Posted by GatbTester

The man obviously needs his head nuked in a microwave oven for an hour. Then things will make sense to this moron.

Don't hang you hat on Obama being dumb. He is a smart , calculating , genius at following and implementing the directions from others who share his idiology of Big Government with complete control of each of us and the private sector.

bkcuningham: You clearly missed this part of the article:

But the president said in an interview that he was carving out an exception for “outliers like Iran and North Korea” that have violated or renounced the main treaty to halt nuclear proliferation.

...specifically mentioning two of the countries you had concerns about. Though why you're worried about France, I don't know - unless I'm misinterpreting your meaning.

Originally Posted by Yoda

It saddens me to say that it seems that we have to pick from one of the following:

Un-American

Anti-American

Enemy of the constitution

Fool

What say you?

Yoda

Plus more.

djplong, I listed France because they are part of the nuclear club. You know, one of the "nuclear weapons states" an internationally recognized status by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

I do agree that this administration is really about control........of everything, government and eventually even our lives, sound neurotic? Bet the Holocaust sounded neurotic in the beginning as well!

I honestly think this man hates America. No, I'm sure of it.

"It saddens me to say that it seems that we have to pick from one of the following: Un-American, Anti-American, Enemy of the constitution, Fool
What say you?
Yoda "

Yoda, I don't know. I found this New York Times article from July 4, 2009 "Obama’s Youth Shaped His Nuclear-Free Vision." It talks about Obama's 1980s days at Columbia University and an article he wrote for a campus magazine. In the magazine article, which is linked here, Obama talks about his dreams of a nuclear free world. All of this was written during the President Ronald Reagan presidency and his fabulous "axis of evil" speech.

On the third page of the article, Obama's nuclear strategy is discussed: "Even more ambitious, Mr. Obama wants a Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty, which would bar all nations that sign it from making fuel for their atom bombs. But when asked how Mr. Obama would sell the idea to America’s allies — primarily Pakistan, India and Israel — administration officials grow silent.

"All this is supposed to culminate, next year, in an American effort to rewrite crucial provisions of the 1968 Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. Mr. Obama wants to strengthen inspection provisions and close the loophole that makes it easy for countries to drop out, as North Korea did in 2003.

" Each of those steps would require building a global consensus. It would also mean persuading countries to give up the coveted freedom to make fuel for reactors — and instead, probably, buy it from an international fuel bank.

" Most of all, Mr. Obama and like-minded leaders will have to establish a new global order that will truly restrain rogue states and terrorist groups from moving ahead with nuclear projects. "



http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/05/wo...ewanted=1&_r=1


http://documents.nytimes.com/obama-s...le#document/p1

MAD worked just fine. 100% in fact. Why change it?

Yoda