Originally Posted by Villages Kahuna

Holy cats! Are you really saying that if I don't believe everything Rush Limbaugh says, that I'm a liberal?

I'm sorry. Limbaugh is still a buffoon and if I listen to him at all, it's purely for the entertainment value. He's an entertainer and conducts himself in ways to enhance his attractiveness to sponsors, nothing more. People who actually buy into his brand of inflamatory nonsense are part of the reason why this country is so divided.

Yes, Rush is a buffoon and I still have the political beliefs I had before. And they sure aren't all that way to the left hand side of left.

To me VK, and I'm only using your words, a buffoon is better described as someone who has strong conclusions about someone who he admitingly does not listen to and therefore knows little about what that person says and believes in any intelligent context. I don't want to sound disrespectful, but in reading some of your posts I'm developing a "head-shaking" syndrome.

Originally Posted by graciegirl

It is stuff like this, this extremism that is going to defeat our goals. We don't have to agree to like the persona of Limbaugh to be a good loyal Republican. It is o.k. NOT to be left of left as VK says. A moderate is not a liberal.

I imagine that a lot of staunch Democrats don't care for Nancy Pelosi.

And by the way...Is it against the rules to be attractive to be nominated for Supreme Court?

I am glad that somebody finally said it. Also, are middle-age white men now banned from being a contender. You would think that with thousands of years of evolution there might be one or two that could fit that description? Are these candidates some form of reparations from some supposed injustice from it's history? Are they really looking for the "best" candidates? I don't think so!!!!

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=37021

Originally Posted by Donna2

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=37021

Excellent article with many interesting facts that liberal posters to this thread keep asking for. I fear, though, that the facts will pale for them in the face of the messenger. Just as a fact reported by Fox News or Rush Limbaugh is discounted because of the entity who articulates said fact. If Katie Couric says the sky is blue, liberals will listen. If Shepard Smith says the same thing, there will be derision.

RichieLion, I get your point, but pick some one other than Shepard Smith. Shep is a liberal. He has two hours, on FOX, every week day. Hard to believe, I know, on that evil right wing station. I'm still waiting for a conservative to have even a half hour show, on any of the alphabets.

Originally Posted by Sally Jo

RichieLion, I get your point, but pick some one other than Shepard Smith. Shep is a liberal. He has two hours, on FOX, every week day. Hard to believe, I know, on that evil right wing station. I'm still waiting for a conservative to have even a half hour show, on any of the alphabets.

Liberals on Fox News? How can that be? Can they really be "fair and balanced"? What are you trying to pull Sally Jo?