Originally Posted by Guest

You read much too much of left wing blogs my friend.

And you simply rant....there is nothing in your posts but blame for everything on Republicans.

I would love if you would stick on one subject and talk to that subject...like...

Explain and give us links to prove your point, because you seem to think if you say it, it is true and I disagree...you make stuff up....now, give us the details of his search to have any Republicans support ACA..

He actually mocked them in public on television...THAT was the end of the story for most. He basically told them he KNEW and stay out the way, and unlike other Presidents in the past, he did it publicly and loudly.

Then, if you want to start a thread on the internal strife with the Republicans, then do it, BUT nobody is going to accept you are your word. You need to give facts.

LASTLY on behalf of other posters, you are about the most insulting person on this forum. EVERY SINGLE post of yours blames everything on Republicans and then ends with how everything is blamed on Obama, and you dont even see that.

If you do not like the forum, leave as you have threatened because you just preach random thoughts with no connection, no facts just your gut feeling from some left wing website. How do I know......if you enter some of your sentences partially in google, you will be directed in the results to those sites. You are an easy and irritating read

You make me laugh. I don't read any left wing blogs. I have a brain in my head, and I use it. That is a great liability here. Instead of trying to read into everything, try as hard as it may be to read a post, and accept the fact that there is no hidden meaning. The Republicans here are the ones that always want to play the blame game.

I blame the Republicans for everything. If that is the case, please explain this sentence in my post that you referenced, "There is plenty of blame to go around for everyone in Washington." What is the definition of everyone? I thought that meant both parties, but what do I know, because I can't see.

Where did I say that Obama got any Republican support for the ACA? You just made that up, which you have a habit of doing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patien...dable_Care_Act

I said he tried to get republican support. Read the Background, and Healthcare debate 2008-10 in the link above. I am not sure. Is Wikipedia a left wing blog?

Supply facts here. That is the last thing people want. All you in particular want to do is demean someone that doesn't agree with you. What did I make up in the post that you referenced? I pointed several things that you made up. What goes around comes around.

Originally Posted by Guest

Actually, I think that 34 Democrats voted against this Obama Care in the house, and that a "bribe"...not a nice word....but the Senator from LA was posed to vote against it which would have killed it and suddenly, LA got a windfall from the WH of mucho money...not a bribe, but along with the Insurance Industry, they became big winners.

AS Thomas Jefferson said..."“great innovations should not be forced on a slender majority – or enacted without broad support.”

But President Obama has proven that he feels he knows better than anyone in the world on any subject.

Poster wants to know WHY it seems like everything is blamed on Obama. Because I can not recall in my long lifetime a more arrogant, know it all President ever.

I always get accused of not supplying links, but others here don't have to. I check the senators from LA, I assume LA is Louisiana, the senator that you appear to be talking about is Mary Landrieu. The problem with your post is she was reelected in 2008 before Obama was president. How she was posed to vote against a bill that wasn't even up for a vote from a president that hadn't taken office yet? Well, that is a real nice trick.

Originally Posted by Guest

You make me laugh. I don't read any left wing blogs. I have a brain in my head, and I use it. That is a great liability here. Instead of trying to read into everything, try as hard as it may be to read a post, and accept the fact that there is no hidden meaning. The Republicans here are the ones that always want to play the blame game.

I blame the Republicans for everything. If that is the case, please explain this sentence in my post that you referenced, "There is plenty of blame to go around for everyone in Washington." What is the definition of everyone? I thought that meant both parties, but what do I know, because I can't see.

Where did I say that Obama got any Republican support for the ACA? You just made that up, which you have a habit of doing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patien...dable_Care_Act

I said he tried to get republican support. Read the Background, and Healthcare debate 2008-10 in the link above. I am not sure. Is Wikipedia a left wing blog?

Supply facts here. That is the last thing people want. All you in particular want to do is demean someone that doesn't agree with you. What did I make up in the post that you referenced? I pointed several things that you made up. What goes around comes around.

Seek help. When a person insists that everyone else around him is wrong, then guess what? He is the one that is wrong. Kind of like the guy that says everyone else around him is crazy. He's the crazy one.

You are by yourself. You are the one that claims everyone is against you and your Obama messiah. Yet, you are the one that only contributes with slurs and complaints. Then you threaten to take your ball and go home. Well, guess what? We aren't playing ball, so we don't need your ball. Go away. Come back when you have something to contribute. If you really need attention that much, seek help. What you are doing to yourself is not healthy.

Originally Posted by Guest

I always get accused of not supplying links, but others here don't have to. I check the senators from LA, I assume LA is Louisiana, the senator that you appear to be talking about is Mary Landrieu. The problem with your post is she was reelected in 2008 before Obama was president. How she was posed to vote against a bill that wasn't even up for a vote from a president that hadn't taken office yet? Well, that is a real nice trick.

You're kidding, right? Do you really have that much trouble understanding things? You must not have been interested in following the fight over Obamacare when it was introduced into congress. The whole thing was handled underhanded and behind closed doors. Republicans were not even allowed to participate and therefore none of them voted for it. Even Pelosi admitted that she hadn't read it and stated that it needed to be voted on and then we could see what's in it.

Originally Posted by Guest

Seek help. When a person insists that everyone else around him is wrong, then guess what? He is the one that is wrong. Kind of like the guy that says everyone else around him is crazy. He's the crazy one.

You are by yourself. You are the one that claims everyone is against you and your Obama messiah. Yet, you are the one that only contributes with slurs and complaints. Then you threaten to take your ball and go home. Well, guess what? We aren't playing ball, so we don't need your ball. Go away. Come back when you have something to contribute. If you really need attention that much, seek help. What you are doing to yourself is not healthy.

You aren't playing ball, because you took your ball and went home crying. You put words into my mouth, when I challenge you on the remarks you post this nonsense. You are not the superior being that you think you are. I am not healthy! Talking to closed minded individuals will do that to you.
What the people don't want here is talking to a person that doesn't agree with them. Here that is everyone that isn't far right.

Originally Posted by Guest

You're kidding, right? Do you really have that much trouble understanding things? You must not have been interested in following the fight over Obamacare when it was introduced into congress. The whole thing was handled underhanded and behind closed doors. Republicans were not even allowed to participate and therefore none of them voted for it. Even Pelosi admitted that she hadn't read it and stated that it needed to be voted on and then we could see what's in it.

Did you read the history of the ACA, that was included in a previous post? I know that you didn't by reading this post. You insist that people provide the links to a post, but when they do you don't read them.

In case you haven't noticed, and by your remakes you haven't, the Senate Republicans vote as a group on almost everything.

The person suggested that Mary Landrieu, Senator from Louisiana, ACA vote was bought by sending a lot of money to Louisiana. Well, a lot of money was sent to LA. It was Hurricane Katrina relief. So, sending disaster relief money buys you a vote! So, what vote was Obama looking for from Christie, when he sent disaster relief money to NJ for Sandy?

Originally Posted by Guest

Did you read the history of the ACA, that was included in a previous post? I know that you didn't by reading this post. You insist that people provide the links to a post, but when they do you don't read them.

In case you haven't noticed, and by your remakes you haven't, the Senate Republicans vote as a group on almost everything.

The person suggested that Mary Landrieu, Senator from Louisiana, ACA vote was bought by sending a lot of money to Louisiana. Well, a lot of money was sent to LA. It was Hurricane Katrina relief. So, sending disaster relief money buys you a vote! So, what vote was Obama looking for from Christie, when he sent disaster relief money to NJ for Sandy?

You are not very well informed, and obviously didn't follow the whole Obamacare diabolical in congress. Otherwise, a simple thing like her deal would be clear to you. Everyone knows about it but you.

Originally Posted by Guest

You aren't playing ball, because you took your ball and went home crying. You put words into my mouth, when I challenge you on the remarks you post this nonsense. You are not the superior being that you think you are. I am not healthy! Talking to closed minded individuals will do that to you.
What the people don't want here is talking to a person that doesn't agree with them. Here that is everyone that isn't far right.

We don't care if you don't agree, but don't come in here crying your eyes out because we don't accept your slurs and stupid, childish remarks. If you have something to say in defense of a comment or facts to show we are wrong, go ahead, and welcome. Trouble is, you don't have anything to contribute other than your woe is me, the big boys won't let me play in their big boy game. Instead of crying and slurring, why not provide some useful information and we won't even know that you are the "juvenile" poster. But, there are some knowledgeable posters in here and they are not easily fooled by careless talking points thrown in here. They know the difference between taking points and facts. So, do yourself a favor. Either use facts to back up your ridiculous statements, or go find a liberal blog that you can play in. I do applaud you for wanting to play with the adults instead of wasting time with video games and the other kids.

Originally Posted by Guest

Did you read the history of the ACA, that was included in a previous post? I know that you didn't by reading this post. You insist that people provide the links to a post, but when they do you don't read them.

In case you haven't noticed, and by your remakes you haven't, the Senate Republicans vote as a group on almost everything.

The person suggested that Mary Landrieu, Senator from Louisiana, ACA vote was bought by sending a lot of money to Louisiana. Well, a lot of money was sent to LA. It was Hurricane Katrina relief. So, sending disaster relief money buys you a vote! So, what vote was Obama looking for from Christie, when he sent disaster relief money to NJ for Sandy?

Staffers on Capitol Hill were calling it the Louisiana Purchase.

On the eve of Saturday's showdown in the Senate over health-care reform, Democratic leaders still hadn't secured the support of Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.), one of the 60 votes needed to keep the legislation alive. The wavering lawmaker was offered a sweetener: at least $100 million in extra federal money for her home state.

And so it came to pass that Landrieu walked onto the Senate floor midafternoon Saturday to announce her aye vote -- and to trumpet the financial "fix" she had arranged for Louisiana. "I am not going to be defensive," she declared. "And it's not a $100 million fix. It's a $300 million fix."

Dana Milbank - Sweeteners for the South



"Do you remember the “Louisiana Purchase?” I don’t mean Thomas Jefferson’s acquisition of land from Napoleon, but rather Democrats’ acquisition of Sen. Mary Landrieu’s (D., La.) support for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Landrieu, critics believe, pledged her vote in exchange for gaining $200 million additional federal funds for Louisiana’s Medicaid program. Except that, due to a drafting error, the law ended up giving Louisiana $4.3 billion in extra Medicaid funds: more than twenty times the assigned amount. How this happened, and how Congress failed to fully fix it, is a microcosm of our new health law’s many flaws."



Forbes Welcome

Originally Posted by Guest

Did you read the history of the ACA, that was included in a previous post? I know that you didn't by reading this post. You insist that people provide the links to a post, but when they do you don't read them.

In case you haven't noticed, and by your remakes you haven't, the Senate Republicans vote as a group on almost everything.

The person suggested that Mary Landrieu, Senator from Louisiana, ACA vote was bought by sending a lot of money to Louisiana. Well, a lot of money was sent to LA. It was Hurricane Katrina relief. So, sending disaster relief money buys you a vote! So, what vote was Obama looking for from Christie, when he sent disaster relief money to NJ for Sandy?

I linked you to 2 seperate prices by news sources trusted.

Now please stop saying downright stupid stuff.

Read BOTH sides and stay away from the bias websites of both sides. And there is no denying, based on the things you say of what you read

I know it will be difficult, but speak to facts and stop making stuff up.

I almost spilled my coffee when I read your comment on Katrina; you obviously didn't have a clue and just rambled.