lib·er·al
ˈlib(ə)rəl/Submit
adjective
1.
open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values.
"they have more liberal views toward marriage and divorce than some people"
2.
(of education) concerned mainly with broadening a person's general knowledge and experience, rather than with technical or professional training.
synonyms: wide-ranging, broad-based, general
"a liberal education"
3.
(especially of an interpretation of a law) broadly construed or understood; not strictly literal or exact.
"they could have given the 1968 Act a more liberal interpretation"
synonyms: flexible, broad, loose, rough, free, general, nonliteral, nonspecific, imprecise, vague, indefinite
"a liberal interpretation of divorce laws"
4.
given, used, or occurring in generous amounts.
"liberal amounts of wine had been consumed"
synonyms: abundant, copious, ample, plentiful, generous, lavish, luxuriant, profuse, considerable, prolific, rich; literaryplenteous
"a liberal coating of paint"
noun
noun: liberal; plural noun: liberals
1.
a person of liberal views.

con·serv·a·tive
kənˈsərvədiv/Submit
adjective
1.
holding to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation, typically in relation to politics or religion.
synonyms: traditionalist, traditional, conventional, orthodox, old-fashioned, dyed-in-the-wool, hidebound, unadventurous, set in one's ways; More
noun
noun: conservative; plural noun: conservatives
1.
a person who is averse to change and holds to traditional values and attitudes, typically in relation to politics.
synonyms: right-winger, reactionary, rightist, diehard;

Trumpster

1)idiot

2) unable to distinguish reality

3) believing the lies of Donald Trump and/or making excuses that he really did not mean what he said, but believing him in spite of facts that contradict what he has said

4) a person blaming minority groups for all problems

5) fill in the blank......

Gotta love it when liberals accuse anyone of lying. They act like it is a major crime if Trump makes a mistake or is wrong in something he says. Liberals on here do not know the definition of lying. If they did, they would see that there is a requirement to have an intention to deceive. So much for that. By the way, by your definition or understanding of lying, give me one example of a politician that has not lied. Can't do it. So shut up.

So the statement by Rocket that you either support Trump's lies or you don't, is just a typical TROLL tactic.

I support President Trump, just as I support any other President. I also approve of a lot of what he has done so far. And don't give me that dumb @ss demand for a list of what he has done because there are lists all over the Internet. He is doing GREAT. Do I approve of his Tweets? I don't read his tweets, therefore I do not care what he says on them. Do I care that he is not a polished speaker? No. I judge the leader by the fruits of his work, not by what he says.

If that is not good enough, I really don't care because you don't mean a thing to me. I don't know any of you and I really do not care what you believe. I do know one thing, you are not loyal, patriotic American citizens judging by the way you disparage the President. So, I have no respect for you and I will tell you that to your face if you ever approach me.

I am not on here much anymore because I got tired of listening to you crybabies that are still in denial because Crooked, felon Hillary did not get elected. Personally, I hope she gets indicted by all of these investigations and finally sees real American justice. Then she can drop dead for all I care, or she can do it before the indictment. Either way, she will no longer be a problem in America. If that sounds harsh to you, live with it.

YOu folks do not wish to discuss politics. You wish to vent your nasty resentment that you lost. Live with it, awards for participation are no longer being handed out.

Originally Posted by Guest

OK. Here is the link to a listing of all federal crimes under Title 18 of the United States Code.

Help me out by pointing out the law that makes "colluding with a foreign government to affect the outcome of an election" a crime.

18 U.S. Code Part I - CRIMES | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

I didn't think so.

Carl in Tampa

Carl,

Your comments stirred my interest in the crime aspect.

You may enjoy these links...

Trump-Russia Probe Raises Debate Over Whether Collusion Is Criminal : NPR

Trump Campaign Meeting Raises Question: Is Collusion Even a Crime? - NBC News

Originally Posted by Guest

Carl,

Your comments stirred my interest in the crime aspect.

You may enjoy these links...

Trump-Russia Probe Raises Debate Over Whether Collusion Is Criminal : NPR

Trump Campaign Meeting Raises Question: Is Collusion Even a Crime? - NBC News

Yep. The ones who are against Trump admit that the wild accusations of "collusion" are not precisely legal, but rather colloquial. Translation: No crime.

Interestingly, super-liberal (and very distinguished) law professor Alan Dershowitz has spoken on the issue in many public venues.

From the link below, “Collusion is not a crime. There is no such crime as collusion,” Dershowitz told us on our “Morning Meeting” show.

Cashman: Dems just ‘crying wolf’ with claims of collusion | Boston Herald

Originally Posted by Guest

Yep. The ones who are against Trump admit that the wild accusations of "collusion" are not precisely legal, but rather colloquial. Translation: No crime.

Interestingly, super-liberal (and very distinguished) law professor Alan Dershowitz has spoken on the issue in many public venues.

From the link below, “Collusion is not a crime. There is no such crime as collusion,” Dershowitz told us on our “Morning Meeting” show.

Cashman: Dems just ‘crying wolf’ with claims of collusion | Boston Herald

Any chance you have a link to anyone actually saying it was a crime ?

And as I said...sad day for America when we even need to discuss this subject. Not speaking of some activist, as both sides sadly have, but a reasonable person making that charge about it being a crime.

Frankly, I never even considered the discussion and as I said....we reach a low point as a country when the discussion of whether colluding, cooperating, whatever word you use, with a foreign country (albeit not an ally) to impact an American institution is a crime.

Originally Posted by MDNLB

Gotta love it when liberals accuse anyone of lying. They act like it is a major crime if Trump makes a mistake or is wrong in something he says. Liberals on here do not know the definition of lying. If they did, they would see that there is a requirement to have an intention to deceive. So much for that. By the way, by your definition or understanding of lying, give me one example of a politician that has not lied. Can't do it. So shut up.

So the statement by Rocket that you either support Trump's lies or you don't, is just a typical TROLL tactic.

I support President Trump, just as I support any other President. I also approve of a lot of what he has done so far. And don't give me that dumb @ss demand for a list of what he has done because there are lists all over the Internet. He is doing GREAT. Do I approve of his Tweets? I don't read his tweets, therefore I do not care what he says on them. Do I care that he is not a polished speaker? No. I judge the leader by the fruits of his work, not by what he says.

If that is not good enough, I really don't care because you don't mean a thing to me. I don't know any of you and I really do not care what you believe. I do know one thing, you are not loyal, patriotic American citizens judging by the way you disparage the President. So, I have no respect for you and I will tell you that to your face if you ever approach me.

I am not on here much anymore because I got tired of listening to you crybabies that are still in denial because Crooked, felon Hillary did not get elected. Personally, I hope she gets indicted by all of these investigations and finally sees real American justice. Then she can drop dead for all I care, or she can do it before the indictment. Either way, she will no longer be a problem in America. If that sounds harsh to you, live with it.

YOu folks do not wish to discuss politics. You wish to vent your nasty resentment that you lost. Live with it, awards for participation are no longer being handed out.

In that single statement, you have exemplified the malignant ignorance of Trump's core supporters.

While obliquely acknowledging that Chump constantly lies through his teeth and that his lies have been easily provable, you still can't bring yourself to just come right out and say... Trump is a narcisistic compulsive liar.

Even worse, you then spew a long-winded diatribe of why purposeful and unrelenting lying by the POTUS...is just fine with you.

The slow rotting and the world's disgust of this great nation isn't really Trump's fault...it is because of people like you.



Deepest Sincere Wishes:

Originally Posted by Guest

In that single statement, you have exemplified the malignant ignorance of Trump's core supporters.

While obliquely acknowledging that Chump constantly lies through his teeth and that his lies have been easily provable, you still can't bring yourself to just come right out and say... Trump is a narcisistic compulsive liar.

Even worse, you then spew a long-winded diatribe of why purposeful and unrelenting lying by the POTUS...is just fine with you.

The slow rotting and the world's disgust of this great nation isn't really Trump's fault...it is because of people like you.



Deepest Sincere Wishes:

Great post.

In my mind, supporting a liar is like abetting a criminal.

You know they lie, never call them on it, and in fact perpetuate that lie......I don't know the difference.

these are not campaign or policy over or understatements. These are bold face, personal accusatory lies

Originally Posted by Rockyrd

Have you actually read your own link ?

You do know the election is over and the person you.....well, hesitate or won't criticize...is now the President. He is to govern, the election is past. This is election campaign fodder, and not connected personally to Obama and his family.

Listen, I have been a conservative for many years. I probably support most of what Trump says he supports, and that is another subject. What does he really support ?

Anyway, I also never ever said Trump or his campaign ever colluded or any such thing. I just do not have the power to see that. However, I do know the person involved, and I am sure you and your ilk who loathe anyone not Trump or anyone that is not involved in various conspiracy theories, do not mind having a President who is a compulsive, chronic liar.

Knowing you don't mind, there is no reason to believe you would ever frown on this disputable man's behavior. Response is always, uniformly, and without exception, to speak of Obama or Clinton as if simply mentioning those names absolve Trump of all lies and deception.

We have a President that we cannot ever believe...we have a President who finds an American investigation into DIRECT involvement an intrusion by a foreign country (something you would think a President would welcome); his daily basis for speaking ; and a hoax. We have a President who finds the freedom of the press to be a real problem, and who speaks of leaks as if they were not coming from his staff and his WH.

We will just agree to disagree...most Trump supporters as you, find his actions to be fine; find lies from our Oval Office; accusations of a personal nature; and done on a worldwide basis to be just fine.

I suppose I have that syndrome that all those who depend on truth from the WH have..and my feelings because I absolutely find no reason to trust our President are just passé.

As Trump reminded everyone last night......Clinton did this..Clinton did that..someday he will catch up to the present.

PS...you mention your background and I respect that, but since you never inquire about anyone else's background, just allow...I do not pretend to have your law enforcement background, BUT I have spent my entire adult life involved with Republican politics, statewide (PA), nationally, and in fact a couple years working on the streets of Tampa (living at 345 Bayshore and Skypoint)..addresses only to validate what I say....I do not lack experience. I suppose my criteria for President is different than yours, and save me the lecture on Clinton please. I have stated many times on here that our nomination system left us down, and if you read the ridiculing posts from the trolls on here, you would know i voted, but not for either of the two main candidates.

And you, the political expert with "50 years in the arena" voted Dopey Smurf for president...LOL

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

A surprise to me anyway. So many " witch hunts"


"JERUSALEM -- Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is suspected of crimes involving fraud, breach of trust and bribes in two corruption cases, Israeli police revealed Thursday.

Police have been questioning Netanyahu for months over the cases but have released few details. A gag order was released Thursday night on reporting the details of talks that are underway to enlist a state witness.

The document says the cases involving Netanyahu deal with "a suspicion of committing crimes of bribery, fraud and breach of trust."

On Friday, police said Netanyahu's former chief of staff and onetime close confidant agreed to testify against him."

Benjamin Netanyahu suspected of bribery, fraud, Israeli police say - CBS News

Originally Posted by Guest

Great post.

In my mind, supporting a liar is like abetting a criminal.

You know they lie, never call them on it, and in fact perpetuate that lie......I don't know the difference.

these are not campaign or policy over or understatements. These are bold face, personal accusatory lies

You didn't vote so you don't get an opinion on the subject.

Originally Posted by Guest

Gotta love it when liberals accuse anyone of lying. They act like it is a major crime if Trump makes a mistake or is wrong in something he says. Liberals on here do not know the definition of lying. If they did, they would see that there is a requirement to have an intention to deceive. So much for that. By the way, by your definition or understanding of lying, give me one example of a politician that has not lied. Can't do it. So shut up.

So the statement by Rocket that you either support Trump's lies or you don't, is just a typical TROLL tactic.

I support President Trump, just as I support any other President. I also approve of a lot of what he has done so far. And don't give me that dumb @ss demand for a list of what he has done because there are lists all over the Internet. He is doing GREAT. Do I approve of his Tweets? I don't read his tweets, therefore I do not care what he says on them. Do I care that he is not a polished speaker? No. I judge the leader by the fruits of his work, not by what he says.

If that is not good enough, I really don't care because you don't mean a thing to me. I don't know any of you and I really do not care what you believe. I do know one thing, you are not loyal, patriotic American citizens judging by the way you disparage the President. So, I have no respect for you and I will tell you that to your face if you ever approach me.

I am not on here much anymore because I got tired of listening to you crybabies that are still in denial because Crooked, felon Hillary did not get elected. Personally, I hope she gets indicted by all of these investigations and finally sees real American justice. Then she can drop dead for all I care, or she can do it before the indictment. Either way, she will no longer be a problem in America. If that sounds harsh to you, live with it.

YOu folks do not wish to discuss politics. You wish to vent your nasty resentment that you lost. Live with it, awards for participation are no longer being handed out.

Your head is so deep in the sand, you must be able to see Australia by now. How's the weather down there?

Originally Posted by Guest

Any chance you have a link to anyone actually saying it was a crime ?

And as I said...sad day for America when we even need to discuss this subject. Not speaking of some activist, as both sides sadly have, but a reasonable person making that charge about it being a crime.

Frankly, I never even considered the discussion and as I said....we reach a low point as a country when the discussion of whether colluding, cooperating, whatever word you use, with a foreign country (albeit not an ally) to impact an American institution is a crime.

From CNN: Washington (CNN) "The Justice Department on Wednesday appointed former FBI Director Robert Mueller as special counsel to oversee the federal investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, including potential collusion between President Donald Trump's campaign associates and Russian officials."

Special counsels are appointed to investigate crimes, not to investigate political activities that are not a crime. So, arguably, the Deputy Attorney General (an Obama appointee) who appointed Mueller was sending a message that collusion was a crime. (Attorney General Sessions had recused himself from the investigation.)

The letter of appointment specifically targets "any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals
associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump." I'll say it again, as did Liberal Lawyer Dershowitz, that is not a crime.

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2017/im...al.counsel.pdf

I don't so much consider the Deputy Attorney General a "reasonable person" as I do a political activist.

Carl in Tampa

Originally Posted by Guest

From CNN: Washington (CNN) "The Justice Department on Wednesday appointed former FBI Director Robert Mueller as special counsel to oversee the federal investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, including potential collusion between President Donald Trump's campaign associates and Russian officials."

Special counsels are appointed to investigate crimes, not to investigate political activities that are not a crime. So, arguably, the Deputy Attorney General (an Obama appointee) who appointed Mueller was sending a message that collusion was a crime. (Attorney General Sessions had recused himself from the investigation.)

The letter of appointment specifically targets "any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals
associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump." I'll say it again, as did Liberal Lawyer Dershowitz, that is not a crime.

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2017/im...al.counsel.pdf

I don't so much consider the Deputy Attorney General a "reasonable person" as I do a political activist.

Carl in Tampa

Thanks...your last post and others on this made it seem as if this was a rampant charge being made and apparently it is not.

Like I said, I do not think Trump personally colluded (uncovering the motivation for it might give him trouble personally), and think a discussion of whether anyone who did collude committing a crime is sort of missing the point. They are traitors first...whether you make a legal case or not.

Thanks for the link....just had never seen it alleged.

Originally Posted by Guest

Thanks...your last post and others on this made it seem as if this was a rampant charge being made and apparently it is not.

Like I said, I do not think Trump personally colluded (uncovering the motivation for it might give him trouble personally), and think a discussion of whether anyone who did collude committing a crime is sort of missing the point. They are traitors first...whether you make a legal case or not.

Thanks for the link....just had never seen it alleged.

You couldn't be more wrong. No one can be considered a traitor if they have not violated the definition of Treason as contained in Article Three of the Constitution.

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."

We live in a nation of laws............not opinions.

Originally Posted by Guest

You couldn't be more wrong. No one can be considered a traitor if they have not violated the definition of Treason as contained in Article Three of the Constitution.

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."

We live in a nation of laws............not opinions.

You are correct. Who can ever forget the Jaycees..."we are a government of laws, not men"

Did not mean it literally..sorry and your strict adherence to facts and reality is welcome.

You should visit other threads and impose that same logic 😊