O'Malley's star staring to shine brighter

» Site Navigation
Home Page The Villages Maps The Villages Activities The Villages Clubs The Villages Book Healthcare Rentals Real Estate Section Classified Section The Villages Directory Home Improvement Site Guidelines Advertising Info Register Now Video Tutorials Frequently Asked Questions
» Newsletter Signup
» Premium Tower
» Advertisements
» Trending News
» Tower Sponsors




















» Premium Sponsors
» Banner Sponsors
» Advertisements
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 04-02-2015, 09:18 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Well, suck it up and get used to it! The Dumplublicans don't have a cohesive base.
Well, at least you are willing to admit that we, as a country, are circling the drain. That's a start, I guess.
  #17  
Old 04-02-2015, 09:21 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Your grandkids generation is much smarter than you give them credit for.
Let's hope so. But it is not going to be our grandchildren that will rip us apart...
It is our generation and our current leaders. We need a JFK. The only problem the progressives would run him out of town on a rail.
  #18  
Old 04-02-2015, 09:33 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
How do you figure that? Because you said so?

Mrs Clinton is far and away the best qualified candidate of either Party if, indeed, she does becomes a candidate.

If she does - she wins easily.
Other than being married to Bill Clinton, and recognizing that had she never married him we NEVER would have heard of her ... tell us exactly what her qualifications are please.
  #19  
Old 04-02-2015, 09:35 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gee the subject was O'Malley as a candidate VS Clinton. How amazing the thread is completely polluted by the same crap as any other subject.

Conclusion? It does not matter what the subject the antagonizer will take the opposite side while still slamming, degrading, name calling, change the subject, dodge and weave away from the subject matter continuing to bash the opposition.

No matter the subject.

As was proposed some time ago, since we do not have the advantage of an ignore option, just do not engage. The antagonists merry go round, by design, goes....NOWHERE.
  #20  
Old 04-03-2015, 08:32 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Gee the subject was O'Malley as a candidate VS Clinton. How amazing the thread is completely polluted by the same crap as any other subject.

Conclusion? It does not matter what the subject the antagonizer will take the opposite side while still slamming, degrading, name calling, change the subject, dodge and weave away from the subject matter continuing to bash the opposition.

No matter the subject.

As was proposed some time ago, since we do not have the advantage of an ignore option, just do not engage. The antagonists merry go round, by design, goes....NOWHERE.
Good post, especially in this forum! Posters will come to this site and hide behind thier keyboards and say crap they would never say in public or in this forum if they had to use thier real names or TOTV screen name.

It is difficult at best to have an open and thoughtful discussion here (or any of the forums on this site) without the "haters" spewing thier crap!
  #21  
Old 04-03-2015, 08:48 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Well, suck it up and get used to it! The Dumplublicans don't have a cohesive base.
You had to reach pretty far up to come up with that term ... hope you didn't do any internal damage.
  #22  
Old 04-03-2015, 08:56 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Democrats want their candidate to have a decisive win. That is why we are backing Sec. Clinton. O'Malley would not be a certain win. Good man, excellent governor but not enough experience YET. Maybe after being VP.

Clinton is a sure win.

She has the base that Republicans cannot get into their camp because of the Neanderthal thinking of their party. Republicans have not figured these are Progressive times and NOT days of Joe McCarthy.
  #23  
Old 04-03-2015, 10:26 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
these are Progressive times and NOT days of Joe McCarthy.
  #24  
Old 04-03-2015, 10:33 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Sounds as though you long for the days of Tail Gunner Joe.
  #25  
Old 04-03-2015, 10:34 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Do not forget that if you are not progressive, you are regressive. Look that up in your Funk & Wagnall.
  #26  
Old 04-03-2015, 10:44 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I haven't seen one iota of truth to back up the fiction that O'Malley's star is starting to shine brighter. Where are the links? Where is he in the polls?

It is doubtful that O'Malley would ever be considered for a spot in the Clinton cabinet after what he said last week-end about the presidency and dynasties. It's time for O'Malley to find a job.
  #27  
Old 04-03-2015, 10:50 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Hillary Clinton?s New HQ Is ?Brooklyn Cool? -- NYMag


BTW: Now that Hillary Clinton has reportedly signed a lease for her election headquarters, she has only 15 days to announce her candidacy, according to election laws.
  #28  
Old 04-03-2015, 11:24 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Do not forget that if you are not progressive, you are regressive. Look that up in your Funk & Wagnall.
The term "progressive' is nothing more than lipstick-on-a-pig wordsmithing that socialists and egalitarians use to disguise their true intentions
  #29  
Old 04-03-2015, 12:36 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default Just

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
The term "progressive' is nothing more than lipstick-on-a-pig wordsmithing that socialists and egalitarians use to disguise their true intentions
Another wingnut tea partier. My god can't you people even think for yourselves. You must have conference calls with your gang of six to come up with these idiotic statements!
  #30  
Old 04-03-2015, 01:30 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Another wingnut tea partier. My god can't you people even think for yourselves. You must have conference calls with your gang of six to come up with these idiotic statements!
And some appear to do no better than pull their comments outta
their
 

Thread Tools

You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:59 AM.