Originally Posted by Guest

Hillary Clinton's voting record while she was an eight year member of the senate, including bills proposed, bills signed on to, votes taken are all clearly spelled out in the congressional record.

Anyone interested in her positions can look it up, which is more than we can say for Donald Trump's record (of which there is none).

Yes we can look up what she did/didn't do. Not much to read there.

If your mind wasn't closed you would also be able to look up Trumps record. And as far as accomplishments go there is no doubt he makes Clinton look like the amateur phony she is.

Originally Posted by Guest

Hillary is responsible for passing THREE(3) do-nothing bills. That's the extent of her record in congress. Do you want to compare her success to other of congress? Then go and compare The Donald's success compared to other businessmen. Put the two on a scale and you will see that Trump's success is such as to blow Chillary's out of any competition. Shoot, her success in congress doesn't even compare with Cruz's short record in congress.

Like the man said, what good has she done for our country? Not what good she has done for her Clinton family, but what good has she done for America?

Barack Obama didn't have much of a voting record for his four years in the senate, but he still managed to win two presidential elections by landslide victories.

Originally Posted by Guest

Come on. Anytime somebody posts a link to Media Matters or Huffington Post there always is a cry of protest.

Media Matters was organized in order to prevent President Bill Clinton from being impeached demanding only a slight tap on the back of the hand.
Ergo allow the bad actor to continue his bad behavior.

Media Matter since then has had a history replete with supporting and protesting for very bad people and causes.

Media Matters does not matter because they have no credibility.

Originally Posted by Guest

Barack Obama didn't have much of a voting record for his four years in the senate, but he still managed to win two presidential elections by landslide victories.

That has nothing to do with the question of what she has done. One poster bragged about Killary's great record. And the fact is that she has a pathetic record. Yes a do-nothing is in the White House now, and that is the reason we do not want to continue is failed policies. Killary promised to continue his failed policies, so why elect her?

And before you start then bragging about Obama, realize one major factor of his economy. He is the ONLY administration that has never had a GDP growth of 3% or more during his term of office.

Originally Posted by Guest

Barack Obama didn't have much of a voting record for his four years in the senate, but he still managed to win two presidential elections by landslide victories.

The country was destroyed on his watch. On his watch minorities became the majority from age 6 down, whites are a minority. Think VERY carefully about that. Think of what happens everywhere the numbers of minorities increases. Slums, the 3rd world. It IS coming, 30 years max.

Originally Posted by Guest

That has nothing to do with the question of what she has done. One poster bragged about Killary's great record. And the fact is that she has a pathetic record. Yes a do-nothing is in the White House now, and that is the reason we do not want to continue is failed policies. Killary promised to continue his failed policies, so why elect her?

And before you start then bragging about Obama, realize one major factor of his economy. He is the ONLY administration that has never had a GDP growth of 3% or more during his term of office.

He also borrowed over a $ trillion a year to get those miserable results. All the money can't be spent on wars...and banks.

Originally Posted by Guest

Barack Obama didn't have much of a voting record for his four years in the senate, but he still managed to win two presidential elections by landslide victories.

Pretty loosey goosey definitions of what constitutes a landslide?

Neither election win was a landslide!!