Hmmmmm. She may be a pig, but she's a smart pig. In fact, pigs are pretty smart.

BTK, Sorry, I think that's a terrible thing to say about a young woman. I don't care who she is.

:beer2: Here's wishing you half the brains she has.

Let's see. Paris has absolutely no credentials, no training, and no experience in such things as energy conservation. She is very attractive and well-spoken. She is evidently able to read whatever is posted for her on a teleprompter and/or written in a script.

And, of course, she got her big break via a porn flick while Obama got his break in politics because Jeri Ryan objected to going to a porn bar.

Anybody else see a natural connection to Obama? Too bad she's likely too young for VP.

I'll let you know after McCain learns to read a teleprompter or perhaps the difference between the Sunnis and the Shiites.

Originally Posted by chelsea24

I'll let you know after McCain learns to read a teleprompter or perhaps the difference between the Sunnis and the Shiates.

What are Shiates?

Dose udder guys...or an exclamation..such as "holy she-ite". Heck, if our leaders don't know, how should we???

Can anyone name the 57 states that Sen. Obama has visited?

If you're in the mood for some chuckles, here's a link to the McCain master list of gaffs. Its very extensive.

http://www.bi30.org/wordpress/flipflopper.htm

Originally Posted by starflyte1

Can anyone name the 57 states that Sen. Obama has visited?

Yes he does do a marvelous job without a telepromter. Sounds a bit like Mayor Dailey in Chicago :bigthumbsup:

If you're in the mood for some chuckles, here's a link to the McCain master list of gaffs. Its very extensive.
__________________________________________________ _______

But you said we should discuss issues but you dont respond to them ??????

Originally Posted by Bucco

If you're in the mood for some chuckles, here's a link to the McCain master list of gaffs. Its very extensive.
__________________________________________________ _______

But you said we should discuss issues but you dont respond to them ??????

The problem is, you don't bring up real issues, only innuendo.

The problem is, you don't bring up real issues, only innuendo.
__________________________________________________ _____

You must not read very well......in the other thread I have brought up...

....the Global Poverty act which Sen Obama has sponsored in the congress.

....Sen Obama's plan to tax oil companies on their profits

And you continue to say I am calling names which is becoming more and more the norm for Sen Obama supporters

These are just two issues to begin discussing !

Dancer, Ok here is your chance. I'm HOPING you can..
Please describe to me Lord Obamas policies or plans or issues for:
Health care....Change or Hope?
raising taxes...Change or Hope
The war on terrorism...Change or Hope
Energy policy...Change or Hope
The fair act...Change or Hope
On letting GW's tax rate cuts, which have increased revenue to the gov and raised taxes on the RICH to a level higher than Clinton, expire...Change or Hope
The KYOTO treaty...Change or Hope
Gun rights...Change or Hope
Just wondering since all you Lord Obama supporters wont or cant articulate his answers. Ok GO!! Benj

Originally Posted by Bucco

The problem is, you don't bring up real issues, only innuendo.
__________________________________________________ _____

You must not read very well......in the other thread I have brought up...

....the Global Poverty act which Sen Obama has sponsored in the congress.

....Sen Obama's plan to tax oil companies on their profits

And you continue to say I am calling names which is becoming more and more the norm for Sen Obama supporters

These are just two issues to begin discussing !

You must not read very well, or you wouldn't have posted lies about the Global Poverty Act. Your assertion that it would cost US taxpayers billions of dollars (what was your source - Rush Limbaugh?) is patently false. Here is a link you might be interested in reading which provides the facts about the poverty bill.
http://borgenproject.org/globalpovertyact.html In my opinion, it's the right thing to do.

If you want to see his positions on helath care, energy, the war, the economy, etc., just go to his website. I'm not going to do your homework for you.

You must not read very well, or you wouldn't have posted lies about the Global Poverty Act. Your assertion that it would cost US taxpayers billions of dollars (what was your source - Rush Limbaugh?) is patently false. Here is a link you might be interested in reading which provides the facts about the poverty bill.
http://borgenproject.org/globalpovertyact.html In my opinion, it's the right thing to do.

If you want to see his positions on helath care, energy, the war, the economy, etc., just go to his website. I'm not going to do your homework for you.
__________________________________________________ ______________

Your link is certainly questionable at best, and I will admit my figure is an estimate...I hav seen the estimate much much higher, and also a bit lower. I, do however take GREAT ISSUE with you telling me that my dollar figure is "patently false". That is one of those kind of statements that I continue to see from anyone in the Obama camp. To continue to validate the questionablity of your website, it says that both parties are rushing to support. I submit that is not true.

Oh, just to be clear.....the Borgen Project which you cite as your link is a great "idea"..one of those idealistic groups that want to feed the world. I am for that in theory, but I want to choose who I feed and at this point I want it to be in this country, and also do not need anyone in government to redistribute my assets to accomplish thier goal. If that sounds crass, I am sorry. I have worked long and hard for my meager assets and I do not want the Government to touch them or have any say in how I spend them and that is where we seem to be heading.

Oh...for the record I do not, nor have never listened to Rush Limbaugh in my entire life. My source(s) are the official US government records to see what bills are pending...various newspapers throughout the world for FACTS (YOU might check the Chicago papers on some FACTS on Sen Obama), and others (newspapers) for editorial slants from both sides (as I said I am not a Sen McCain supporter.

Finally, for someone who seems to be always critiquing folks saying they are calling names or such, you do a fine job as in each and every post you submit you seem to make some snide remark about Sen McCain or the poster who disagrees with you.

I suggest you use the same self control that you seem to want others to do. I have tried to post with great respect and issued a call to discuss ISSUES. I am met with more of the snide remarks and lack of any response on anything.

As for the other issues, I apologize to you as I misunderstood when you said " We are very tolerant if people want to discuss the issues. If they want to make up lies and spread them around on the internet they are going to hear about it." I "made up no lies"...did not "spread them around"....I simply responded to your challenge to "discuss issues". It appears on this, you only can offer advice to others and are unable to follow through yourself.