A peek into one of the side agreements today?? A peek into one of the side agreements today?? - Page 6 - Talk of The Villages Florida

A peek into one of the side agreements today??

 
Thread Tools
  #76  
Old 08-26-2015, 02:23 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The reason some of us are against the deal is that it does nothing to hinder Iran from getting a nuke, and actually helps them. The side deal suggests that Iran will be able to use their own inspectors to inspect their military sites. Duhhhh!!!
This deal also releases them from sanctions
This deal also gives them back their money. They are already negotiating with Russia for weapons.

Is this enough to get you started? What did we get? Ahhh, does nothing sound fair? Not even a handshake and a nod. Sorry, but a bad deal is not better than no deal. Personally, it would be better for all of us if Israel just goes ahead and bombs their installations into dust.
  #77  
Old 08-26-2015, 04:06 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

And don't forget to include the words of their supreme leader that they will do whatever they want, produce what ever they want, buy from who ever they want and sell to whoevr they want regardless of ANY agreement.

As Clinton would profoundly state again (I am sure)...WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?
  #78  
Old 08-26-2015, 07:26 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The reason some of us are against the deal is that it does nothing to hinder Iran from getting a nuke, and actually helps them. The side deal suggests that Iran will be able to use their own inspectors to inspect their military sites. Duhhhh!!!

I am sorry. If you don't think that this agreement hinders Iran from getting a nuclear bomb, then you are not looking. The IAEA will have access to all the sites, and they will inspect them all before the date the agreement takes effect. The IAEA will file a report with their finding before the starting date. Since everyone trusts the IAEA, what is the problem?

The supreme leader doesn't run the Iranian government. Do a lot of Iranian wing nuts follow his every word. Yes. It appears that the supreme leader would make a great Republican. If he was an American, he would have to compete with US supreme leader of loud mouth nonsense, Donald Trump.
  #79  
Old 08-26-2015, 09:22 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
The reason some of us are against the deal is that it does nothing to hinder Iran from getting a nuke, and actually helps them. The side deal suggests that Iran will be able to use their own inspectors to inspect their military sites. Duhhhh!!!

I am sorry. If you don't think that this agreement hinders Iran from getting a nuclear bomb, then you are not looking. The IAEA will have access to all the sites, and they will inspect them all before the date the agreement takes effect. The IAEA will file a report with their finding before the starting date. Since everyone trusts the IAEA, what is the problem?

The supreme leader doesn't run the Iranian government. Do a lot of Iranian wing nuts follow his every word. Yes. It appears that the supreme leader would make a great Republican. If he was an American, he would have to compete with US supreme leader of loud mouth nonsense, Donald Trump.
And what affectionate name do you have for the Obama lemmings who epitomize the blind following premise to an incomparable level of obedience.
I would offer some but refuse to stoop to the level some revel in.
  #80  
Old 08-26-2015, 10:31 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What goes around, comes around. I have never started any naming calling. People here make a habit of it. It seems that their entire goal of life is trying to make fun of someone else. When you respond in kind, you are the problem. It doesn't work that way.

Blind following. The Republicans are getting their talking points from their party leaders. They use the same phrases, and same key words for an issue. That is not a coincidence. They vote as a group on almost everything. Democrats are guilty of the same tactic, but not at the level Republicans are operating at.

The Democratic Senators are looking at the Iran agreement in great detail. When they say they are going to vote for it, they explain why, and what research they did to justify their vote.

Republicans are voting against before they even knew what was in it. How can that be acceptable to any reasonable person?
  #81  
Old 08-26-2015, 10:32 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You seem to have forgotten something very important about this Iran agreement.

It will be debated in Congress and put to a vote. If there are enough "yea" votes, it is a done deal. If Congress votes it down, President Obama will veto their decision and Congress does not have enough votes to override his veto.

President Obama wins another one.
  #82  
Old 08-27-2015, 04:50 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
You seem to have forgotten something very important about this Iran agreement.

It will be debated in Congress and put to a vote. If there are enough "yea" votes, it is a done deal. If Congress votes it down, President Obama will veto their decision and Congress does not have enough votes to override his veto.

President Obama wins another one.
Yep, Obama's ego wins, and the country loses. You are typical of one of the crowd that applauded while Nero fiddled as the city burned. Obama will go down in history as "I did it my way." He has never had the majority approval for anything that he has pushed on the country in the entirety of his two terms. Keep clapping your hands, I'm sure that there are others like you. Misery loves company, and liberals are very unhappy and miserable people. They survive only at the cost to others. Live it up because you will be denigrated back to obscurity in 2016.
  #83  
Old 08-27-2015, 07:53 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
You seem to have forgotten something very important about this Iran agreement.

It will be debated in Congress and put to a vote. If there are enough "yea" votes, it is a done deal. If Congress votes it down, President Obama will veto their decision and Congress does not have enough votes to override his veto.

President Obama wins another one.
More accurately stated:

Under this president the majority loses another one!!
  #84  
Old 08-27-2015, 09:03 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
You seem to have forgotten something very important about this Iran agreement.

It will be debated in Congress and put to a vote. If there are enough "yea" votes, it is a done deal. If Congress votes it down, President Obama will veto their decision and Congress does not have enough votes to override his veto.

President Obama wins another one.
President Obama....NOT the country
  #85  
Old 08-27-2015, 11:05 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You are going to have a real problem selling that "I did it my way" to historians. Hind sight is 20/20. They will take into account the opposition on just about everything that he did or proposed.

Never had the approval of anything that he pushed through. Is that right? Extending "W's" tax credit for everyone except the highest bracket, extending unemployment benefits to deal with "W's" great recession, enhanced background checks for gun purchases (85/90% wanted this, the NRA opposed it, and the Republicans went against the wishes of the 85/90%), not giving into the Republicans, who shut down the government because they didn't get their way, bailing out GM, getting the US economy back to somewhat normal (although it took too long), killing Bin Lardin(sp)

The two big ones out there that the outcome has yet to be determined, immigration reform, and the Iran deal. If these two succeed given all the Republican opposition, his place will be in the to 60% of American president.

Liberals are unhappy. Take a good look at your posts. If you are happy, you sure are hiding it well. Republicans are so full of hate that it takes next to nothing to set them off.
  #86  
Old 08-27-2015, 01:16 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
You are going to have a real problem selling that "I did it my way" to historians. Hind sight is 20/20. They will take into account the opposition on just about everything that he did or proposed.

Never had the approval of anything that he pushed through. Is that right? Extending "W's" tax credit for everyone except the highest bracket, extending unemployment benefits to deal with "W's" great recession, enhanced background checks for gun purchases (85/90% wanted this, the NRA opposed it, and the Republicans went against the wishes of the 85/90%), not giving into the Republicans, who shut down the government because they didn't get their way, bailing out GM, getting the US economy back to somewhat normal (although it took too long), killing Bin Lardin(sp)

The two big ones out there that the outcome has yet to be determined, immigration reform, and the Iran deal. If these two succeed given all the Republican opposition, his place will be in the to 60% of American president.

Liberals are unhappy. Take a good look at your posts. If you are happy, you sure are hiding it well. Republicans are so full of hate that it takes next to nothing to set them off.
Gotta love the way you sling the term "hate" around like a petulant child. SO peevish and prissy. I enjoy the laugh you cause every time you comment. Sorry if no one takes you seriously.
  #87  
Old 08-27-2015, 01:57 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I am really glad a person like you doesn't take me seriously. You must the person that that said Obama has never had majority support for anything. So, why would anybody take you seriously?
 

Tags
iran, today, sites, side, agreements, capable, stated, organization, fully, participation, handling, inspection, leader, planet, negotiator, a$$, dumb, witnessing, actual, biggest, suspected, content, inspect, announced, peek


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:09 PM.