Originally Posted by Guest

Its very easy to change as I've messed with Wikipedia before to see how it works. You don't have to have reliable sources, just be able to cite a source which can be any BS website that is unreliable to begin with.

You got a link to a wiki site you changed. I'd like to read it.

Originally Posted by Guest

You got a link to a wiki site you changed. I'd like to read it.

Oh i don't even recall what it was I was messing with, this was like a year ago.

Originally Posted by Guest

Marina Abramović - Wikipedia

She is a very difficult artist to appreciate. When she divorced her husband they each got on opposite ends of the Great Wall of China and walked towards each other and when they met they were divorced.

Which means, she's not much of an artist.

What a stupid thing to do. Unless you're an "artist" who can take off for months at a time because fools buy your "work" for WAY too much money.

Originally Posted by Guest

DO YOU PEOPLE EVER...EVER....EVER...EVER CARE about your sources ?

DO YOU PEOPLE EVER...EVER...EVER read anything but this garbage...pick up a copy of the National Enquirer....and frankly it may be more accurate !!!

DO YOU KNOW HOW YOU POISON YOUR MIND WITH THIS CRAP...AND CRAP IS THE NICEST I CAN THINK OF.

Would you call the mainstream media "reliable"? I don't think the real truth is available ANYWHERE. I think it's ALL slanted one way or another. I know for a fact the "news" can be anything but.

Originally Posted by Guest

Which means, she's not much of an artist.

What a stupid thing to do. Unless you're an "artist" who can take off for months at a time because fools buy your "work" for WAY too much money.



Would you call the mainstream media "reliable"? I don't think the real truth is available ANYWHERE. I think it's ALL slanted one way or another. I know for a fact the "news" can be anything but.

If you are saying there is no truth, sorry you are wrong.

Truth is there, and using this forum as an example...truth is there but sometimes it is not what you want. If you only want YOUR truth, that is a problem.

We have become lazy and self centered in this country. The only effort we make is to validate OUR own truth. Media does not lie, but surely that truth comes wrapped in different wrappers and in many cases uses very deceptive headlines to "get you"

I feel a responsibility to present links and what I consider credible sources. I will not allow something sent to me by a person or org. To lead me to something to read. If I want facts and truth it is MY responsibility, so...this general condemnation of the "media" is not only insulting but serving a purpose for certain people or groups. It has roots in historical periods if you look it up..might scare you.

Originally Posted by Rockyrd

If you are saying there is no truth, sorry you are wrong.

Truth is there, and using this forum as an example...truth is there but sometimes it is not what you want. If you only want YOUR truth, that is a problem.

We have become lazy and self centered in this country. The only effort we make is to validate OUR own truth. Media does not lie, but surely that truth comes wrapped in different wrappers and in many cases uses very deceptive headlines to "get you"

I feel a responsibility to present links and what I consider credible sources. I will not allow something sent to me by a person or org. To lead me to something to read. If I want facts and truth it is MY responsibility, so...this general condemnation of the "media" is not only insulting but serving a purpose for certain people or groups. It has roots in historical periods if you look it up..might scare you.

Are u the one that said 100% of economists rejected trumps fiscal plan? 100%!

Originally Posted by Guest

Are u the one that said 100% of economists rejected trumps fiscal plan? 100%!

Nothing is 100% or at least most are not.

I read and reread economists across the country and how they viewed his proposals,...like

"Donald Trump’s sums do not add up"

From the Economist

What plan?: Donald Trump’s sums do not add up | The Economist

And...

"Debate Cheat Sheet: Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton on the Debate Cheat Sheet: Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton on the Economy

From WSJ

Debate Cheat Sheet: Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton on the Economy - Real Time Economics - WSJ


"Economists savage Trump's economic agenda"

Donald Trump 2016 economic agenda: Economists savage Trump's economic agenda - POLITICO

I am hoping that your question will lead to an actual discussion of both candidates proposals which is alway my goal, but in the past just got a bunch of snide comments.

We will see how this goes.

But then again, I do not think there is a cartoon that outlines economic policy proposals and cutting and pasting pics is your forte