Suits Wiki | FANDOM powered by Wikia

I never got interested in the series Suits which features this woman. Rachel Zane | Suits Wiki | FANDOM powered by Wikia

Originally Posted by Guest

I hope I never meet this poster !! What a moron !!!

We have different opinions...why the need for name calling?

Would you like to debate the merits of black people new guy?

You can start out by listing all the GOOD they've brought to the world...and then I'll list the cons...we'll see who the "moron" is.

Great parents!

"According to UK Daily Mail, both of Meghan’s parents have filed for bankruptcy; her mother in 2002 “over a $52,750 credit card bill.” Her father is a lighting director thought to be in Mexico, reports Daily Mail. "

"Samantha Grant called Meghan “narcissistic and selfish,” UK Daily Mail reports. According to The Sun, Grant is planning a tell-all book on the family."

"UK Express reported in January 2017 that “Thomas Markle Jr, 50, has been charged with menacing, pointing a firearm at someone and unlawful use of a weapon, according to police.”"

Great family...NOT!

This is a POLITICAL marriage! To keep the minorities at bay.

Originally Posted by Guest

We have different opinions...why the need for name calling?

Would you like to debate the merits of black people new guy?

You can start out by listing all the GOOD they've brought to the world...and then I'll list the cons...we'll see who the "moron" is.

The same problem as always. You look at people from what they are as an individual and not by some society imposed label like "black".

Originally Posted by Guest

The same problem as always. You look at people from what they are as an individual and not by some society imposed label like "black".

Guess you missed the post before yours...

Great parents!

"According to UK Daily Mail, both of Meghan’s parents have filed for bankruptcy; her mother in 2002 “over a $52,750 credit card bill.” Her father is a lighting director thought to be in Mexico, reports Daily Mail. "

"Samantha Grant called Meghan “narcissistic and selfish,” UK Daily Mail reports. According to The Sun, Grant is planning a tell-all book on the family."

"UK Express reported in January 2017 that “Thomas Markle Jr, 50, has been charged with menacing, pointing a firearm at someone and unlawful use of a weapon, according to police.”"

She's scum...she's a user...she uses her looks to get things. Her family is scum.

This IS a political marriage...it brings the brown people into the family...so they won't attack. England's demographics are changing too...and the brown minorities are questioning a WHITE monarchy.

Think people!

I guess the Queen gave up after Diana, Fergie, and Kate. Now ANYTHING goes!

The end of the bloodline.

Originally Posted by Guest

Harry its not going to last

Personal Best Regards:

Harry has no change at the crown, so it don't make now difference who he marries. I will be also surprised if will last with the little gold digger actor.

Originally Posted by Guest

Guess you missed the post before yours...

Great parents!

"According to UK Daily Mail, both of Meghan’s parents have filed for bankruptcy; her mother in 2002 “over a $52,750 credit card bill.” Her father is a lighting director thought to be in Mexico, reports Daily Mail. "

"Samantha Grant called Meghan “narcissistic and selfish,” UK Daily Mail reports. According to The Sun, Grant is planning a tell-all book on the family."

"UK Express reported in January 2017 that “Thomas Markle Jr, 50, has been charged with menacing, pointing a firearm at someone and unlawful use of a weapon, according to police.”"

She's scum...she's a user...she uses her looks to get things. Her family is scum.

This IS a political marriage...it brings the brown people into the family...so they won't attack. England's demographics are changing too...and the brown minorities are questioning a WHITE monarchy.

Think people!

I guess the Queen gave up after Diana, Fergie, and Kate. Now ANYTHING goes!

The end of the bloodline.

Harry has zero change at the crown or any his heir line. The blood line is safe. About time for house change anyway?

What I disagree with the current administration of TOTV is the fact they have allowed and continue to allow pornographic discussion.
When the return of the political forum was addressed a few years back it was decided to make it opt in and no moderator monitoring.

Back then the worst we had to deal with was personal attacks....which were supposedly addressed by the opt in "enter at your own risk" conditions.

Since then and mostly the past 12-18 months the antagonists, slowly and methodically have been testing how far they could go with not only verbal attacks but now include extreme vulgar language including the the full blown pornographic say anything with abandon being permitted.

This thread contains the typical pornographic dialogue that is now condoned and acceptable to "the management" of TOTV.

Why has this been allowed?
Allowed to continue?

Why is there no penalty to the minority number of abusers?
Why are the abusers not being banished?
Why is their pornography being allowed to remain.....for all to see?
The verbal pornography is no less offensive than the full length porn picture of a few days ago.

Beating dead horse. Opt out

Originally Posted by Guest

What I disagree with the current administration of TOTV is the fact they have allowed and continue to allow pornographic discussion.
When the return of the political forum was addressed a few years back it was decided to make it opt in and no moderator monitoring.

Back then the worst we had to deal with was personal attacks....which were supposedly addressed by the opt in "enter at your own risk" conditions.

Since then and mostly the past 12-18 months the antagonists, slowly and methodically have been testing how far they could go with not only verbal attacks but now include extreme vulgar language including the the full blown pornographic say anything with abandon being permitted.

This thread contains the typical pornographic dialogue that is now condoned and acceptable to "the management" of TOTV.

Why has this been allowed?
Allowed to continue?

Why is there no penalty to the minority number of abusers?
Why are the abusers not being banished?
Why is their pornography being allowed to remain.....for all to see?
The verbal pornography is no less offensive than the full length porn picture of a few days ago.

There probably is change coming.

Opt out....and run from right allowing wrong...not in my day(s)!

Originally Posted by Guest

What I disagree with the current administration of TOTV is the fact they have allowed and continue to allow pornographic discussion.
When the return of the political forum was addressed a few years back it was decided to make it opt in and no moderator monitoring.

Back then the worst we had to deal with was personal attacks....which were supposedly addressed by the opt in "enter at your own risk" conditions.

Since then and mostly the past 12-18 months the antagonists, slowly and methodically have been testing how far they could go with not only verbal attacks but now include extreme vulgar language including the the full blown pornographic say anything with abandon being permitted.

This thread contains the typical pornographic dialogue that is now condoned and acceptable to "the management" of TOTV.

Why has this been allowed?
Allowed to continue?

Why is there no penalty to the minority number of abusers?
Why are the abusers not being banished?
Why is their pornography being allowed to remain.....for all to see?
The verbal pornography is no less offensive than the full length porn picture of a few days ago.

You whiny f@cking b!tch bille...WTF? Are you a 7 y/o girl running to mommy because your older brother cursed?

Go hang out with the other girls...you DO have your OWN f@cking forum to talk about "happy thoughts".

Originally Posted by billethkid

What I disagree with the current administration of TOTV is the fact they have allowed and continue to allow pornographic discussion.
When the return of the political forum was addressed a few years back it was decided to make it opt in and no moderator monitoring.

Back then the worst we had to deal with was personal attacks....which were supposedly addressed by the opt in "enter at your own risk" conditions.

Since then and mostly the past 12-18 months the antagonists, slowly and methodically have been testing how far they could go with not only verbal attacks but now include extreme vulgar language including the the full blown pornographic say anything with abandon being permitted.

This thread contains the typical pornographic dialogue that is now condoned and acceptable to "the management" of TOTV.

Why has this been allowed?
Allowed to continue?

Why is there no penalty to the minority number of abusers?
Why are the abusers not being banished?
Why is their pornography being allowed to remain.....for all to see?
The verbal pornography is no less offensive than the full length porn picture of a few days ago.

You are one angry bird.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

She'll be another big fat Nidger soon but Harry won't have to suffer it cause the cunt will dump Him for riches real quick like...

she probably tells Harry, this'll only hurt for a little while i'll only put the head of it in, i promise i'll never cum in your mouth........

Reminds me of the bit that Howard Stern did on radio after Michael Jackson married Lisa Marie Presley. It was shortly after he went on Sirius Radio. A real crack up.