Originally Posted by RichieLion

Are you arguing against his First Amendment Rights also? (couldn't resist this one)

LOL! No

He has his First Ammendment rights just as anyone else does. And advertisers have theirs just as the radio syndicators have theirs.

Originally Posted by rubicon

villager II: Respectfully and honestly I am trying to understand how by expressing hate via of telling jokes is any less evil and any less hateful than straight hateful speech? The delivery may be different but the intent is the same. IMHO the joke teller is worse because he/she adds an element of apathy. As defined, the opposite of love is not hate but rather indifference...and indifference suggests that the target of hate is non-human.
I would rather have someone hate me than be indifferent to me ....say as the Nazi were toward the Jews.

Hope you are having a good day..

I shot 37 at pelican today. It dont get any worse than that. I could not hit a single green.

Originally Posted by The Villager II

Have I ever mentioned that I think Limbaugh is a low life disgusting pig with no respect for human life and is proof that some pregnancies should not go full term. Sorry if this is a duplicate post. Now before some one slams me for NO RESPECT FOR HUMAN LIFE and SHOULD NOT GO FULL TERM in the same sentence, keep in mind that anyone that says the things he does publicly, proves that he is a few ingredients short of a Human Being.

This is an post that show little intelligence Villager. Everybody knows you don't like him, and that is your prerogative, but when you write a post like this you have shown yourself to be much worse than anything Rush has ever said or written.

Don't know if you mean to do this, but look in a mirror once in a while.

Originally Posted by Bavarian

Not in the Constitution, cite the Article if you think it is. The "Right to Privacy" was invented by SCUSA in 1973 by breathing in the vapors comming off the Constitution. That way they decided Roe vs. Wade and Doe vs. Bolton to allow people to cut up little unborn babies, spray them with acid or suck out their brains.

The Pro-Aborts are against ultrasound tests of women planning to kill their unborn baby because on average 94% of those who see their unborn baby on the ultrasound picture change their mind.

Our Lady of Fatima, Pray for Us!

You are absolutely right...EXCEPT, 99.9% of all abortion facilities ALREADY perform an ultrasound prior to the abortion-to determine the exact stage of the pregnancy. The difference would be that they will b e required o show the images to the mother. and YES, OVER 94% of those who see the unborn baby change their mind. BECAUSE they see that the FETUS is not just a blob of tissue!!!

Bill Maher-Obama's Million Dollar Man-




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ISKQ... Man - YouTube

The link below is a site that was sent to me and it is pretty much all validated with video, etc on statements made about Palin, Bachmann and a few others......WARNING..the language is really rough and reference to many woman body parts...so be WARNED...

The left’s respect for women: a look back | The Daily Caller

Originally Posted by RichieLion

This is an post that show little intelligence Villager. Everybody knows you don't like him, and that is your prerogative, but when you write a post like this you have shown yourself to be much worse than anything Rush has ever said or written.

Don't know if you mean to do this, but look in a mirror once in a while.

Now sweaty, no need to get in a tizzy over a little ole post.

Originally Posted by Bucco

The link below is a site that was sent to me and it is pretty much all validated with video, etc on statements made about Palin, Bachmann and a few others......WARNING..the language is really rough and reference to many woman body parts...so be WARNED...

The left’s respect for women: a look back | The Daily Caller

All are repulsive. Where is the

Originally Posted by The Villager II

Now sweaty, no need to get in a tizzy over a little ole post.

It's just that you seem to post the most hateful and malicious things imaginable about a person while decrying their hate or malice.

It makes no sense and reflects badly on you. I wish you would see it.

Originally Posted by RichieLion

It's just that you seem to post the most hateful and malicious things imaginable about a person while decrying their hate or malice.

It makes no sense and reflects badly on you. I wish you would see it.

OK. I would love to stop posting like that, but I fear if I show any weakness at all, you will use your word smith abilities to insult and harass me into a heart attack. I will watch this post to see how you respond to my offer to tone it down.

Originally Posted by The Villager II

OK. I would love to stop posting like that, but I fear if I show any weakness at all, you will use your word smith abilities to insult and harass me into a heart attack. I will watch this post to see how you respond to my offer to tone it down.

Where did you offer to do that? I don't read that anywhere.

Originally Posted by RichieLion

Where did you offer to do that? I don't read that anywhere.

You miss a lot while your word smithing sarcasum.

Regarding Rush - the customers of his sponsors have spoken loud and clear, and the advertisers have reacted by dumping him. Next, he will have his pants sued off. I hope he is requested to post a photo of that on the internet. BARF
IMHO

Originally Posted by RichieLion

Where did you offer to do that? I don't read that anywhere.

Originally Posted by The Villager II

You miss a lot while your word smithing sarcasum.

I don't think I missed anything. I don't see anywhere in your previous posts where you offered to tone it down. If you did, point it out. I'd really like to see where you did that.

(By the way, I'm complimented that you keep calling me "wordsmith". I like it; it does me no disservice. It's hardly pejorative.

wordsmith: educated person, intellectual, literary craftsman, literary scholar, litterateur, savant, scholar, walking encyclopedia

Originally Posted by RichieLion

I don't think I missed anything. I don't see anywhere in your previous posts where you offered to tone it down. If you did, point it out. I'd really like to see where you did that.

(By the way, I'm complimented that you keep calling me "wordsmith". I like it; it does me no disservice. It's hardly pejorative.

wordsmith: educated person, intellectual, literary craftsman, literary scholar, litterateur, savant, scholar, walking encyclopedia

It was not meant to be offensive. You are in fact very good at creating sarcasm through your use of words. I find it a bit beneath anyone to use that ability to harm rather than do good deeds with it, but each to his own. You should have noticed that I have toned it down a lot due to posts by Rubicon and Bucco. They have shown me the right way to go rather than being sarcastic. They, like me talk straight and not silly sarcasm. Sorry that you thought I was not being kind when calling you a Word Smith. It was meant with the utmost respect for your offbeat, but skilled talent.