Originally Posted by Guest

Whatever Rubio says about anything is irrelevant - he has as much chance of winning the nomination, let alone being elected, as Junior did finding any WMD's.

You liberals would be better off with Rubio as president than Trump. And you know that the Democrat establishment writing on the way says that they will not allow Hillary or Sanders to get the election. They will ultimately sacrifice the election to the GOP rather than have either of the two as president. SO, you might want to think on that. Why do you think Bloomie is getting ready to run as an Independent? To take away the wining vote of either Democrat candidate.

The Trumpster still is my boy for the Floriduh primary. The idea is to get him to win primaries, have the RNC diss him by not having him as their nominee, Trumpster will go third party and Hillary wins!

It was the plan all along!

Originally Posted by Guest

The Trumpster still is my boy for the Floriduh primary. The idea is to get him to win primaries, have the RNC diss him by not having him as their nominee, Trumpster will go third party and Hillary wins!

It was the plan all along!

Sounds good! Just one question----why would anyone with even 2 functional brain cells want Hilary to win?

Originally Posted by Guest

Sounds good! Just one question----why would anyone with even 2 functional brain cells want Hilary to win?

Because she is a Democrat. It is that simple.

Originally Posted by Guest

Sounds good! Just one question----why would anyone with even 2 functional brain cells want Hilary to win?

Because he is an idiot? But, he is just a kid playing with the adults. Everyone with the IQ of a water balloon knows that liberals don't have enough motivation to follow his juvenile scheme. Even if they were intelligent enough to understand his idea, they would just laugh at him.

Originally Posted by Guest

Ah, I know what repeal means, but I have yet to see his quote where he used that term. Taking a bit of leeway with the truth, are you? I'm sure you can find it, right? Or, did someone tell you this and you repeated like the liberal sheeple have a tendency to do?

sheeple?

"Taking a bit of leeway with the truth"

Since you do not know how, or are to lazy to search on the internet, I will do it for you. Know what your commenting about before you do, it shows you are a buffoon.

Marco Rubio Suggests His Supreme Court Would Roll Back Marriage Equality

Originally Posted by Guest

Sounds good! Just one question----why would anyone with even 2 functional brain cells want Hilary to win?

Thats one more than you have lol

Originally Posted by Guest

Thats one more than you have lol

Could be---one never knows, do one?

BTW, thank you for the nostalgia---I haven't heard a retort like yours since kindergarten

Originally Posted by Guest

sheeple?

"Taking a bit of leeway with the truth"

Since you do not know how, or are to lazy to search on the internet, I will do it for you. Know what your commenting about before you do, it shows you are a buffoon.

Marco Rubio Suggests His Supreme Court Would Roll Back Marriage Equality

You are still disregarding the original statement you(?) made. You used the word REPEAL. Once again, you take liberties with the truth. What good does Google do YOU if you have no reading comprehension? He did NOT use the term or suggest the usage of "REPEAL." Sorry, but don't get mad at me for correcting you SEVERAL times. It is you that is at fault with your interpretation of reality. Twisting something someone says is slander. I doubt you are blatant in your wish to pervert his words, but you should be careful when you attempt to paraphrase someone you don't like.

I would have no problem with a REPEAL, because I agree with his definition of marriage. You see, in many states the definition of marriage is between one man and one woman. Rubio is saying that the constitution allows the individual states to make that law, not the federal government. I believe it is the tenth amendment? Part of the Bill or Rights, I think.

If you happen to find a quote saying he is going to REPEAL then I will stand corrected. It is not up to me to search for it, as I did not make that claim. So, have a great day.

Originally Posted by Guest

You are still disregarding the original statement you(?) made. You used the word REPEAL. Once again, you take liberties with the truth. What good does Google do YOU if you have no reading comprehension? He did NOT use the term or suggest the usage of "REPEAL." Sorry, but don't get mad at me for correcting you SEVERAL times. It is you that is at fault with your interpretation of reality. Twisting something someone says is slander. I doubt you are blatant in your wish to pervert his words, but you should be careful when you attempt to paraphrase someone you don't like.

I would have no problem with a REPEAL, because I agree with his definition of marriage. You see, in many states the definition of marriage is between one man and one woman. Rubio is saying that the constitution allows the individual states to make that law, not the federal government. I believe it is the tenth amendment? Part of the Bill or Rights, I think.

If you happen to find a quote saying he is going to REPEAL then I will stand corrected. It is not up to me to search for it, as I did not make that claim. So, have a great day.

I believe it is the tenth amendment? Part of the Bill or Rights, I think.

Please proof read your comment. Also "I think" , don't you know?

Originally Posted by Guest

I believe it is the tenth amendment? Part of the Bill or Rights, I think.

Please proof read your comment. Also "I think" , don't you know?

Well, I'll tell you what. How about I change the subject or chose one of your adverbs to discuss, instead of addressing the subject. Are you that far defeated that you can't stay on topic? When ever someone answers your stupid questions or makes a comment about the subject, you seem to feel that you need to draw attention to you with a totally lame reply. A reply having nothing to do with politics. Either an attack on a poster or diverting to discussing punctuation. So my friend, get a life and go play with yourself, because you are not impressing anyone except yourself.

Originally Posted by Guest

You liberals would be better off with Rubio as president than Trump. And you know that the Democrat establishment writing on the way says that they will not allow Hillary or Sanders to get the election. They will ultimately sacrifice the election to the GOP rather than have either of the two as president. SO, you might want to think on that. Why do you think Bloomie is getting ready to run as an Independent? To take away the wining vote of either Democrat candidate.

And why do you think Trump is threatening to run an independent campaign?

If Trump does run as an independent the R Party will become a minor Party

You might want to think on that.

Trump wins SC and he'll run the table

Originally Posted by Guest

The Supreme Court ruled that same sex marriage is legal in all the USA.

Rubio was saying today when (?) he is President, he will repeal that. Obviously, he does not realize the law of the land as pronounced by the Supreme Court cannot be repealled by the President or Congress.

I think the only way would be a Constitutional amendment that would take ratification by 3/4 of the states.

You would think that a presidential candidate would know that but maybe he is just counting on enough ignorant voters not to know what a president can and cannot do.

Yelp! Trying to get few liberal votes. The smart ones!


Isn't some members on the Supreme Court gay if so how could they rule without it being conflict of interest? Also Cala voted out gay marriage and district court judge if I remember correctly was known gay over ruled the voters. NO JUDGE gay or straight should be allowed to over rule voters on they're special interest. This is why term limits need to be on circuit, especially Supreme Court, and of course congress. No way to get rid of them even if they're 95. Don't say age discrimination cause it in other career jobs like airline pilots, military high year tenure ext..

Originally Posted by Guest

Yelp! Trying to get few liberal votes. The smart ones!


Isn't some members on the Supreme Court gay if so how could they rule without it being conflict of interest? Also Cala voted out gay marriage and district court judge if I remember correctly was known gay over ruled the voters. NO JUDGE gay or straight should be allowed to over rule voters on they're special interest. This is why term limits need to be on circuit, especially Supreme Court, and of course congress. No way to get rid of them even if they're 95. Don't say age discrimination cause it in other career jobs like airline pilots, military high year tenure ext..

We already have term limits in Congress - their called elections.

Why does anyone want Gay Marriage to be repealed?

What harm has this done in the country? Many long term, 30+ years, couples are getting married. At this time in life its all about getting the estate in order.

The sky hasn't fallen.....