Originally Posted by Guest

Have you looked at her tax plan? Actually My Villages home is just one of many. I have beach properties as well. I bought here because I like it here. It has zero to do with my net worth. I do not bitch about my success, I celebrate it and thank God every day every day and I share it with others. I do not need the Government to redistribute it for me. I saw what happened to the trillion in Stimulus which never made it to the shovel ready projects so Hollary is trying it again. I see from your comments that you are fooled again.

We are honored to be in your company.

The top 0.1 percent was composed of 160,000 families with average wealth of $72.8 million. All told, they owned 22 percent of the nation’s wealth.

Meanwhile, the bottom 90 percent -- 144 million families with average wealth of $84,000 -- owned only 22.8 percent of the wealth.

Where did the middle class go? The old ones, boomers went to the villages.

Originally Posted by Guest

Maybe you should go back and look at his post. He was crying that his taxes were going to go up to pay for Hillary's programs. That is not the case.

Maybe you haven't caught all politicians forever have been lying. It is the nature of the beast. "Lying" maybe be a too strong a word, but probably not. They present numbers to back up their proposals that always can be questioned. They make assumption to suit their needs.

Hillary's programs have been look at by independent group. Her proposals increase the debt under 500 billion over ten years. Trump proposals will increase the debt 7 to 9 trillion over ten years. Don't worry Trump will revise his proposals, and say he was just kidding with the first proposals. He had to get everyone's attention.

Rule one in politics say anything or do anything to get elected. Then run for reelection on your record. Lying certainly falls into the anything category.

Maybe you should look at my original post and stop distorting it. Hillary will make all of us pay again for things we already paid for raising and educating our own families.

Originally Posted by Guest

We are honored to be in your company.

The top 0.1 percent was composed of 160,000 families with average wealth of $72.8 million. All told, they owned 22 percent of the nation’s wealth.

Meanwhile, the bottom 90 percent -- 144 million families with average wealth of $84,000 -- owned only 22.8 percent of the wealth.

Where did the middle class go? The old ones, boomers went to the villages.

Maybe this will answer part of it.


Workers have not seen increases in wages in the last 20 years which coincides somewhat what the creation of The Village raising your child. The reality is that we pushed married women into the workforce at an alarming rate and employers took full of advantage of this. The concept of supply and demand works 100% of the time so the more workers the lower the salaries. As costs began to rise out pacing wages, the mantra became that we need two people to carry the load which in essence was an accurate statement. However had not two members of the family been working, there would've been fewer workers and higher salaries, perhaps as much as 50% higher. Add this It is to lower tax brackets and lower taxes and no need for expensive childcare etc. and we would have been better off in the system that worked for a hundred years where one family member stayed home to raise the family and not be put in the Village Day Care where you drop your kids off to be handled ( not nurtured) by some of the lowest paid workers in Society where turnover rates are horrific.

Women's liberation has been a disaster for our country and the financial effects are still being felt. You notice the word Liberation is no longer used since no one was liberated while kids are in prison like Day Care away from their mothers.

Supporters of Women's Liberation were saying they wanted equal rights not special rights however they are continually demanding special rights such as the cost of raising children (FREE PRE K, DAY CARE, AFTER SCHOOL, ETC.)has been transferred to all taxpayers especially seniors, instead of remaining with the family.

How ironic is it that the only mothers you see taking care of their children are those immigrant women who are having loads of kids supported by government largess while The modern woman is limiting the number of children she has and at the age of three months turns them over to someone else to race.

Originally Posted by Guest

Maybe this will answer part of it.


Workers have not seen increases in wages in the last 20 years which coincides somewhat what the creation of The Village raising your child. The reality is that we pushed married women into the workforce at an alarming rate and employers took full of advantage of this. The concept of supply and demand works 100% of the time so the more workers the lower the salaries. As costs began to rise out pacing wages, the mantra became that we need two people to carry the load which in essence was an accurate statement. However had not two members of the family been working, there would've been fewer workers and higher salaries, perhaps as much as 50% higher. Add this It is to lower tax brackets and lower taxes and no need for expensive childcare etc. and we would have been better off in the system that worked for a hundred years where one family member stayed home to raise the family and not be put in the Village Day Care where you drop your kids off to be handled ( not nurtured) by some of the lowest paid workers in Society where turnover rates are horrific.

Women's liberation has been a disaster for our country and the financial effects are still being felt. You notice the word Liberation is no longer used since no one was liberated while kids are in prison like Day Care away from their mothers.

Supporters of Women's Liberation were saying they wanted equal rights not special rights however they are continually demanding special rights such as the cost of raising children (FREE PRE K, DAY CARE, AFTER SCHOOL, ETC.)has been transferred to all taxpayers especially seniors, instead of remaining with the family.

How ironic is it that the only mothers you see taking care of their children are those immigrant women who are having loads of kids supported by government largess while The modern woman is limiting the number of children she has and at the age of three months turns them over to someone else to race.

Your head is stuck where the sun don't shine. Keep it there.

Uncle Junior

Originally Posted by Guest

What we know about illegal immigration from Mexico | Pew Research Center

Do you ever do any reading?

The head and the ass thing. Are you joking or being sarcastic? It's hard to tell anymore.

That's about the biggest bull**** I've ever read. So, drops few hundred thousand, STILL millions hopping the border. And guess what parties they will evidently vote for? the pandering party for votes. DEMORATS.

Originally Posted by Guest

We now live on country that's giving everything away for votes. There no stopping it. You can't compete with free and open borders. All for the democrat to have TOTAL control.

From age 6 down...minorities are the majority

Originally Posted by Guest

What we know about illegal immigration from Mexico | Pew Research Center

Do you ever do any reading?

The head and the ass thing. Are you joking or being sarcastic? It's hard to tell anymore.

Hispanics are the MAJORITY from age 6 down.

Originally Posted by Guest

Maybe this will answer part of it.


Workers have not seen increases in wages in the last 20 years which coincides somewhat what the creation of The Village raising your child. The reality is that we pushed married women into the workforce at an alarming rate and employers took full of advantage of this. The concept of supply and demand works 100% of the time so the more workers the lower the salaries. As costs began to rise out pacing wages, the mantra became that we need two people to carry the load which in essence was an accurate statement. However had not two members of the family been working, there would've been fewer workers and higher salaries, perhaps as much as 50% higher. Add this It is to lower tax brackets and lower taxes and no need for expensive childcare etc. and we would have been better off in the system that worked for a hundred years where one family member stayed home to raise the family and not be put in the Village Day Care where you drop your kids off to be handled ( not nurtured) by some of the lowest paid workers in Society where turnover rates are horrific.

Women's liberation has been a disaster for our country and the financial effects are still being felt. You notice the word Liberation is no longer used since no one was liberated while kids are in prison like Day Care away from their mothers.

Supporters of Women's Liberation were saying they wanted equal rights not special rights however they are continually demanding special rights such as the cost of raising children (FREE PRE K, DAY CARE, AFTER SCHOOL, ETC.)has been transferred to all taxpayers especially seniors, instead of remaining with the family.

How ironic is it that the only mothers you see taking care of their children are those immigrant women who are having loads of kids supported by government largess while The modern woman is limiting the number of children she has and at the age of three months turns them over to someone else to race.

Yup, a 3rd world loser is RAISING our children!

Yes, it has been a DISASTER...nothing is BETTER now compared to then.

They want their cake AND eat it too. They want "wquality" and also keep their "feminine perks".

Immigrants, 3rd worlders are raising, teaching our kids.

Originally Posted by Guest

That's about the biggest bull**** I've ever read. So, drops few hundred thousand, STILL millions hopping the border. And guess what parties they will evidently vote for? the pandering party for votes. DEMORATS.

They're breeding us out!

Thay keep harping on "illegals" that are here. They don't mention the millions and millions of anchor babies that are "citizens". We're being invaded, below age 6 THEY are the MAJORITY.

Originally Posted by Guest

That's about the biggest bull**** I've ever read. So, drops few hundred thousand, STILL millions hopping the border. And guess what parties they will evidently vote for? the pandering party for votes. DEMORATS.

So, is your sky falling? You don't feel safe?

Originally Posted by Guest

So, is your sky falling? You don't feel safe?

It is...hispanics are the MAJORITY from age 6 down.

Not outside the bubble...the country is becoming "seedy" as minorities become the majority.

Originally Posted by Guest

Obama is about to proceed with waiving government school loans that going to cost taxpayers in the millions and millions. The basis for forgiveness is that these students claim that they could not get a job. A college education use to be solely to teach kids how to think that is education for the sake of education itself.

Personal Best Regards:

Yes, but you love trump giving the 1% a big tax break. Who do you think is going to pay for it, it's you. Oh, trickle down will do it LOL ask Kansas about that.

We are a Nation heading full tilt toward perpetual single party rule . Same as in other totalitarian states .

Originally Posted by Guest

Maybe you should look at my original post and stop distorting it. Hillary will make all of us pay again for things we already paid for raising and educating our own families.

I did look at your original post. It said, "All of which we will pay through increased taxes." We-increased taxes. She is funding her proposals through increased taxes on the rich. Not us.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/13/up...axes.html?_r=0

Both tax plans are there. Take a look at the income level that the tax rate will increase. Why do you think that your taxes are going to increase? Why do you think services provided to seniors will be reduced? If I missing something point it out?

Originally Posted by Guest

I did look at your original post. It said, "All of which we will pay through increased taxes." We-increased taxes. She is funding her proposals through increased taxes on the rich. Not us.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/13/up...axes.html?_r=0

Both tax plans are there. Take a look at the income level that the tax rate will increase. Why do you think that your taxes are going to increase? Why do you think services provided to seniors will be reduced? If I missing something point it out?

You are missing the whole point. Most of us worked a lifetime to provide for our families, NOT for somebody else's. THEY should provide for themselves. If they need something basic to survive--food, shelter, medicine--I'm happy to help. But large screen TVs, cell phones, filet mignon, pick up trucks and college are NOT necessities to survive. What is necessary is for them to get off their butts and WORK for what they want.

Originally Posted by Guest

I did look at your original post. It said, "All of which we will pay through increased taxes." We-increased taxes. She is funding her proposals through increased taxes on the rich. Not us.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/13/up...axes.html?_r=0

Both tax plans are there. Take a look at the income level that the tax rate will increase. Why do you think that your taxes are going to increase? Why do you think services provided to seniors will be reduced? If I missing something point it out?

Tax dollars are fungible, there are no separate drawers. You don't get to say how your tax dollars are spent. It all goes into one big pot. To say the rich will pay and you won't is a big corrupt gimmick designed to fool the low information democrat voters. It seems to be working from your responses. Wupith the Fed at clise to zero interest rates, the onky tool left is fiscal policy and if we are going to use our tax dollars for "free" stuff and forgive student loans our economy will not be able to take it. So go ahead and vote for Hillary.

Originally Posted by Guest

You are missing the whole point. Most of us worked a lifetime to provide for our families, NOT for somebody else's. THEY should provide for themselves. If they need something basic to survive--food, shelter, medicine--I'm happy to help. But large screen TVs, cell phones, filet mignon, pick up trucks and college are NOT necessities to survive. What is necessary is for them to get off their butts and WORK for what they want.

Hillary's tax is just more of the same almost a carbon copy of Obamas which produced practically no growth in the economy. iin order to get this economy rolling again we need at least 4% growth which will double Waziers every 14 years. Corporate taxes will be cut to allow us to compete with the tax rates offered by European and Asian companies. The best part of his plan is to repatriate up to a trillion dollars held overseas accounts and bring it back to United States requiring at least 10% of that money to be used to expand plants,factories and equipment to create jobs. This is a Huge incentive. Hillary's plan for corporation she is largely punitive and will not create any jobs or any growth.

Originally Posted by Guest

Hillary's tax is just more of the same almost a carbon copy of Obamas which produced practically no growth in the economy. iin order to get this economy rolling again we need at least 4% growth which will double Wages every 14 years. Corporate taxes will be cut to allow us to compete with the tax rates offered by European and Asian companies. The best part of his plan is to repatriate up to a trillion dollars held overseas accounts and bring it back to United States requiring at least 10% of that money to be used to expand plants,factories and equipment to create jobs. This is a Huge incentive. Hillary's plan for corporation she is largely punitive and will not create any jobs or any growth.

Corrected copy