Originally Posted by Guest

He's not a bigot, he's a full blown racist piece of garbage.


I wonder what he/she thinks they did to deserve the luck of having been born with white skin?

Luck of the draw I guess. Could have been born a dog or cat too, maybe a zebra or a bird.

Originally Posted by Guest

I was wrongly taught that we were all the same.

Yes...you were wrongly taught everyone is the same. Haven't opened your eyes and looked around at reality yet? Nothing in the real world shows us anywhere near being the same.

Originally Posted by Guest

Absolutely.

The only good news is that I have read a lot of data that shows young people are less and less likely to hold these disgusting, putrid and hateful views.

Yes, and they are probably all gay too. It's a new fad where they are being taught that gay is the new "normal." Hello ROME, goodbye America.

[QUOTE=Guest;1217115]

Originally Posted by Guest

I cannot believe that people like you exist in 2016.

What? People that might consider Booker T Washington to be a good candidate for representing Black America on money? Why, because BOTH sides might agree with his being representative on currency? Or, is it disgusting that his name is suggested, only because he was a Republican?

I cannot believe that people like you exist in 2016

Originally Posted by Guest

Yes, and they are probably all gay too. It's a new fad where they are being taught that gay is the new "normal." Hello ROME, goodbye America.

Being gay is not the norm, nor is it a choice.

At what age did you decide you were attracted to the opposite sex and not the same sex?

The same answer applies to almost all gays, they didn't make the choice.

Originally Posted by Guest

Yes, and they are probably all gay too. It's a new fad where they are being taught that gay is the new "normal." Hello ROME, goodbye America.

Yes, they ARE being taught "gay" is normal. It was for political reasons, taken out of the DSM, "the book of disorders".

You know what other thing is disturbing? Blacks "shaming" white girls into having sex with them. Yup, if they don't, they start yelling and heckling them saying they're racist. Ask any high school girl. Ask your grand daughters. They "beat" them into submission by "humiliating" them. It's the quiet, shy, self conscience, withdrawn ones who fall victim the easiest.

All this "diversity" is destroying us socially and morally.

Originally Posted by Guest

Being gay is not the norm, nor is it a choice.

At what age did you decide you were attracted to the opposite sex and not the same sex?

The same answer applies to almost all gays, they didn't make the choice.

"Being gay" is not a choice. It's an unfortunate birth defect. So is being born a psychopath, but we don't condone that.

Engaging in gay behavior is a choice. Young boys are being taught that gay is good. There is nothing wrong about two men "being together" sexually. Being full of hormones and horny as hell, they are engaging in homosexual activities. They're more bi-sexual than gay. They'd rather have a girl, but drunk with the boys... The number of bi-sexual men/boys is rising. https://www.google.com/search?q=numb...utf-8&oe=utf-8

There you have it...part of the negatives of a liberal society.

Next it will be incest. Why not? Why leave home without it? Who's gonna treat you better than family...right? Science knows that it takes generations of incest before most of the really bad genetic inbreeding stuff starts to come out. (End sarcasm for those who didn't know)

We're becoming a nation of 3rd world, perverted, idiots.

Originally Posted by Guest

Being gay is not the norm, nor is it a choice.

At what age did you decide you were attracted to the opposite sex and not the same sex?

The same answer applies to almost all gays, they didn't make the choice.

So, you are saying that gays are mentally retarded? Are you saying that gays do not understand normal from abnormal? If they are adult and gay, do they not have a choice? Are they unable to make a choice based on normal and abnormal? Just wondering, since I am not an EXPERT. Perhaps, since you indicate that attraction to a gender is not automatic when born, that maybe it is a LEARNED attraction? I wonder when bestiality will become the fad norm. It's been allowed in Denmark for a long time. Isn't that the country that liberals proudly use as an example of a successful socialist system? Do you think that those practicing bestiality were born with that attraction or do you think it was a LEARNED attraction? Just wondering. I'm not an expert on human nature. Should we give those type of choices a special benefit and special rights also? When do you suppose that pedophiles will come forward with their demand for special consideration? Oh, so many questions and nobody has the answers.

The country is burning while Obie plays the fiddle thinking only of climate control.

More like when one cannot find or attract the normal opposite sex they turn to the next opportunity; or onto the next; and the next; etc.....anything that works!

Just don't try to convince the moral majority what those that do this are normal; as they are not.

The intention of opposites attract was/still is to pro create. Last I was aware there was only one normal that makes that happen!

Originally Posted by Guest

More like when one cannot find or attract the normal opposite sex they turn to the next opportunity; or onto the next; and the next; etc.....anything that works!

Just don't try to convince the moral majority what those that do this are normal; as they are not.

The intention of opposites attract was/still is to pro create. Last I was aware there was only one normal that makes that happen!

But, they insist that animals do it also. That makes them seem so right, when they compare themselves with abnormal animals. The liberal mind is so superior...

Originally Posted by Guest

But, they insist that animals do it also. That makes them seem so right, when they compare themselves with abnormal animals. The liberal mind is so superior...

"There's gay dogs...so we should be able to be gay too"!

Are you talking jive?

Dat dog be gay n!@@.. so wez shud too n!@@.. Word

Originally Posted by Guest

Dat dog be gay n!@@.. so wez shud too n!@@.. Word

This is an example of your reality. It's about 80 years behind the times when jive was even talked about. How sad.

Originally Posted by Guest

So, you are saying that gays are mentally retarded? Are you saying that gays do not understand normal from abnormal? If they are adult and gay, do they not have a choice? Are they unable to make a choice based on normal and abnormal? Just wondering, since I am not an EXPERT. Perhaps, since you indicate that attraction to a gender is not automatic when born, that maybe it is a LEARNED attraction? I wonder when bestiality will become the fad norm. It's been allowed in Denmark for a long time. Isn't that the country that liberals proudly use as an example of a successful socialist system? Do you think that those practicing bestiality were born with that attraction or do you think it was a LEARNED attraction? Just wondering. I'm not an expert on human nature. Should we give those type of choices a special benefit and special rights also? When do you suppose that pedophiles will come forward with their demand for special consideration? Oh, so many questions and nobody has the answers.

The country is burning while Obie plays the fiddle thinking only of climate control.

You really should work on your woefully inadequate ability to comprehend written words.

I never said anything about 'mental retardation,' because if I had an argument could be put forth using your own words as proof of it.

I asked you "at what age did you decide you were attracted to the opposite sex and not the same sex" and you have purposely refused to answer a simple question.

The reason of course, to anyone with a bit of intelligence, is that you didn't make that choice...it was made for you.

While someone may feel 'icky' about same sex attraction of two consenting adults, that doesn't automatically mean it should be illegal. Heck, I personally think tattoos and drunken seniors are icky, but I'm not running around trying to get them outlawed if they really don't affect me (drunk driving being an obvious exception).

In other words, you don't have the right to force your feeling of repulsion on others, if it is between two consenting adults and doesn't affect you.

Why in the world would you think your right to not being uncomfortable, trumps other people's right to do things that really doesn't affect you and is between consenting adults?

Originally Posted by Guest

You really should work on your woefully inadequate ability to comprehend written words.

I never said anything about 'mental retardation,' because if I had an argument could be put forth using your own words as proof of it.

I asked you "at what age did you decide you were attracted to the opposite sex and not the same sex" and you have purposely refused to answer a simple question.

The reason of course, to anyone with a bit of intelligence, is that you didn't make that choice...it was made for you.

While someone may feel 'icky' about same sex attraction of two consenting adults, that doesn't automatically mean it should be illegal. Heck, I personally think tattoos and drunken seniors are icky, but I'm not running around trying to get them outlawed if they really don't affect me (drunk driving being an obvious exception).

In other words, you don't have the right to force your feeling of repulsion on others, if it is between two consenting adults and doesn't affect you.

Why in the world would you think your right to not being uncomfortable, trumps other people's right to do things that really doesn't affect you and is between consenting adults?

Where did all that come from? Did you come up with that from the post that you replied to? How long did it take for you to write that? Sounds like a lot of thought went into it, even if it doesn't make any sense.

Originally Posted by Guest

Where did all that come from? Did you come up with that from the post that you replied to? How long did it take for you to write that?

1. Go back and read the post I quoted.

2. See #1.

3. Probably about 30 seconds.

Sounds like a lot of thought went into it, even if it doesn't make any sense.

You really should work on your woefully inadequate ability to comprehend written words.

I never said anything about 'mental retardation,' because if I had, an argument could be put forth using your own words as proof of it.

Thank you for proving my point.