Originally Posted by Guest

Planned Parenthood is not dissecting "fetus..the size of a grain of rice." They are parting out pieces of babies, or they wouldn't be cutting them up. But, this is not about the definition of baby versus fetus. It is the result of someone stupidly comparing the forfeited life of a criminal versus the innocent life stolen from an unborn child. This poster then tried to rationalize saving the rapist/murderer by submitting the sanctity of life argument, and yet discard the life of an unborn child as that of human waste or excrement.

Over 90% of abortions are due to convenience, not necessity. Less than 1% due to rape or incest. On top of that, there were more black babies aborted last year than were born. If liberals cared so much about the minority, then why are they so determined to fund genocide? If Black Lives Matter, then why are they not protesting outside of PP?

The poster never said anything about saving the rapist/murderer. My opinion is - if all the evidence is 100% that a person did a horrible crime, they deserve to be punished according to the law. And also, according to the law, if a woman chooses to have an abortion, she is entitled to one.

A big problem in this country, is that these babies are being born, and no one wants them or can provide a decent upbringing for them. They are brought into the world with many strikes against them, and it fuels the cycle of crime and poverty. I see all these people protesting abortion, but where are they when the babies are born addicted to crack, or with mental or physical disabilities, are sexually abused, or are of minority or mixed race heritage, or a result of rape or incest, and their chances of being adopted are very small? At any given time there are hundreds of thousands of these kids in the foster care system, where many of them suffer neglect, and they just don't have a chance.

Another thing that is happening is that thanks to medical advances, these fetuses can be made viable, which leads to babies being born with severe physical and mental problems, babies in the past that would have died. These are a tremendous hardship on the families, or in many cases the state or social services, where the babies end up being placed. Society ends up paying for these children who live in a vegetative state. These kids should never have been brought into the world in the first place.

And lastly, outlawing abortion would not stop abortions anymore than prohibition stopped people from drinking alcohol. The abortions would end up being done in back alleys, with coat hangers, and women would be likely to die during the process. And, for some women, continuing on with the pregnancy would endanger their health. Forced birthing is a crime against women.

Originally Posted by Guest

And I suppose all you pro death penalty people are against abortion, and don't see the contradiction.

And you cannot see the difference....obviously by the snide inference that is about as relevant as from shinola!!!!

Originally Posted by Guest

The poster never said anything about saving the rapist/murderer. My opinion is - if all the evidence is 100% that a person did a horrible crime, they deserve to be punished according to the law. And also, according to the law, if a woman chooses to have an abortion, she is entitled to one.

A big problem in this country, is that these babies are being born, and no one wants them or can provide a decent upbringing for them. They are brought into the world with many strikes against them, and it fuels the cycle of crime and poverty. I see all these people protesting abortion, but where are they when the babies are born addicted to crack, or with mental or physical disabilities, are sexually abused, or are of minority or mixed race heritage, or a result of rape or incest, and their chances of being adopted are very small? At any given time there are hundreds of thousands of these kids in the foster care system, where many of them suffer neglect, and they just don't have a chance.

Another thing that is happening is that thanks to medical advances, these fetuses can be made viable, which leads to babies being born with severe physical and mental problems, babies in the past that would have died. These are a tremendous hardship on the families, or in many cases the state or social services, where the babies end up being placed. Society ends up paying for these children who live in a vegetative state. These kids should never have been brought into the world in the first place.

And lastly, outlawing abortion would not stop abortions anymore than prohibition stopped people from drinking alcohol. The abortions would end up being done in back alleys, with coat hangers, and women would be likely to die during the process. And, for some women, continuing on with the pregnancy would endanger their health. Forced birthing is a crime against women.

Well said.

Originally Posted by Guest

The poster never said anything about saving the rapist/murderer. My opinion is - if all the evidence is 100% that a person did a horrible crime, they deserve to be punished according to the law. And also, according to the law, if a woman chooses to have an abortion, she is entitled to one.

A big problem in this country, is that these babies are being born, and no one wants them or can provide a decent upbringing for them. They are brought into the world with many strikes against them, and it fuels the cycle of crime and poverty. I see all these people protesting abortion, but where are they when the babies are born addicted to crack, or with mental or physical disabilities, are sexually abused, or are of minority or mixed race heritage, or a result of rape or incest, and their chances of being adopted are very small? At any given time there are hundreds of thousands of these kids in the foster care system, where many of them suffer neglect, and they just don't have a chance.

Another thing that is happening is that thanks to medical advances, these fetuses can be made viable, which leads to babies being born with severe physical and mental problems, babies in the past that would have died. These are a tremendous hardship on the families, or in many cases the state or social services, where the babies end up being placed. Society ends up paying for these children who live in a vegetative state. These kids should never have been brought into the world in the first place.

And lastly, outlawing abortion would not stop abortions anymore than prohibition stopped people from drinking alcohol. The abortions would end up being done in back alleys, with coat hangers, and women would be likely to die during the process. And, for some women, continuing on with the pregnancy would endanger their health. Forced birthing is a crime against women.

Obviously, you have rationalized your guilt away. I'll bet you feel that marijuana should be legalized also because everyone is going to do it anyway. Of course, speed limits are stupid because everyone is going to speed anyway. We don't need no stinkin' laws.
You have definitely gone all the way down the tube when it comes to rationalizing abortions by justifying it because we can do it safely and cleanly. The cherry on the top is when you say "these kids should never have been brought into the world in the first place. " So, if I think you are a valuable asset to the community, it will be ok to do a post-natal abortion upon you? Who are you to decide who is worthy of life? Are you kidding? You have not justified murder of children regardless of your rationalizing it.
"Forced birthing is a crime against women"??? Only because liberals have made abortion/ murdering babies legal. But, no matter how "legal" you make it, you will have to someday answer to the sin part of it. Because making a sin legal doesn't take away the definition of sin.
Good luck on your worthless life. Hope someone doesn't think of you as you think of unborn babies.
Don't worry, I am not going to argue abortion with you anymore. If you are as smart as you think you are, you already know that you took the wrong side of that debate.