Is it time to begin referring to ms. Clinton as " The Presumptive President Elect " ? Is it time to begin referring to ms. Clinton as " The Presumptive President Elect " ? - Page 2 - Talk of The Villages Florida

Is it time to begin referring to ms. Clinton as " The Presumptive President Elect " ?

 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 06-10-2016, 10:30 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
you gave it away by doing nothing.
What is your plan?
  #17  
Old 06-10-2016, 10:52 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
And while the downward spiral of America continues to pick up speed : " ATLAS SHRUGGED " !


Note : The book by the above title is lengthy and dense and was written many decades ago . However it tells a story of what happened when America finally reached " The Tipping Point ".
All of the good people who worked and contributed to the quality of life finally had enough and relocated . This left the " Takers " with no more support --- no more producers to exploit and chump off from .
In a micro way the theory of this novel is already in motion . Those still working who have high incomes and assets are already seeking to live in lower tax states . However the retired are leaving behind the over-taxed Northern states and relocating to the South taking their lifetime of assets with them . And as they do so they are leaving the over-population of " Takers " behind .
Yup...Atlas...white productive people...Shrugged...saying "why the hell am I supporting all these people"...and walked away.

I fear for our grandchildren left with this mess.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
What is your plan?
Convince as many as possible that diversity is destroying us and we need to work together to stop it.

Making it acceptable for white people to care about white people and our future.

For 50 years it's ALL been about them, how to make THEIR life better and we've been sidelined. Well, it's time to give up the equality insanity and move on. Let the chips lay where they fall.
  #18  
Old 06-10-2016, 10:56 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
I guess no one is interested in chatting with you. So, keep replying to yourself or adding more bait to your trolling. Just wanted you to know that your posts are on here, but nobody wishes to reply to your immature little comments. Perhaps if you went back to your little high school blogs, someone would cheer you on and make you feel like a grown up.
I think someone repied to hom. LOL
  #19  
Old 06-10-2016, 11:35 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Yup...AtlasConvince as many as possible that diversity is destroying us and we need to work together to stop it.
Diversity is not killing us.

What is your plan to stop it?
  #20  
Old 06-10-2016, 12:09 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
What is so objectionable to you about referring to the person you apparently support as the " Presumptive President Elect ".

The betting houses are giving her over a 70% chance of being elected . This would indicate that her election is a sure bet .

So again when someone is conceding the election to your candidate why must you take another swipe at the candidate and his family who are set to lose big-time ?


Trump has no election organization, his campaign is broke, he will not spend his own money, the big donors are walking away quickly, he couldn't stand being beaten by a woman - just some of the many reasons that Trump will soon take his marbles and go home. Being an old, fat man, he can come up with all kinds of medical reasons to quit
  #21  
Old 06-10-2016, 12:17 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Diversity is not killing us.

What is your plan to stop it?
I'm answering my own post. I don't want anything to do with you or your plans.
  #22  
Old 06-10-2016, 12:31 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Diversity is not killing us.

What is your plan to stop it?
Yes it is. EVERY place on this planet that attains a critical percentage or comes under the control of blacks/hispanics fails.

It happened in S Africa and other African countries. Former colonies that prospered for centuries, when reverting to "native" control, fails. Haiti, Jamaica, they fail.

In EVERY neighborhood that has gone from 99% whatever...to 99% black has failed. Cities with a critical mass of blacks fail. And as I said, countries with too many blacks/hispanics, fail. The entire continent of Africa has been a failure since the colonization stopped.

They've had 50 years there too...why is it worse than ever? I say they're not capable. And I think there's enough evidence to prove my point.

I was taught we're all equal too, just like everyone else. Real life taught me it's not true.
  #23  
Old 06-10-2016, 12:35 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Trump has no election organization, his campaign is broke, he will not spend his own money, the big donors are walking away quickly, he couldn't stand being beaten by a woman - just some of the many reasons that Trump will soon take his marbles and go home. Being an old, fat man, he can come up with all kinds of medical reasons to quit
And yet, Trump slew 16 giants handily. And Hillary just barely made it past an old washed up perverted socialist, at the finish line. Are you sure that you want to bet on her?

What were the odds against Trump winning the nomination?
  #24  
Old 06-10-2016, 12:55 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
And yet, Trump slew 16 giants handily. And Hillary just barely made it past an old washed up perverted socialist, at the finish line. Are you sure that you want to bet on her?

What were the odds against Trump winning the nomination?
It depends, is he really a rogue or is it an act? He won't get elected without the R party approval.
  #25  
Old 06-10-2016, 02:52 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
It depends, is he really a rogue or is it an act? He won't get elected without the R party approval.
He got the nomination without their approval, unless they stab him in the back at the convention. If they do, then Clinton will be given the election.

If my republican party doesn't get with it, they are going to lose a lot more registered to the Independents.
  #26  
Old 06-10-2016, 03:08 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The Regressives would have stood a fair chance at getting the White House back IF they had run John Kasich as their candidate instead of Trump.

Their field of candidates was pitiful. Trump, Huckabee, Walker, Fiorina, Carson, Rubio, and Cruz.

IF the heirarchy of the party could have seen the disaster that Trump is, and offered him some concession to drop out, the Regressives would have been better off.

They need a moderate such as Kasich who has Washington skills - but instead they have a losing candidate - TRUMP.
  #27  
Old 06-10-2016, 03:32 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
The Regressives would have stood a fair chance at getting the White House back IF they had run John Kasich as their candidate instead of Trump.

Their field of candidates was pitiful. Trump, Huckabee, Walker, Fiorina, Carson, Rubio, and Cruz.

IF the heirarchy of the party could have seen the disaster that Trump is, and offered him some concession to drop out, the Regressives would have been better off.

They need a moderate such as Kasich who has Washington skills - but instead they have a losing candidate - TRUMP.
You should learn the meaning of your vocabulary before parroting someone else's words. Regressive is more in line with your antiquated socialism. And everyone knows that Democrats are today's socialists. So, you are only making a fool of yourself by calling conservatives "regressives."

You think that the GOP had "pitiful" candidates? Are you a fool or what? Hillary is a criminal, liar, disloyal, tax cheat that has failed at every job she has ever had. Bernie is an ancient washed up old perverted socialist. And you think we had bad choices? What does that say for you when the best the Democrats have to offer is two nasty old people, a criminal and a commie?

You would be funny if not so pathetic. You should seek professional help. Somebody that will help you accept reality. Sure, Clinton could win. After all, they elected Obama a second time after all his failures. I'm sure that Clinton does have a good chance. That does not make her a good person, leader or American. It just means that she has fooled enough voters, live and dead, legal and illegal to get elected. Pretty soon there will be enough takers, leaches off the gov that there will be no other party but the socialist party. What is ironic is that YOU will be paying for it, not the seniors. Seniors are hardly affected by socialism in it's infancy. It will be everyone else that will have to pay for it, or become another Greece.
  #28  
Old 06-10-2016, 03:39 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Obama: Hillary Will 'Say Anything and Change Nothing'
  #29  
Old 06-10-2016, 03:49 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Donald Trump said in a speech today that he spent 55 million dollars of his own money so far. It was reported earlier this week that his campaign has three million dollars.

In 2012, both Obama and Romney raised and spent over one billion dollars each. That's quite a difference from three million to one billion.

It has also been reported that the big donors are reluctant to contribute to Trump's election, and the RNC is almost broke. So where is the money coming from?

First and foremost, Trump is a businessman. It doesn't seem likely that he will continue spending his own money when everything looks hopeless.

It was also reported today that the Koch brothers will not contribute to the republican national convention, and a lot of the big donors are also backing out.

Follow the money to see how long Trump stays in the race.
  #30  
Old 06-10-2016, 04:03 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Donald Trump said in a speech today that he spent 55 million dollars of his own money so far. It was reported earlier this week that his campaign has three million dollars.

In 2012, both Obama and Romney raised and spent over one billion dollars each. That's quite a difference from three million to one billion.

It has also been reported that the big donors are reluctant to contribute to Trump's election, and the RNC is almost broke. So where is the money coming from?

First and foremost, Trump is a businessman. It doesn't seem likely that he will continue spending his own money when everything looks hopeless.

It was also reported today that the Koch brothers will not contribute to the republican national convention, and a lot of the big donors are also backing out.

Follow the money to see how long Trump stays in the race.
Why does he need to spend money? EVERYBODY knows him. Any time he speaks the news covers it. Why does he need money?

Just think of the money involved when the presidency costs $1 billion.
 

Tags
presumptive, elect, president, clinton, time


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56 AM.