Originally Posted by billethkid

Remember she is part of the establishment that has something to gain for things to stay as is.

All anti-establishment pigs must die. I’ll pull the trigger.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That move will cause more American deaths.

Israel Knesset, prime minister, president, et al already seated in Jerusalem . Trumps move is more symbolic.

Here is a leader with intestinal fortitude who refuses to bend his policies based on the polls or talking heads salacious, gossip. We should rejoice because he is just one of the few in Washington

The same people criticizing Trump predicting doom and gloom and spreading fanciful narratives instead of facts are the same people who laughed and said he never could get elected.

Its sad when the poster child for your party (progressive) is someone like Joy Behar

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

That move will cause more American deaths.

It has fanned many extremists hatred of the west.

Originally Posted by Guest

Israel Knesset, prime minister, president, et al already seated in Jerusalem . Trumps move is more symbolic.

Here is a leader with intestinal fortitude who refuses to bend his policies based on the polls or talking heads salacious, gossip. We should rejoice because he is just one of the few in Washington

The same people criticizing Trump predicting doom and gloom and spreading fanciful narratives instead of facts are the same people who laughed and said he never could get elected.

Its sad when the poster child for your party (progressive) is someone like Joy Behar

Personal Best Regards:

He lost the popular vote and would have lost the Electoral one too except for James Comey' s ill time announcement about Anthony Weiner's e-mails. And he had an incredible amount of help from his friends in Russia.

Originally Posted by Guest

It has fanned many extremists hatred of the west.

Doesn't everything and anything.
Can one tell any difference over the past 50 years?
NO!

Originally Posted by Guest

He lost the popular vote and would have lost the Electoral one too except for James Comey' s ill time announcement about Anthony Weiner's e-mails. And he had an incredible amount of help from his friends in Russia.

Obvious someone has the party talking points down pat!!
Should be. They have been served up as a daily diet of the same old same old well worn, meaningless rhetoric.

The democrats lost.

As measured by the method dictated by the law of our land...like it or not.

This was actually voted on by Congress back in the nineties and was ignored by the three previous presidents. It's about time that we have someone that understands the separation of powers and the system of checks and balances.

Originally Posted by Dr Winston O Boogie jr

This was actually voted on by Congress back in the nineties and was ignored by the three previous presidents. It's about time that we have someone that understands the separation of powers and the system of checks and balances.

Do you mean the same way Trump is ignoring enforcing the new Russian sanctions ? Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Guest

Israel Knesset, prime minister, president, et al already seated in Jerusalem . Trumps move is more symbolic.

Here is a leader with intestinal fortitude who refuses to bend his policies based on the polls or talking heads salacious, gossip. We should rejoice because he is just one of the few in Washington

The same people criticizing Trump predicting doom and gloom and spreading fanciful narratives instead of facts are the same people who laughed and said he never could get elected.

Its sad when the poster child for your party (progressive) is someone like Joy Behar

Personal Best Regards:

Explaining to Trump the importance of maintaining a delicate security balance, honored by both American parties and U.S. allies, doesn’t work – because he’s the kid who enjoys tearing down the tower of blocks, not the one who likes to build it.

This was true with the Paris climate accord, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, his Muslim ban, and now with his policy toward Israel.

Predictably, most of the world responded with disgust yesterday, with officials from allied countries using words like “dangerous” and “catastrophic.” The United Nations secretary general spoke of his “great anxiety,” while the European Union expressed “serious concern.”

Because in the end, the president cared less about pursuing a sensible policy and more about saying “I am delivering” for the cameras.

Originally Posted by mellincf

Explaining to Trump the importance of maintaining a delicate security balance, honored by both American parties and U.S. allies, doesn’t work – because he’s the kid who enjoys tearing down the tower of blocks, not the one who likes to build it.

This was true with the Paris climate accord, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, his Muslim ban, and now with his policy toward Israel.

Predictably, most of the world responded with disgust yesterday, with officials from allied countries using words like “dangerous” and “catastrophic.” The United Nations secretary general spoke of his “great anxiety,” while the European Union expressed “serious concern.”

Because in the end, the president cared less about pursuing a sensible policy and more about saying “I am delivering” for the cameras.

The ultimate narcissist.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Guest

Explaining to Trump the importance of maintaining a delicate security balance, honored by both American parties and U.S. allies, doesn’t work – because he’s the kid who enjoys tearing down the tower of blocks, not the one who likes to build it.

This was true with the Paris climate accord, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, his Muslim ban, and now with his policy toward Israel.

Predictably, most of the world responded with disgust yesterday, with officials from allied countries using words like “dangerous” and “catastrophic.” The United Nations secretary general spoke of his “great anxiety,” while the European Union expressed “serious concern.”

Because in the end, the president cared less about pursuing a sensible policy and more about saying “I am delivering” for the cameras.

Originally Posted by Guest

The ultimate narcissist.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Instead of b!tching about HIM because you don't like alpha males...how about telling us EXACTLY what YOU don't like about these policy changes. What BAD happens because of his changes?

Originally Posted by Guest

Explaining to Trump the importance of maintaining a delicate security balance, honored by both American parties and U.S. allies, doesn’t work – because he’s the kid who enjoys tearing down the tower of blocks, not the one who likes to build it.

This was true with the Paris climate accord, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, his Muslim ban, and now with his policy toward Israel.

Predictably, most of the world responded with disgust yesterday, with officials from allied countries using words like “dangerous” and “catastrophic.” The United Nations secretary general spoke of his “great anxiety,” while the European Union expressed “serious concern.”

Because in the end, the president cared less about pursuing a sensible policy and more about saying “I am delivering” for the cameras.

An excellent presentation of what the media, the democrats, all the establishment national and international want you to know.

Climate accord. Did you read the details of the billions that the USA pays into that organization....much of which gets divided among the other members. And did you take note of what the USA gets from it?
Also that the majority of the $$ paid go to nothing having to do with the climate.

So why did this action and story dry up and lose media attention? Because of the above.

A no nonsense, non politician goes in and sees a bad deal for the USA and calls it quits.
All that gets reported is the roar of the establishment...none of the details of why it was/is a bad deal.

Same BS on the move of the embassy to Jerusalem.
A no nonsense, non politician agrees what past presidents were proposing and why. And instead of bowing before the permissive crowd and rolling over to those who have something to lose....he does what those before him advocated.

What he has going against him?
Clinton lost the sure thing election and the party is still flailing about....and are vehement anti-Trump anything.
The establishment both R&D and internationally that are totally against any change that brings threat to their current holdings/rewards/kingdoms.
The amplifier of all that is good (anti Trump) and all that is bad (anything that Trump does).

Is he right or wrong?
How would we ever know.
The establishment and the media are dedicated to assure we never know.



None untypical reactions to a change agent.

Originally Posted by Guest

Explaining to Trump the importance of maintaining a delicate security balance, honored by both American parties and U.S. allies, doesn’t work – because he’s the kid who enjoys tearing down the tower of blocks, not the one who likes to build it.

This was true with the Paris climate accord, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, his Muslim ban, and now with his policy toward Israel.

Predictably, most of the world responded with disgust yesterday, with officials from allied countries using words like “dangerous” and “catastrophic.” The United Nations secretary general spoke of his “great anxiety,” while the European Union expressed “serious concern.”

Because in the end, the president cared less about pursuing a sensible policy and more about saying “I am delivering” for the cameras.

Sad but true. He is a real amateur as far as politics are concerned. Making the world far worse than when it was when he was elected by a minus 2.7 million votes against him.

Originally Posted by Guest

Sad but true. He is a real amateur as far as politics are concerned. Making the world far worse than when it was when he was elected by a minus 2.7 votes against him.

Please give examples on how the WORLD is far worse since he was elected.