Originally Posted by Guest

People should read it before making over generalizations about it. It looks like a lame attempt at satire which backfired on a very young Bernie Sanders.

Essay It Ain't So! : snopes.com Link to Snopes.com coverage of this one page essay.

Originally Posted by Guest

People should read it before making over generalizations about it. It looks like a lame attempt at satire which backfired on a very young Bernie Sanders.

OK, so now we know that liberals have no problem with a president writing porno. Exactly how far will the Democrats scrape the bottom of the barrel before they give up in frustration?

Abortion as contraception
Contraception subsidized by gov.
No guns
Freedom FROM religion; no Christmas decorations on public property
No gender
Sodomy is OK and should be endorsed by the church
First Amendment is wrong except when it comes to PC
National Security is not important
Loyalty to police and military is not important
Tobacco illegal, Marijuana should be legal
Immigration laws are not important
Voter ID disenfranchises (those that should not be voting anyway)
No death penalty for criminals but death penalty for babies is ok

Never mind, it's useless. When there is a lack of morality and ethics, you can bet that that is where you will find a liberal.

Originally Posted by Guest

He's your candidate and you don't even know this? Pathetic.

I asked where YOU read it. I can help you if you want.

Originally Posted by Guest

OK, so now we know that liberals have no problem with a president writing porno. Exactly how far will the Democrats scrape the bottom of the barrel before they give up in frustration?

Abortion as contraception
Contraception subsidized by gov.
No guns
Freedom FROM religion; no Christmas decorations on public property
No gender
Sodomy is OK and should be endorsed by the church
First Amendment is wrong except when it comes to PC
National Security is not important
Loyalty to police and military is not important
Tobacco illegal, Marijuana should be legal
Immigration laws are not important
Voter ID disenfranchises (those that should not be voting anyway)
No death penalty for criminals but death penalty for babies is ok

Never mind, it's useless. When there is a lack of morality and ethics, you can bet that that is where you will find a liberal.

Can you back any of that with a source? I enjoy reading opposing viewpoints.

Originally Posted by Guest

OK, so now we know that liberals have no problem with a president writing porno. Exactly how far will the Democrats scrape the bottom of the barrel before they give up in frustration?

Abortion as contraception
Contraception subsidized by gov.
No guns
Freedom FROM religion; no Christmas decorations on public property
No gender
Sodomy is OK and should be endorsed by the church
First Amendment is wrong except when it comes to PC
National Security is not important
Loyalty to police and military is not important
Tobacco illegal, Marijuana should be legal
Immigration laws are not important
Voter ID disenfranchises (those that should not be voting anyway)
No death penalty for criminals but death penalty for babies is ok

Never mind, it's useless. When there is a lack of morality and ethics, you can bet that that is where you will find a liberal.

Porno writer, I. Lewis (Scooter) Libby, cheney stooge, I guess you were okay with him or did you conveniently forget him? But wait, he was a repub, so that is okay.

Originally Posted by Guest

Porno writer, I. Lewis (Scooter) Libby, cheney stooge, I guess you were okay with him or did you conveniently forget him? But wait, he was a repub, so that is okay.

Nice try. What has this got to do with Bernie the nice guy, porno writer for president? Didn't your momma ever tell you not to jump off the bridge just because little Jimmy down the street did? You are pathetic.

Originally Posted by Guest

nice sideswipe
Tell me your source of information.

Can't you put all your one liner replies on one comment? Or, did you do this to make it look like you had another liberal supporter?

I gave you a reference. I made the statement and if you don't believe it, it is up to you. When you cried like a little girl, I even gave you a reference so it would be EASIER for you to find on the Internet. Obviously, Google is too difficult for you, or you wouldn't be stumping your feet and demanding that I spoon feed you.

So, go away little Trollie.

Originally Posted by Guest

The dumbing down continues. Do you even know what you're talking about?

Mrs Clinton will have her Party's nomination locked up by April 1.

Get a clue .....

I think you mis-typed. Didn't you mean;
Mrs Clinton will will be locked up by April 1.

Here's a Playboy interview with Trump.
https://thecorporateculture.com/2015...-25-years-ago/

I'll give you one quote: "Some of our Presidents have been incredible jerk-offs. We need to be tough."

Now if that was on a hat--I'd buy it.

Originally Posted by Guest

You are the lazy one, aren't you? I made a statement of fact. If you don't believe me, prove me wrong. But, like a petulant child, you are way too lazy to help yourself. You demand me to prove something? Go away kid.

Try "Man and Woman" by Bernie Sanders, Feb 1972. I was going to post a copy of it but it is too vulgar for this forum. I'm sure you wouldn't have a problem with it though.

National Review writer Charles C.W. Cooke, though, dismissed the essay as insignificant:

"Nobody honestly believes that Bernie Sanders is a sexual pervert or that he is a misogynist or that he intends to do women any harm. Nobody suspects that he harbors a secret desire to pass intrusive legislation or to cut gang rapists a break. Really, there is only one reason that anyone would make hay of this story, and that is to damage the man politically."

National Review (N.R.) is a semi-monthly magazine founded by author William F. Buckley, Jr. in 1955.

I forget. Was Buckley a liberal?

I really wonder how many Villagers are going to show up Sunday at the Rohan Rec Center to see "Little" Marco?

If I show up with my sign of "I Voted For Hillary", I wonder if Marco will autograph it for me?

Originally Posted by Guest

I really wonder how many Villagers are going to show up Sunday at the Rohan Rec Center to see "Little" Marco?

If I show up with my sign of "I Voted For Hillary", I wonder if Marco will autograph it for me?

Unlike Hillary responding to that one African woman that had a question, by telling her to go run for office herself, I believe that if you asked Rubio to sign it, he is nice enough of a guy that he would. If you get Trump or Hillary as president, you will probably be wishing you had voted for Rubio.

Originally Posted by Guest

National Review writer Charles C.W. Cooke, though, dismissed the essay as insignificant:

"Nobody honestly believes that Bernie Sanders is a sexual pervert or that he is a misogynist or that he intends to do women any harm. Nobody suspects that he harbors a secret desire to pass intrusive legislation or to cut gang rapists a break. Really, there is only one reason that anyone would make hay of this story, and that is to damage the man politically."

National Review (N.R.) is a semi-monthly magazine founded by author William F. Buckley, Jr. in 1955.

I forget. Was Buckley a liberal?

Sanders may not be a sexual pervert. He may just be as crazy as a bed bug. You liberals were all over allegations that Romney might have hazzed a kid by cutting his hair when he was in high school, but when a nut case writes an essay demeaning women, you think it is perfectly OK. I guess I should not be surprised coming from the party(Democrats)of slavery.

Originally Posted by Guest

I really wonder how many Villagers are going to show up Sunday at the Rohan Rec Center to see "Little" Marco?

If I show up with my sign of "I Voted For Hillary", I wonder if Marco will autograph it for me?

And, I'll stand right beside you wearing my "I'm with Stupid" T-shirt.

Originally Posted by Guest

And, I'll stand right beside you wearing my "I'm with Stupid" T-shirt.

Someone beat you to it.