Originally Posted by The Villager II

What? Are we talking about what Rush said to the young lady.

Stunner. Georgetown “Coed” Sandra Fluke Is a 30 Year-Old Women’s Rights Activist-
Jammie Wearing Fool reported:

I put that in quotes because in the beginning she was described as a Georgetown law student. It was then revealed that prior to attending Georgetown she was an active women’s right advocate. In one of her first interviews she is quoted as talking about how she reviewed Georgetown’s insurance policy prior to committing to attend, and seeing that it didn’t cover contraceptive services, she decided to attend with the express purpose of battling this policy. During this time, she was described as a 23-year-old coed. Magically, at the same time Congress is debating the forced coverage of contraception, she appears and is even brought to Capitol Hill to testify. This morning, in an interview with Matt Lauer on the Today show, it was revealed that she is 30 years old, NOT the 23 that had been reported all along.

In other words, folks, you are being played. She has been an activist all along and the Dems were just waiting for the appropriate time to play her.


Don't see Rush mentioned once in this original post of this thread....

Originally Posted by KatzPajamas

Stunner. Georgetown “Coed” Sandra Fluke Is a 30 Year-Old Women’s Rights Activist-
Jammie Wearing Fool reported:

I put that in quotes because in the beginning she was described as a Georgetown law student. It was then revealed that prior to attending Georgetown she was an active women’s right advocate. In one of her first interviews she is quoted as talking about how she reviewed Georgetown’s insurance policy prior to committing to attend, and seeing that it didn’t cover contraceptive services, she decided to attend with the express purpose of battling this policy. During this time, she was described as a 23-year-old coed. Magically, at the same time Congress is debating the forced coverage of contraception, she appears and is even brought to Capitol Hill to testify. This morning, in an interview with Matt Lauer on the Today show, it was revealed that she is 30 years old, NOT the 23 that had been reported all along.

In other words, folks, you are being played. She has been an activist all along and the Dems were just waiting for the appropriate time to play her.


Don't see Rush mentioned once in this original post of this thread....

Ya have to give respect for the lady to fight for womens rights like she does. Who if not her to protect women from the discriminating rules of the chruch.

Originally Posted by The Villager II

Ya have to give respect for the lady to fight for womens rights like she does. Who if not her to protect women from the discriminating rules of the chruch.

Why doesn't she just haul her buns to WalMart and buy her pills? Doesn't anybody budget for anything anymore? Oh right, no WalMart in Georgetown.

What abolute proof do we have that the link in the first post was truthful? The link that was provided was from some reactionary right wing organization and I would have doubt as to the credibility of the article.

Even IF it is truthful, does that give Limbaugh the right to say things like the young lady should post videos of her having sex on the Internet?

Until I see absolute proof that the linked article was truthful, I will continue to doubt it.

Originally Posted by buggyone

What abolute proof do we have that the link in the first post was truthful? The link that was provided was from some reactionary right wing organization and I would have doubt as to the credibility of the article.

Even IF it is truthful, does that give Limbaugh the right to say things like the young lady should post videos of her having sex on the Internet?

Until I see absolute proof that the linked article was truthful, I will continue to doubt it.

He sounded way too perverted for my taste.

Originally Posted by Posh 08

Why doesn't she just haul her buns to WalMart and buy her pills? Doesn't anybody budget for anything anymore? Oh right, no WalMart in Georgetown.

I think she may be fighting for all women that not all can fight for their rights nor afford to go to Wal-Mart.

Originally Posted by The Villager II

I think she may be fighting for all women that not all can fight for their rights nor afford to go to Wal-Mart.

Somebody already did that as evidenced by the availability of birth control on the state level for those that can't afford WalMart.
Example:

Medical Services

Nobody would have ever heard of Sandra Fluke if Rush Limbaugh hadn't called her every name in the book and said he wanted to watch her having sex on the internet. By the time people go to the polls in November, they won't remember Sandra Fluke, but they will remember Rush Limbaugh's inflammatory comments.

Originally Posted by janmcn

Nobody would have ever heard of Sandra Fluke if Rush Limbaugh hadn't called her every name in the book and said he wanted to watch her having sex on the internet. By the time people go to the polls in November, they won't remember Sandra Fluke, but they will remember Rush Limbaugh's inflammatory comments.

And who Rush supports to make his weird rules come to law.

Originally Posted by janmcn

Nobody would have ever heard of Sandra Fluke if Rush Limbaugh hadn't called her every name in the book and said he wanted to watch her having sex on the internet. By the time people go to the polls in November, they won't remember Sandra Fluke, but they will remember Rush Limbaugh's inflammatory comments.

Is Limbaugh on the Republican ticket now?

Originally Posted by schotzyb

Is Limbaugh on the Republican ticket now?

OMG, I hope not, but some republican will be and women will remember the republicans war on women.

Its one thing to present yourself as the everyday law student sharing a personal opinion on financial affect vis a vis a female activist intentionally pushing a political agenda. To dismiss this comparison out of hand is... well as liberals are fond of repeating "disingenious".

As I referenced in another thread I'm told that Walmart offers a 30 day supply of generic birth control for $4. If this is the case then perhaps someone might inform Nancy Pelosi and Sandra Fluke. But even if it is not taxpayers ought not to be on he hook.

Originally Posted by rubicon

Its one thing to present yourself as the everyday law student sharing a personal opinion on financial affect vis a vis a female activist intentionally pushing a political agenda. To dismiss this comparison out of hand is... well as liberals are fond of repeating "disingenious".

As I referenced in another thread I'm told that Walmart offers a 30 day supply of generic birth control for $4. If this is the case then perhaps someone might inform Nancy Pelosi and Sandra Fluke. But even if it is not taxpayers ought not to be on he hook.

Indeed!

This is non-issue come November.........Sarah who?

Originally Posted by janmcn

OMG, I hope not, but some republican will be and women will remember the republicans war on women.

and cardinal dolan [and others] will make sure voters remember the democrats attack on the catholic church.