WikiLeaks Founder: Here's The Evidence That Hillary Clinton Knew 'C' Stands For ‘Classified'


}
60 days | 9 hours | 28 minutes | 10 seconds

Home Articles Election WikiLeaks Founder: Here's The Evidence That Hillary Clinton Knew...

WikiLeaks Founder: Here's The Evidence That Hillary Clinton Knew 'C' Stands For 'Classified'

Jullian Assange, the fugitive founder of Wikileaks, claims his organization has released thousands of documents that prove the Hillary Clinton lied to the Federal Bureau of Investigations when she told them that she didn't recognize classification markings in emails she received during her time as Secretary of State.

According to recently released FBI notes on their investigation into her use of a private email server, Clinton made the somewhat brazen claim during her three hour interview with investigators.

"When asked what the parenthetical ‘C’ meant before a paragraph within the captioned email, [Clinton] stated she did not know and could only speculate it was referencing paragraphs marked in alphabetical order," read the FBI’s notes from their interview.

On Tuesday's Hannity, Julian Assange revealed that Clinton's claim of ignorance is contradicted by evidence that has already been released by WikiLeaks.

"Hillary Clinton says she can't remember what a 'C' in brackets stands for, everyone in positions of government and at WikiLeaks knows it stands for 'classified confidential'," Assange told Sean.

"In fact, we have already released thousands of cables by Hillary Clinton...thousands of examples where she herself has used the 'C' in brackets and signed it off," Assange said, holding up an example of such a cable and indicating Clinton's signature. In addition, Assange said that Clinton received more than 22 thousand cables from others in which the 'C' in brackets appears.

Originally Posted by Guest

WikiLeaks Founder: Here's The Evidence That Hillary Clinton Knew 'C' Stands For ‘Classified'


}
60 days | 9 hours | 28 minutes | 10 seconds

Home Articles Election WikiLeaks Founder: Here's The Evidence That Hillary Clinton Knew...

WikiLeaks Founder: Here's The Evidence That Hillary Clinton Knew 'C' Stands For 'Classified'

Jullian Assange, the fugitive founder of Wikileaks, claims his organization has released thousands of documents that prove the Hillary Clinton lied to the Federal Bureau of Investigations when she told them that she didn't recognize classification markings in emails she received during her time as Secretary of State.

According to recently released FBI notes on their investigation into her use of a private email server, Clinton made the somewhat brazen claim during her three hour interview with investigators.

"When asked what the parenthetical ‘C’ meant before a paragraph within the captioned email, [Clinton] stated she did not know and could only speculate it was referencing paragraphs marked in alphabetical order," read the FBI’s notes from their interview.

On Tuesday's Hannity, Julian Assange revealed that Clinton's claim of ignorance is contradicted by evidence that has already been released by WikiLeaks.

"Hillary Clinton says she can't remember what a 'C' in brackets stands for, everyone in positions of government and at WikiLeaks knows it stands for 'classified confidential'," Assange told Sean.

"In fact, we have already released thousands of cables by Hillary Clinton...thousands of examples where she herself has used the 'C' in brackets and signed it off," Assange said, holding up an example of such a cable and indicating Clinton's signature. In addition, Assange said that Clinton received more than 22 thousand cables from others in which the 'C' in brackets appears.

Are you saying Hillary could not have forgotten about 22,000 {C} emails?

Are you sure it's not just political slander?

Give the lady the benefit of the doubt, brain damage from concussion can be severe.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/08/us...act-check.html

This goes on-and-on.

The FBI would know all about all this by now. Get over it.

Originally Posted by Guest

The FBI would know all about all this by now. Get over it.

So if there was a literal smoking gun of Hillary shooting someone in an obvious murder and the fbi had already seen the evidence no crime was committed.

I understand your logic.

But is the FBI covering it up or not disclosing all of it?

if so, this may bring to light facts we as tax payers don't now know

Originally Posted by Guest

The FBI would know all about all this by now. Get over it.

Yes, but they're political association and early release to the DOJ along with the secret meeting with Bill slick Willie Clinton the fix was in so any important information is irrelevant

Originally Posted by Guest

So if there was a literal smoking gun of Hillary shooting someone in an obvious murder and the fbi had already seen the evidence no crime was committed.

I understand your logic.

tax return?

Originally Posted by Guest

tax return?

Remember capital T.

Just more proof that Hillary is incredibly lazy. I don't fall for her being ignorant trick that she attempts to pull over on us. If she was so ignorant, she would not have graduated from Yale and become a lawyer. Nope, she is too lazy to care about the law as it pertains to her.

Trump becomes more and more a better selection of the two.

Originally Posted by Guest

Just more proof that Hillary is incredibly lazy. I don't fall for her being ignorant trick that she attempts to pull over on us. If she was so ignorant, she would not have graduated from Yale and become a lawyer. Nope, she is too lazy to care about the law as it pertains to her.

Trump becomes more and more a better selection of the two.

I wouldn't call it lazy. Sinister seems more like it. However, I do agree with your last statement wholeheartedly, even though I wasn't necessarily a fan in the beginning.

What gets me is that Julian Assange can hold up a copy of a signed email (one marked with a "c" no less) by Hilliary and yet they still want to say her email accounts were not proven to be hacked.......what am I missing here?!? Or do the powers that be really think we are ALL that stupid?

Originally Posted by Guest

I wouldn't call it lazy. Sinister seems more like it. However, I do agree with your last statement wholeheartedly, even though I wasn't necessarily a fan in the beginning.

What gets me is that Julian Assange can hold up a copy of a signed email (one marked with a "c" no less) by Hilliary and yet they still want to say her email accounts were not proven to be hacked.......what am I missing here?!? Or do the powers that be really think we are ALL that stupid?

WikiLeaks publishes more than 1,000 Hillary Clinton war emails | The Independent

Freedom of Information Act got those. Not a hacker.

I don't believe he hacks anything he receives hacked info organizes and re-publishes them

Originally Posted by Guest

WikiLeaks publishes more than 1,000 Hillary Clinton war emails | The Independent

Freedom of Information Act got those. Not a hacker.

Thank you for that. Having a hard time keeping up with all of this in the midst of a busy schedule and some big life changes going on, but I do think it's an important time for all of us to stay as informed as possible, so again, thanks.

Originally Posted by Guest

Thank you for that. Having a hard time keeping up with all of this in the midst of a busy schedule and some big life changes going on, but I do think it's an important time for all of us to stay as informed as possible, so again, thanks.

"Informed"? How? The "news"? Ha ha ha...

It's propaganda...what they WANT you the hear and think.