Originally Posted by Guest

WikiLeaks publishes more than 1,000 Hillary Clinton war emails | The Independent

Freedom of Information Act got those. Not a hacker.

FOIA CANNOT get classified documents, period. If there is a (C) on them, then anyone that packages the documents up for release would have seen the markings and would not have released them. That (C) stands for CONFIDENTIAL. I say again, FOIA does not release classified information.

Originally Posted by Guest

"Informed"? How? The "news"? Ha ha ha...

It's propaganda...what they WANT you the hear and think.

"THEY?" Maybe aliens? You had better go check your tin foil hat for leaks.

I think the almighty saviour, Jullian Assange, should just release them all. Why wait? So he can see his face on more Internet postings and newspapers. And don't release only the paper copies but the electronic versions as well so we can see all the routing to ensure they haven't been doctored by anyone. I can reproduce a doctored (or totally fake) email with no problem at all - I suspect so can he. I know lots of people are salivating like rabid dogs to get hold of them. I couldn't care less about any more emails, messages, books, papers, or videos from yesterday or from 20 years ago or more. The country needs to knock off all this BS of trying to get more "Ah Has" about the other guy and just get this stupid election of equally obnoxious candidates over with. If the Repub is elected, I fear for our country. If the Democ is elected, there will just be more of the same old crap-talk about past, current, or future lawbreaking without anyone actually doing something about it besides flapping their jaws in worthless hate-filled diatribes.

Originally Posted by Guest

I think the almighty saviour, Jullian Assange, should just release them all. Why wait? So he can see his face on more Internet postings and newspapers. And don't release only the paper copies but the electronic versions as well so we can see all the routing to ensure they haven't been doctored by anyone. I can reproduce a doctored (or totally fake) email with no problem at all - I suspect so can he. I know lots of people are salivating like rabid dogs to get hold of them. I couldn't care less about any more emails, messages, books, papers, or videos from yesterday or from 20 years ago or more. The country needs to knock off all this BS of trying to get more "Ah Has" about the other guy and just get this stupid election of equally obnoxious candidates over with. If the Repub is elected, I fear for our country. If the Democ is elected, there will just be more of the same old crap-talk about past, current, or future lawbreaking without anyone actually doing something about it besides flapping their jaws in worthless hate-filled diatribes.

I feared for our country when Obama was elected also. But, we still stand if not tall but still upright. I never expect to elect a god as president, but I do expect the one I vote for to be eligible for a security clearance. I used to do background investigations and special investigations for DOD and I have held clearances with DIA, CIA and State Dept, and I know that knowing how Hillary mishandled classified information would not only revoke any security clearance she might hold, but also qualify her for a long stay in a very secure cell where her visitors would be closely monitored if she were eligible for any at all. I am amazed at how she has been given a pass instead of a jail cell. Nope, even if I was the Democrat my father was, I would not be able to ever vote for someone like Hillary to lead our great nation.

Trump may not have all the attributes I wish in a president, but he was nominated by more Republican votes than any other candidate in history. Therefore, he is the peoples' choice. I'll be voting for him in this election. I will reevaluate my future vote in the next general election after I see how well he functions as president for the next four years.

Yes, Trump will be our next president. America is not ready for another Chicago mob style criminal leading our nation. I have faith in my fellow American to see how dangerous and corrupt Hillary is and then NOT vote for her.

There is NO perfect individual for president, but America can and will do better than elect a criminal that has no regard for her fellow American and no regard for national security. They'll vote for Trump.

I'll be voting for Trump. I don't even need to watch any debates. Hillary has disqualified herself with her criminal activities.

Assange: Hillary Clinton Whipping Up 'Neo-McCarthyist Hysteria' To Suppress The 1st Amendment

Julian Assange, the fugitive founder of WikiLeaks, is accusing Hillary Clinton and her presidential campaign of "trying to whip up a neo-McCarthyist hysteria" in an attempt to silence her political and media opposition. Assange made the accusation during his Thursday interview on The Sean Hannity Show.

In an earlier interview with The New York Times, Assange had accused the "American liberal press" of "erecting a demon that is going to put nooses around everyone’s necks as soon as she wins the election" by defending Clinton and failing to thoroughly cover the mountains of evidence of the Democratic nominee's corruption.

During Thursday's interview with Sean Hannity, Assange clarified his somewhat cryptic remark.

"The Democrats are always speaking about how terrible McCarthyism was, and it was in many ways," Assange told Hannity. "But at least the USSR actually existed then and there were actually Russian-influence campaigns which were serious. What we're seeing now is Hillary Clinton and her campaign trying to whip up a neo-McCarthyist hysteria."

Assange went on to say that Clinton's new McCarthyism is based around the spurious notion that her political opponents, both left and right, are all in league with Russia.

"She claims Donald Trump is effectively an agent of the Russians," Assange continued. "That WikiLeaks is an agent of the Russians. And where her campaign has also implied that Jill Stein, the Greens' leader, is a Russian agent. And the Intercept, which is an American publication, are effectively Russian agents."

In recent days, Democrats have indeed tried to paint Trump as a Russian sympathizer, if not an outright agent of Vladimir Putin. Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon has gone as far as to claim a "direct link" between Trump and the recent hacks of the DCCC and other high profile Democratic organizations.

One could be forgiven for seeing irony in Democrats' fear of a vast Russian conspiracy considering their chortling at Mitt Romney's 2012 insistence that Russia was the United States' chief geo-political threat.

Assange went on to explain that the Clinton campaign's end-game is a chilling of free speech and criticism should she ascend to the presidency.

"What kind of press climate is going to exist afterwards, especially if Hillary Clinton is elected?" Assange asked. "It will be perceived to be a validation of that hysteria, and so the press afterwards will be cracked down upon and online publishers and people on social media, you know, it will lead to a very harsh climate where the first amendment will be very significantly eroded."

Listen to Julian Assange claim that Hillary Clinton is whipping up "neo-McCarthyist" hysteria on The Sean Hannity Show:


<iframe width="610" height="377" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/KhkmKXX3LTw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Trump may know Putin, but Hillary is a recipient of donations from Soros, the destroyer of countries. The man that is working toward a one world order.