Originally Posted by Guest

Sheppard Smith is the only reason to turn on Fox.

Sent from my SM-T310 using Tapatalk

Can't stand Sheppard and will not listen to that idiot blather on and on with his stupid innuendos and theories. He sounds like a liberal, and probably is one.

Most of FOX is not conservative enough to suit me. And I think that the new, younger management are left leaning.

Originally Posted by Guest

Can't stand Sheppard and will not listen to that idiot blather on and on with his stupid innuendos and theories. He sounds like a liberal, and probably is one.

Most of FOX is not conservative enough to suit me. And I think that the new, younger management are left leaning.

Used to be that all the right wing wacko's would say that EVERY news outlet was bias except for Fox. Now you're saying even Fox isn't wacko enough for you? Wow, your options keep getting fewer and fewer. I guess you'll just have to listen to yourself pretty soon, or, that voice you keep hearing.

Originally Posted by Guest

The recounts showed us - NO RUSSIAN TAMPERING.

Media are such idiots.


A federal judge said there's no proof what so ever

Funny how the opposing side accepted this kind of verification about the candidate for president they got stuck backing.....that lost

Originally Posted by Guest

Dear Guest:

Let's say for the sake of discussion that it was the Russians that hacked the DNC.

If this is true then it begs the following two questions

1. Why is it that the DNC, Hillary, et al have not challenged the contents authenticity?

2. why is it that a foreign government ferrets out information important to our election and not our own news agencies? Where are all the Bernstein's and Woodwards?

Essentially despite the mainstream media manipulations in favor of progressives the American voter spoke. I do agree that there is hype on both sides but the Electoral College tally is not hype.

Personal Best Regards:

Do you even try to get information ?

1. NOBODY, at any time, has ever questioned the contents at all. We were hacked...this is what was leaked. What the heck are you even talking about ?

2. So you want our news agencies to hack into parties networks. Hard to respond to such a stupid remark. You also should look at what Bernstein thinks about all this crap. He has been clear, but in the websites you frequent, you will never see it.

A post from a man who reads and plagiarizes a Russian friendly website, and wonders why our press is not hacking files within the country pretty much sums up where your mind is

Originally Posted by Guest

Dear Guest:

Let's say for the sake of discussion that it was the Russians that hacked the DNC.

If this is true then it begs the following two questions

1. Why is it that the DNC, Hillary, et al have not challenged the contents authenticity?

2. why is it that a foreign government ferrets out information important to our election and not our own news agencies? Where are all the Bernstein's and Woodwards?

Essentially despite the mainstream media manipulations in favor of progressives the American voter spoke. I do agree that there is hype on both sides but the Electoral College tally is not hype.

Personal Best Regards:

By the way, I suppose it is only poetic justice that you whacko extremist on the right would speak of the Electoral College, as only the whacko left wing people discuss it. BUT, you only read whacko extreme things so you wouldnt know.

Wasn't yesterday's lead story about fake news sites and the harm they may cause?

How does hacking benefit Russia, China, North Korea. Stealing information, stealing technology, manipulating opinion. It is happening all the time. Do your own impartial research.

Is there some kind of international law against hacking ? I'm sure we would never do it.

Originally Posted by Guest

Is there some kind of international law against hacking ? I'm sure we would never do it.

Yes, it is called the Espionage Act.

Originally Posted by Guest

I was just watching Fox News and Sheppard Smith just told the truth about the Russian involvement in the presidential election.

Smith needs to be fired immediately! It'll be like a crack in a dam. We need to nip this in the bud. Sure hope Trump doesn't get wind of this.

How do you know that it was the truth ? Do you work for Putin ?
Or are you just reflecting the Talking Points put out by your fellow Socialists at the DNC ?

Originally Posted by Guest

Yes, it is called the Espionage Act.

who authored it ? In which chapter does it give the rules about computers ? Who signed it and agreed to it ? And you also believe we would abide by it ?

Originally Posted by Guest

How do you know that it was the truth ? Do you work for Putin ?
Or are you just reflecting the Talking Points put out by your fellow Socialists at the DNC ?

I am curious...you also dismiss ALL the intelligence agencies in the country.

WHO do you trust ? Are you relying in our election of the guy who says he does not need frequent briefings because he "is smart" ?

From USA Today:

Q&A: Why the CIA, FBI differ on Russian election hacking


Q: Is there suspicion that Russian hackers may have tampered with votes?

A: No. Federal officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson and FBI Director James Comey, have said that the decentralized nature of voting systems across the U.S. poses a difficult target for hackers.

"In our judgment, it would be very difficult to alter a ballot count in any one place and have a significant consequence,'' Johnson said in an interview last month with USA TODAY.

Originally Posted by Guest

From USA Today:

Q&A: Why the CIA, FBI differ on Russian election hacking


Q: Is there suspicion that Russian hackers may have tampered with votes?

A: No. Federal officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson and FBI Director James Comey, have said that the decentralized nature of voting systems across the U.S. poses a difficult target for hackers.

"In our judgment, it would be very difficult to alter a ballot count in any one place and have a significant consequence,'' Johnson said in an interview last month with USA TODAY.

Has someone in the news or on this forum ever made this claim ?

If so, I missed it...seems it was asked simply because if the other hacking.
Never saw this claim made, but whomever did is foolish

Gee hacking votes would require hacking into states , right ?

All intelligence agencies "hack" other countries, including the USA. It's what they do with the information that they obtain that matters. What do you think that NSA, the CIA and DIA do? People act surprised, like they don't even have a clue as to what is done by intelligence agencies.