You will vote for a person who flys the flag at half staff for those killed in WI but will not do the same for any military member who is killed. Its terrible that the indicent in WI happened, I am so sorry for the victims and their families, but flying the flag at half staff, this I can not forgive this person for. I will not call him a man because he is not one, nor is he a very good American. Shame on him.

Originally Posted by Figmo Bohica

You will vote for a person who flys the flag at half staff for those killed in WI but will not do the same for any military member who is killed. Its terrible that the indicent in WI happened, I am so sorry for the victims and their families, but flying the flag at half staff, this I can not forgive this person for. I will not call him a man because he is not one, nor is he a very good American. Shame on him.

FB Never in my life heck never in 10 lifetimes would I have believed an individual such as Obama would have ever been elected President of the United States. Clearly our failed education system has taken its toll. Obama followers seem to have had a break with reality following him blindly, like he was the Pied Piper, in spite of the obvious flaws in his policies, in spite for his disdain for America, and in spite of his clear intentions of reducing America to a European model.

Who he is and what he stands for can't be any cleaner than if he had a blinking neon sign hung cross his chest.

I personally believe that no one should be allowed to run for president unless and until they have served in the military for at least 4 years...and yes I include Mitt Romney. Not only would it give a candidate a better understanding of the military forwign policy and the need for a strong defense, it would also eliminate many questions involved in the vetting process.

Obama's attitude toward the military is dishonorable. As Commander in chief I would follow him to a store.

why is it stated that Romney "desperately" needs to win the swing states?

Is it not true Obama desperately needs to carry those states like he did in 2008.....or else!!!!!!

If some think Obama has the swing states locked up and they are his to lose is getting way too much fresh air or happy hours in TV!!!!

btk

Originally Posted by billethkid

why is it stated that Romney "desperately" needs to win the swing states?

Is it not true Obama desperately needs to carry those states like he did in 2008.....or else!!!!!!

If some think Obama has the swing states locked up and they are his to lose is getting way too much fresh air or happy hours in TV!!!!

btk

Opinions and polls ninety days before the election and even before the conventions, are as reliable as my stockbroker. Your favorite candidate (fill in the blank) will have numerous chances to step in it, or come out smelling like a rose. The debates will swing a large number of undecided voters, and the economy and world events, totally unforseen, will swing still others. Any conjecture about the result of the November elections at this time, are probably partisan, and laughable at best.

laughable daily....partisan 100%!

Originally Posted by eweissenbach

Opinions and polls ninety days before the election and even before the conventions, are as reliable as my stockbroker. Your favorite candidate (fill in the blank) will have numerous chances to step in it, or come out smelling like a rose. The debates will swing a large number of undecided voters, and the economy and world events, totally unforseen, will swing still others. Any conjecture about the result of the November elections at this time, are probably partisan, and laughable at best.

Allow me to take this opportunity to totally and 100% agree with you !!!

Been on this earth too long...seen too many "October surprises" !!

Originally Posted by RichieLion

Tea Party candidates are winning election after election. To discount something with the myopic phrase "Tea Party 'nuff said" shows how out of touch you are with the political currents.

It's please me to no end. Stay unfocused my friend.

Are you talking about the tea party senate candidates that cost the republican party the senate in 2010; Christine O'Donnell DE, Sharon Angle NV, James Raisch WV, Ken Buck CO, Joe Miller AK? Stay strong.

Originally Posted by janmcn

Are you talking about the tea party senate candidates that cost the republican party the senate in 2010; Christine O'Donnell DE, Sharon Angle NV, James Raisch WV, Ken Buck CO, Joe Miller AK? Stay strong.

No, I think the reference was to the ones who won the house !!! Those and a plethora of those who are winning in states all around this country.