Originally Posted by Guest

Please explain how my post reflected any hate or nastiness? YOu need to reread my post. I was not referring to anyone's belief about the candidates. I was speaking about how people on this thread resorted to name calling this person simply because he/she was going to vote for Hillary.

This is something, unfortunately, the republican party has gotten good at the last 7 years. Maybe you've seen the republican debates? Real classy.

Are you serious, or just stupid? "Old white guys" and "when they are dead" etc. is not more hateful than what one poster said about a movie quote that seemed quite pertinent? Your indignation is pretty disingenuous. Get over it. It won't be long before your PC will be just a bad figment of history. So, if you can't take a beatin', then don't enter the rumble.

Originally Posted by Guest

This is really very, VERY simple. The state Dept and DOJ found over 2000 confidential, secret and top secret documents in the e mails turned over from her PRIVATE server. This is a FELONY. It doesn't matter if they were marked. Simply possessing them is a FELONY. Case closed, she should already be in jail. God only knows what was in the 35,000 deleted e mails.
The excuse that they were not marked "classified" is both bogus and lame. Bogus because documents are stamped either "confidential", "secret" or "top secret", there is never a stamp of "classified". So she is telling the truth when she states she never had any documents that were "classified". Just like Bill had to define "sex" and "is". Clintonian semantics at it's best.
Lame because it is irrelevant. It's like your neighbor being hauled off in handcuffs for having 2000 kiddie porns on his home computer (a felony), then claiming they weren't marked "kiddie porn". I suppose that would be a witch hunt in your mind as well.

Good post!....

Originally Posted by Guest

Good post!....

TY. Now I'll just sit back and wait for the name calling from the left to begin. After all, they will have no logical response to the facts, so name calling is their fall back plan in all cases. Bring it.

[QUOTE=Guest;1194802]Even you should agree that we were ATTACKED on 9-11 and a response was necessary. But do not ever, EVER denigrate the service of those that put their lives on the line to defend our country.

Our country was attacked on 9/11 but NOT from Iraq. Even YOU should know that. Bin Laden was killed under the watch of Pres. Obama - not Bush!

Defending our country is a great thing but Vietnam and Iraq was not attacking our country.

[QUOTE=Guest;1194812]

Originally Posted by Guest

Even you should agree that we were ATTACKED on 9-11 and a response was necessary. But do not ever, EVER denigrate the service of those that put their lives on the line to defend our country.

Our country was attacked on 9/11 but NOT from Iraq. Even YOU should know that. Bin Laden was killed under the watch of Pres. Obama - not Bush!

Defending our country is a great thing but Vietnam and Iraq was not attacking our country.

Typical liberal. Nuff said.

[QUOTE=Guest;1194812]

Originally Posted by Guest

Even you should agree that we were ATTACKED on 9-11 and a response was necessary. But do not ever, EVER denigrate the service of those that put their lives on the line to defend our country.

Our country was attacked on 9/11 but NOT from Iraq. Even YOU should know that. Bin Laden was killed under the watch of Pres. Obama - not Bush!

Defending our country is a great thing but Vietnam and Iraq was not attacking our country.

I suggest you brush up on your reading comprehension. Did I say the "response" for 9-11 was directed at Iraq???? In fact, I separated Iraq and 9-11. What I did say is that 9-11 required a response---and that was against Al-Queda training camps supported by the Taliban in Afghanistan. Please wait a few more years before attempting revisionist history. Iraq and WMD is a whole different issue, very debatable, and all I pointed out is that Hilary supported the Iraq invasion.
YOU should also know that Bin Laden was killed by Seal Team 6 under STANDING ORDERS issued by George W. Bush. Obama had to be pulled off the golf course, then make a quick change of clothes so he could be seen in a photo op giving the FINAL approval. Note the military trusted him so little that they waited until the team was already at Bin Laden's compound before telling him---hard for him to say no at that point.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...7df_story.html

A little more information on the e-mails. It looks like a much deeper problem than just with Hillary Clinton and her staff.

[QUOTE=Guest;1194817]

Originally Posted by Guest

I suggest you brush up on your reading comprehension. Did I say the "response" for 9-11 was directed at Iraq???? In fact, I separated Iraq and 9-11. What I did say is that 9-11 required a response---and that was against Al-Queda training camps supported by the Taliban in Afghanistan. Please wait a few more years before attempting revisionist history. Iraq and WMD is a whole different issue, very debatable, and all I pointed out is that Hilary supported the Iraq invasion.
YOU should also know that Bin Laden was killed by Seal Team 6 under STANDING ORDERS issued by George W. Bush. Obama had to be pulled off the golf course, then make a quick change of clothes so he could be seen in a photo op giving the FINAL approval. Note the military trusted him so little that they waited until the team was already at Bin Laden's compound before telling him---hard for him to say no at that point.

Former Navy SEAL Rebukes Obama : snopes.com

And the facts are.....

[QUOTE=Guest;1194817]

Originally Posted by Guest

YOU should also know that Bin Laden was killed by Seal Team 6 under STANDING ORDERS issued by George W. Bush. Obama had to be pulled off the golf course, then make a quick change of clothes so he could be seen in a photo op giving the FINAL approval. Note the military trusted him so little that they waited until the team was already at Bin Laden's compound before telling him---hard for him to say no at that point.

Read the Snopes article and get your Obama hating head out of your duffel bag.

[QUOTE=Guest;1194833]

Originally Posted by Guest

Read the Snopes article and get your Obama hating head out of your duffel bag.

At least Uncle Sam gave me a duffel bag. What did you get?---food stamps?

Originally Posted by Guest

Will Probably Vote for Hillary Clinton Today.

Momma always said, stupid is as stupid does

Are you saying she was stupid when she had you?

[QUOTE=Guest;1194812]

Originally Posted by Guest

Even you should agree that we were ATTACKED on 9-11 and a response was necessary. But do not ever, EVER denigrate the service of those that put their lives on the line to defend our country.

Our country was attacked on 9/11 but NOT from Iraq. Even YOU should know that. Bin Laden was killed under the watch of Pres. Obama - not Bush!

Defending our country is a great thing but Vietnam and Iraq was not attacking our country.

Prejudicial, partisan, closed minded BS!

Originally Posted by Guest

Are you saying she was stupid when she had you?

Typical left wing response, as predicted. I was hoping for a MINIMALLY intelligent response, but alas, I knew better

[QUOTE=Guest;1194850]

Originally Posted by Guest

Prejudicial, partisan, closed minded BS!

Tell that to those who died or were wounded in service to their country and their families. Frankly, your post disgusts me. Maybe there's a home for you in North Korea.