[defrey12]

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725

How about most scientists agreeing about global warming and the cult of deniers just ignoring facts in favor of fantasy that the problem will just go away in 50,000 years.

Pardon me? We don’t ignore the scientific community. Just the ones PAID by the government to promote its agenda. The science does not deny warming…they just agree that humans didn’t cause it. And that we can do nothing to stop it. It is the natural process of our planet. It warms, then cools. It’s cyclical. We, in 2024, just happen to be alive during a warming period…over which we have ZERO control. It’s pure hubris to think otherwise.

[LeRoySmith]

Originally Posted by JMintzer

Which "Climate Change Movie" is your favorite?

The lorax, I thought it was just another harmless Dr Seuss book/movie but it turns out it's an indoctrination tool for the alarmist to use on kids. My kids were singing the songs and dancing around when I finally listened to some of the lyrics, it's a subliminal scare tactic.

[ThirdOfFive]

"Monday Breaks the Record for the Hottest ever Day on Earth"

I gotta be honest here. I read the article and gave it due thought, but what bothers me is that...can we really believe those Neanderthal weather statistics?

[ThirdOfFive]

Originally Posted by JMintzer

Maybe we should take a poll.

Which "Climate Change Movie" is your favorite?

That's easy. Waterworld.

But only because I like looking at a naked Jeanne Tripplehorn.

[G.R.I.T.S.]

Yes we do. People who believe that we can change the weather.

[Birdrm]

Originally Posted by Pugchief

UN Chief Appeals For Governments To Take Away Freedoms To Solve ‘Climate Change’

I am confused with the global message from group like the UN and WEF, they are asking for decreases in fossil fuels because the increased heat is killing our population. But, they also say the long range goal for the world is to reduce the overall population. These 2 ideas conflict so not sure exactly what they really want?

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by Birdrm

I am confused with the global message from group like the UN and WEF, they are asking for decreases in fossil fuels because the increased heat is killing our population. But, they also say the long range goal for the world is to reduce the overall population. These 2 ideas conflict so not sure exactly what they really want?

Not really----the UN wants to reduce the population of those that think, work, and produce and have assets. The heat they refer to as "killing" mainly affects the poor, migrants, and refugees---exactly the population that the UN can control. But I do believe the reference to reducing the world population is not a tenet of the UN, but rather the Bilderberg Group and carved on the Georgia Guidestones.

[Regorp]

Originally Posted by kansasr

I'm sure your grandchildren are going to enjoy living in Thunderdome.

The return of Atlantis!! Hail Atlantis!!

[GPGuar]

Ha, ha… like what??!!

[HORNET]

Again, don’t believe medias

[HORNET]

Money makers for some

[dougawhite]

Originally Posted by sounding

JM is correct. References to the 97% number is no different than a reference to consensus; but even Einstein had his fill of that trickery with his famous quote ... "Genius abhors consensus because when consensus is reached, thinking stops."

97%, or more, of scientists agreed Pluto was a planet. Until 'they' changed the definition. Same happens with climate and hurricanes, just change the definitions and get calamity.

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by dougawhite

97%, or more, of scientists agreed Pluto was a planet. Until 'they' changed the definition. Same happens with climate and hurricanes, just change the definitions and get calamity.

But the difference was nobody's livelihood depended on whether they thought Pluto was or was not a planet. But to promote the scientific truth of paleoclimatology and denounce the hoax of global warming is professional suicide. Anyone who doesn't believe that I will challenge to do the following: Get a degree in climatology and a job at a university. Then apply for a research grant to pursue your premise that global warming has nothing to do with human activity. See how much you get, see if you get tenure, and see if your papers are published. Rotsa ruck.

[CODYCAT]

Originally Posted by sounding

The July 25 Daily Sun said, "Monday Breaks the Record for the Hottest ever Day on Earth" - from an AP article. There are two reasons why the article falls short. First, that article fails to mention the unprecedented Tonga volcano, which injected unprecedented amounts of water vapor (earth's strongest greenhouse gas) into the stratosphere - where it is causing today's unprecedented global warming spike (see image). Second, that article fails to mention the multi-national EEMIAN ice core drilling project, which after extensive peer-reviewed analyses, shows that Earth was about 14 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than today as compared to the prior Interglacial Warm Period ... Greenland ice cores reveal warm climate of the past – Niels Bohr Institute - University of Copenhagen ... Details will be presented during the Aug 15 Weather Club meeting.

I really find it interesting that if you look at climate change predictions over the last 50 years or so none of them have come true. The one thing that seems consistent is that the people involved in these are making a fortune. A few years back, just being curious, I contacted a number of groups involved in saving the planet and mankind. I was shocked that everyone gave me the same response to the question “what can the average person do to help the problem ?” Every organization said, give them money for their projects and to call your politicians and yell at them to support climate change. I think this raises more questions than it gives answers.

[nn0wheremann]

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725

Houston, we have had a problem.

Houston has some real problems, for sure.