[sounding]

Originally Posted by fdpaq0580

This is TOTV, not a court case. A "NEWS" report was sited.
We are not your minions to provide you with data or, bring you your slippers, just because our information differs from yours. If we can find it, I'm assuming you can too.
Sheesh! 🫤🤨

If you found it, then please present the evidence. Until then, it's just hear-say.

[tophcfa]

Originally Posted by sounding

Hear-say is not evidence. If they were measured, then they were recorded. Where's the evidence of that measured report?

Originally Posted by sounding

If you found it, then please present the evidence. Until then, it's just hear-say.

So correct me if I’m wrong, but are you implying that all four major networks, along with the National Hurricane Center, are reporting the storms Cat rating based on hearsay, without any supporting wind speed evidence? I’m inclined to go with what they are reporting.

[fdpaq0580]

Originally Posted by sounding

Hear-say is not evidence. If they were measured, then they were recorded. Where's the evidence of that measured report?

CALL FOX! Maybe they can tell you! After all, it's not hear-say, it's FOX-say. Suppose you want someone here to provide their #. 😞😞😞

[sounding]

Originally Posted by fdpaq0580

CALL FOX! Maybe they can tell you! After all, it's not hear-say, it's FOX-say. Suppose you want someone here to provide their #. 😞😞😞

If Fox had that data point, they would have reported it -- just like video of the 1st moon landing -- otherwise it's just hear-say.

[fdpaq0580]

Originally Posted by Kenswing

Same old thread. Different title. I wonder how many posts the same five people will make in this one.

Really hope you're not disappointed. It's all in fun anyway.
Have a nice evening.
🙂

[sounding]

Originally Posted by kansasr

As of 6pm, as it comes ashore....

Interesting ... so far no one can find the "evidence" supporting a Cat 2 storm. When driving a car, we have evidence of speed through instrumentation ... likewise in hurricane science there is also evidence through instrumentation -- but when there's no evidence - then it's not science - it's something else.

[blueash]

Originally Posted by sounding

Hear-say is not evidence. If they were measured, then they were recorded. Where's the evidence of that measured report?

where is your evidence that it ever reached 90? You seem to have posted a jpeg of a media report. Apparently that is good evidence when you post it, but worthless when I do. Mine is from the national hurricane center. Now you can accuse them of making it up if they don't give you the name of the scientist who produced the data and they don't send you a personal email... but NORMAL people find data from the National Hurricane Center to be reliable, even when it hasn't been cleared thru Sounding.

[fdpaq0580]

Originally Posted by sounding

If Fox had that data point, they would have reported it -- just like video of the 1st moon landing -- otherwise it's just hear-say.

Heck! I'm not watching the news. I read what the others repeated. It's just a weather report, for gosh sakes. Yes, it is different from what you posted. So what? Hear-say, shmear-say, no big deal.

[fdpaq0580]

Originally Posted by blueash

where is your evidence that it ever reached 90? You seem to have posted a jpeg of a media report. Apparently that is good evidence when you post it, but worthless when I do. Mine is from the national hurricane center. Now you can accuse them of making it up if they don't give you the name of the scientist who produced the data and they don't send you a personal email... but NORMAL people find data from the National Hurricane Center to be reliable, even when it hasn't been cleared thru Sounding.

Such Fun! I guess I'm NORMAL! At least for today.
🙂🙃🫠😉

[sounding]

Originally Posted by blueash

where is your evidence that it ever reached 90? You seem to have posted a jpeg of a media report. Apparently that is good evidence when you post it, but worthless when I do. Mine is from the national hurricane center. Now you can accuse them of making it up if they don't give you the name of the scientist who produced the data and they don't send you a personal email... but NORMAL people find data from the National Hurricane Center to be reliable, even when it hasn't been cleared thru Sounding.

Normal has changed because of a new NHC philosophy, as described the longest serving Direction of the NHC ... start listening at 14 minutes ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzAQ6CIPqDI

[Rainger99]

The national weather service called it a category 2.

National Weather Service

[Taltarzac725]

Originally Posted by sounding

Hear-say is not evidence. If they were measured, then they were recorded. Where's the evidence of that measured report?

Planes from the US Air Force take measurements of various storms.

And weather people as well as amateurs take readings.

[sounding]

Originally Posted by Rainger99

The national weather service called it a category 2.

National Weather Service

Of course they did. The National Weather Service also says man is responsible for global warming -- but they never tell you how much "man-made" CO2 warms the earth.

[sounding]

Originally Posted by blueash

where is your evidence that it ever reached 90? You seem to have posted a jpeg of a media report. Apparently that is good evidence when you post it, but worthless when I do. Mine is from the national hurricane center. Now you can accuse them of making it up if they don't give you the name of the scientist who produced the data and they don't send you a personal email... but NORMAL people find data from the National Hurricane Center to be reliable, even when it hasn't been cleared thru Sounding.

Even Greg Postel from the Weather Channel is challenging the hurricane center as I do ... https://x.com/GregPostel/status/1833978091225641023

[Rainger99]

Originally Posted by sounding

Despite boiling oceans and epic heat waves, Francine only attained Cat 1 status and never had a chance of attaining the anticipated major hurricane status. Why? The Tonga volcano prevented the hurricane helper, called La Nina, from developing, and it made the tropical atmosphere more stable - thus inhibiting tropical activity.

Isn’t your evidence of it being a category 1 hurricane also hearsay?

As I understand hearsay, 99% of our knowledge is based on hearsay in that we have no personal knowledge of most events.

But people rely on hearsay for many of their daily decisions.