[sounding]

Originally Posted by Bill14564

Still NO cooling trend in the data, still NO answer from you to the points made in posts #67.

I only answer to data -- which shows a 7-year (even though slight) cooling trend. Both satellite and surface temperature (both government supplied) show the same. Most likely it will warm again (due to ongoing AMO and PDO ocean cycles) before making a stronger dip into cooling trends.

[Bill14564]

Originally Posted by sounding

I only answer to data -- which shows a 7-year (even though slight) cooling trend. Both satellite and surface temperature (both government supplied) show the same. Most likely it will warm again (due to ongoing AMO and PDO ocean cycles) before making a stronger dip into cooling trends.

It is the data that shows NO cooling trend as explained in post #67. Your inability to refute that (except for your attempt at proof by emphatic assertion) can only be taken as an acknowledgement that you know you are wrong but just don't want to admit it.

This "yes it does! no it doesn't!" exchange was fun as a third grader but is old today. Provide some analysis of YOUR data to make YOUR point or everyone still reading this thread will know that you have nothing.

[sounding]

Originally Posted by Bill14564

It is the data that shows NO cooling trend as explained in post #67. Your inability to refute that (except for your attempt at proof by emphatic assertion) can only be taken as an acknowledgement that you know you are wrong but just don't want to admit it.

This "yes it does! no it doesn't!" exchange was fun as a third grader but is old today. Provide some analysis of YOUR data to make YOUR point or everyone still reading this thread will know that you have nothing.

Sorry -- I only have government data to show -- which shows a 7-year cooling trend. Anyone can plot and see the same. Here 's the satellite source data ... Latest Global Temps « Roy Spencer, PhD And here again is the plotted data with linear trend line -- downwards.

[Bill14564]

Originally Posted by sounding

Sorry -- I only have government data to show -- which shows a 7-year cooling trend. Anyone can plot and see the same. Here 's the satellite source data ... Latest Global Temps « Roy Spencer, PhD And here again is the plotted data with linear trend line -- downwards.

One final time, that graph was addressed in post #67. What it shows is successful cherry-picking of the data.

Happily, the ignore list is only three clicks away.

[sounding]

Originally Posted by Bill14564

One final time, that graph was addressed in post #67. What it shows is successful cherry-picking of the data.

Happily, the ignore list is only three clicks away.

Correct and right on target. The cherries are now trending downward, while prior to 2015 the cherries were trending upward. I once had a cherry tree. I would pick cherries going up and down the ladder -- so I am very familiar with cherry picking.

[Taltarzac725]

Big Bertha (howitzer - Wikipedia) I wonder how many cow farts Big Bertha put out with each shell? Or, the Paris Gun?

Of course, the Guns of Navarone were fictional.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ORnL9WmOEo

[jimjamuser]

Originally Posted by Kenswing

When are you going to actually post with a hint of accuracy?

A Bump Stop? Energy Suspension 9.9101G All Purpose Bump Stop - Pack of 2 https://a.co/d/dLmjl0p
I’m sure you’re referring to Bump Stocks which are already illegal.

There’s no such thing as a gun silencer. There are sound suppressors which will reduce the report of a fired round but it doesn’t come even close to silencing it. A suppressor is more of a hearing protective device than some nefarious tool of death and destruction that you try to make them out to be. Show us some data on how many mass shootings involved a “silenced” weapon.

Please. I implore you to stop posting with your feelings and start using real easily verified information.

Awwww. I am truly sorry that my expression of feelings and emotions would hurt someone else's feelings. I was merely trying to express myself in a TRUE freedom of speech manner. In the future, I will try to turn it down. And I DO know the difference between silencers and suppressors. The general reader here would NOT have a clue as to that distinction, only gun enthusiasts would. In 1956 my father show me how he attempted to make his own version of a silencer for a 22 rifle. It was able to neither silence nor suppress the shot report (nice technical word there for those ballistic aficionados) it was just as loud as originally. And I again apologize in advance because some may be offended by my mention of my father.
..........And "guilty as charged" that IS the 2nd time that I have written bump stop instead of the correct term bump stock..........but I do know what my general intent was ......to show that a person could easily and cheaply convert a semi-auto into effectively an automatic. And I believe that it WAS illegal, BUT (I think.....don't take it to the bank) that a JUDGE recently UNDID that law to make them back to LEGAL. And further, I believe that it was NRA membership money that provided the lawyers to make that CASE. Now, I am out on a limb on this one because I have NOT yet asked Mr Google if he/she would support my limited memory on that one. Please feel free to saw off that limb if that is the important thing to do when using a Forum.........try to shoot down (guns reference) any and ALL people that one has a difference of opinion about.

I keep making the mistake of believing that the IDEA of a public forum is for members to COOPERATE by voicing BOTH facts and OPINIONS so as, to come to a BETTER understanding of local, state, national, and world news and situations. I, myself, read posts with plenty of spelling errors, many, many punctuation errors (some just run everything together without a comma or a period), and EVEN some posts that are barely intelligible (as if written by a 3rd grader). But, I RESIST the temptation to JUMP on them and criticize them.

[jimjamuser]

Originally Posted by sounding

I only answer to data -- which shows a 7-year (even though slight) cooling trend. Both satellite and surface temperature (both government supplied) show the same. Most likely it will warm again (due to ongoing AMO and PDO ocean cycles) before making a stronger dip into cooling trends.

OK to continue to refute this DELUSION that is trying to be spread here.........I would like to have an explanation of why SCIENTIFIC MEASUREMENTS of ocean levels (all around the world) have RISEN significantly in the last few years ?????? That would logically seem to point to glaciers melting due to Global Warming.
........I can't wait to be told, "that I have NOT factored in the bombastic current flow and the greater sunspot activity due to the sun's periodic orbital oscillations".

[jimjamuser]

Originally Posted by sounding

Sorry -- I only have government data to show -- which shows a 7-year cooling trend. Anyone can plot and see the same. Here 's the satellite source data ... Latest Global Temps « Roy Spencer, PhD And here again is the plotted data with linear trend line -- downwards.

Oh, that repulsive graph again. Oh, I'm going to be sick. And I so enjoyed my breakfast.

[sounding]

Originally Posted by jimjamuser

OK to continue to refute this DELUSION that is trying to be spread here.........I would like to have an explanation of why SCIENTIFIC MEASUREMENTS of ocean levels (all around the world) have RISEN significantly in the last few years ?????? That would logically seem to point to glaciers melting due to Global Warming.
........I can't wait to be told, "that I have NOT factored in the bombastic current flow and the greater sunspot activity due to the sun's periodic orbital oscillations".

If sea level rise is significant, then how come I have to drive so far to get to the sea shore?

[Two Bills]

Originally Posted by sounding

If sea level rise is significant, then how come I have to drive so far to get to the sea shore?

Where is the data as proof of these long journeys to the sea shore?

[sounding]

Originally Posted by Two Bills

Where is the data as proof of these long journeys to the sea shore?

Just watch as the Maldives slowly sink below the ocean -- as so many climate alarmists so want to believe ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCwTrHlyWrc

[sounding]

Originally Posted by jimjamuser

Oh, that repulsive graph again. Oh, I'm going to be sick. And I so enjoyed my breakfast.

I'm sure this 100% solar-powered ski resort won't be showing that graph ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0F40a7IxKs

[JMintzer]

Originally Posted by jimjamuser

OK, but logically, cattle eat grass, cattle are BIG.....so they MUST have some method for turning grass into protein for their huge bodies. So they have to munch a lot of grass and sent that through their 2 or 4 stomach compartments. Somehow that IS producing large quantities of METHANE and it must come out of one or the other end of the cattle. I seem to remember reading something about them BURPING.
........It is also possible that the methane escapes from the cow pies. Eventually, I will Googe this very "STICKY" subject.

Cows... The original "Plant Based Meat"...

And it's not "2 OR 4 stomach compartments"... It's definitely 4... Take the "L"

[JMintzer]

Originally Posted by Bill14564

Of course the charts in the article look similar, the article uses exactly the same data! And, they cherry-picked the data and misinterpreted it to try to show a cooling trend.

See post #67 for an explanation of what the data really shows.

So, you're saying he should "See post #67"?