[tenorgirl]

Originally Posted by Coal Miner

Good. Because of the NRA we have criminals roaming our streets armed to the teeth. The lives this cost and the money we spend for law enforcement is a shame.

Because of criminal activity we have criminals roaming our streets with stolen guns or guns bought through the underground. People intent on committing a crime will not let rules or regulations stand in their way.

[billethkid]

Hmmmmnnnn....over 5 million folks (members) being duped or not knowing any better!?

I don't think so!

[jimjamuser]

Potato and potaaaadoooo. You know what a banana clip is. And the point is that it is unnecessary on a hunting rifle. Look for the point of a post, not details to criticize.

[jimjamuser]

Originally Posted by Number 10 GI

Clubs, knives, guns, bricks, rebar, iron pipe, and anything else used to kill or injure a person is an assault weapon. If you intentionally injure or kill someone it is an assault. We don't have a gun, knife or bludgeon violence problem in this country, we have a violence problem and that is what needs to be addressed.

Fine !!!!!!

[billethkid]

Originally Posted by Number 10 GI

Clubs, knives, guns, bricks, rebar, iron pipe, and anything else used to kill or injure a person is an assault weapon. If you intentionally injure or kill someone it is an assault. We don't have a gun, knife or bludgeon violence problem in this country, we have a violence problem and that is what needs to be addressed.

Tolerated, allowed and supported by far too many of those hiding behind the anti gun agenda.

[GoodLife]

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby

The lawsuit has nothing to do with sensible or nonsensible gun ownership. The lawsuit has nothing to do with gun ownership at all. The lawsuit has nothing to do with guns. Or the Second Amendment. At all.

AT
ALL

The lawsuit is about a particular lobby group that serves manufacturers of a particular product, taking money from individual members for dues, while those members may or may not work for those manufacturers, and that lobby group subsequently skims the dues money and other donations to use on things that have nothing to do with the supposed purpose of the organization.

Now, that might not be a horrible crime, to some of you. It is to me. But to make matters worse, this organization has non-profit status under the tax code. Which is to say - it is tax-exempt. They benefit from dues that don't necessarily go to the thing they claim should be tax exempt.

Tax exemption is based on a very strict set of criteria. They have violated that set of criteria - supremely. So they're cheating the government, they're cheating members, they're cheating pretty much everyone, including the manufacturers who "donate" millions to them every year to politically support those manufacturers as a lobby.

If it was widgets that was the product - if it's Doritos. If it's KFC. If it's the cannibis growers foundation. If it's the black shoelace coalition.

Whatever the product is...

this organization exists, at this point in history, to support the manufacture of the product. It has no care for its membership, the individuals who actually pay to be members of it. This is proven by the fact that they have skimmed millions and used that membership money for things that have nothing to do with helping members with anything at all.

That is what this lawsuit is about.

The more they insist it's not about guns.....it's about guns

"The Lady doth protest too much methinks"

[cathy34787]

One at a time!

[Bucco]

Originally Posted by GoodLife

The more they insist it's not about guns.....it's about guns

"The Lady doth protest too much methinks"

This strikes me as a response to a factual post on what the thread is supposed to be about, by someone unfamiliar with truth and facts, except those that come from him.

The doggone investigation and charges have Zero to do with guns.

It is about crooks who steal from others and spend it on them selves, present themselves in a phoney manner, lie and cheat.

Trying to change the subject of threads seems habit forming to some

[bluecenturian]

Originally Posted by Fredman

I quit supporting them because of their position on ar15’s and ak47’s. No need for anyone to own those weapons. I have my share of guns but no seni-automatics

What type of guns do you own then, muzzle loaders. I hope you realize a 9mm handgun is a semi automatic. 1 pull of the trigger is 1 round fired.

[Nevermore]

Originally Posted by Northwoods

The New York attorney general, filed a lawsuit today seeking to dissolve the National Rifle Association, alleging that years of corruption irreparably undermined its ability to operate as a nonprofit.

This will be interesting...

About time

[bluecenturian]

Originally Posted by tophcfa

No responsible firearms owner needs assault type rifles. The reason these firearms are protected is because they are a line of defense against the moonbats going after hand guns and hunting rifles. Once the anti-gun moonbats get rid of assault rifles they will set their sights on their next target, and then the next, and the next, until only criminals possess firearms.

Responsible firearm owners would gladly have assault type weapons become illegal if it came with an iron clad agreement to end all further crusades against other types of firearms.

I wish people knew what an “Assault Rifle” is. It is a firearm that had rapid fire with automatic firing. That means 1 pull of the trigger will fire as many rounds as are fed into the bolt. These type of fire arms are highly regulated and not authorized by the public without a Federal Firearm License issued by the ATF.

An”AR15” is NOT an assault rifle. It is a semi automatic firearm. 1 trigger pull is 1 round fired. You must release the trigger and pull it again to get another round fired. This is the same as a handgun including a revolver. The only difference is the rifle has a longer barrel designed to fire a round with more accuracy by creating greater bullet spin.

And please understand that the “AR” does not mean “Assault Rifle.”

[Topspinmo]

Originally Posted by jimjamuser

Potato and potaaaadoooo. You know what a banana clip is. And the point is that it is unnecessary on a hunting rifle. Look for the point of a post, not details to criticize.

Then limit the clip, no high powered rifle should have more than 5 rounds. Next we can argue over what hi-powered? Now, home defense would be different matter?

[Topspinmo]

Originally Posted by Fredman

I quit supporting them because of their position on ar15’s and ak47’s. No need for anyone to own those weapons. I have my share of guns but no seni-automatics

You might want to add mini 30 to list? Twice the rifle of the knock-offs. Best of both worlds plenty in clip, compact, semiautomatic, and .308 Round can knock’em down 400 yards plus.

[transplanted]

Originally Posted by Northwoods

The New York attorney general, filed a lawsuit today seeking to dissolve the National Rifle Association, alleging that years of corruption irreparably undermined its ability to operate as a nonprofit.

This will be interesting...

And hours later, the NRA filed against New York Attorney General Letitia James, accusing her of defamation and violating the org's right to free speech. Fingers pointing at each other - what's new?

[transplanted]

Originally Posted by Coal Miner

Good. Because of the NRA we have criminals roaming our streets armed to the teeth. The lives this cost and the money we spend for law enforcement is a shame.

The topic is about white collar crime within the NRA - not about guns.
But since you went there... as we all know, criminals do not obey laws (like only owning 'legal' guns) so outlawing guns, or specific types of guns, will not stop the criminals intent on using them to carry out their desires. Guns don't make them criminals, their choices - followed by their actions, make them criminals.