[gomoho]

Originally Posted by njbchbum

even if the villages had more dog parks - how would we train the dog owners to take their dogs there?

That's a no-brainer. If they build it we will come. The current parks are not sufficient. The one south of 466 is way too small to even be called a dog park. A large park with some shade would have us lining up to get it. A dog park is one of the MOST social places I have ever been and people love to bring their dogs.

[Taltarzac725]

Some dogs are poorly socialized and do not get along with other pooches at all. I run into these frequently when walking my dog around Lynnhaven. Could be other reasons why some dog owners never bring their pets to the local dog parks.

[Bogie Shooter]

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725

Sounds like Pennecamp needs a dog park.

Lots of Lynnhaven dog owners walk their pooches near the Lynnhaven pool and there are no dead spots from where dogs pee there. Most of the people walking the dogs at the Lynnhaven pool also clean up after their pets. Some even clean up poop from other dogs if they have extra bags. I have done this myself. I do think trash belongs in a trash bin. There are trash bins at the postal areas so people should be able to put their dog poop in these receptacles unless they make them only for recycling. Garbage smells. You do not have to stand near garbage cans.

I do not buy the slippery slope argument when it comes to dog poop and pee. Most of the people in the Villages look out for other people and do not seem to mind dealing with life's realities when it comes to having neighbors who have pets.

Poop and pee from dogs is a serious problem in some cities like San Francisco and New York City where there is often very little in terms of a sense of community. I just do not see those kinds of attitudes so much in the Villages.

No poop!

[Taltarzac725]

Originally Posted by Bogie Shooter

No poop!

You'd probably find dog poop in the trash cans of many other municipalities and other entities around the country.

Still do not understand the need to dictate others enjoyment of the Villages by banning dog feces from postal center trash cans. That probably results in lazier people leaving it where it lies so to speak so they do not have to stink up their garage and/or automobile interior which they would smell a great deal more often than on a very quick trip to the postal center. An enclosed garage in the hot summer can get quite rancid from the poop in residents' trash. My understanding is that the postal station trash cans are emptied every night. Most of the people I see at Lynnhaven Postal Center are there for less than 2 minutes and then gone.

Sounds a lot better than the stink in a hot garage which could last for 4 days or so; in between garbage pick-ups.

[Bogie Shooter]

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725

You'd probably find dog poop in the trash cans of many other municipalities and other entities around the country.

Still do not understand the need to dictate others enjoyment of the Villages by banning dog feces from postal center trash cans. That probably results in lazier people leaving it where it lies so to speak so they do not have to stink up their garage and/or automobile interior which they would smell a great deal more often than on a very quick trip to the postal center. An enclosed garage in the hot summer can get quite rancid from the poop in residents' trash. My understanding is that the postal station trash cans are emptied every night. Most of the people I see at Lynnhaven Postal Center are there for less than 2 minutes and then gone.

Sounds a lot better than the stink in a hot garage which could last for 4 days or so; in between garbage pick-ups.

I don't live in other municipalities, I live in TV........no poop in trash cans!

[Cisco Kid]

Been reading a lot of posts about TV.
I walk about 3 - 5 miles a day with my dogs.
I do pickup, But I don't carry a sponge for pee.
If I make the move will I safe ?
Or will a mob chase this Yankee out of the hood.
What is the most dog friendly place to buy.
5pd LuLu Maltipoo
12pd Cloie Bichion
Not a lot of pee
:

[graciegirl]

If we had a dog park, say Mr. Morse built us one or twelve. Then there would be those who would not like to live next to them because of the barking and the pooping.

There is no way the developer could win on this one. I bet this has been discussed a zillion times by the family. Can't you just see them talking about this over Thanksgiving dinner?

[Barefoot]

Originally Posted by graciegirl

If we had a dog park, say Mr. Morse built us one or twelve. Then there would be those who would not like to live next to them because of the barking and the pooping. There is no way the developer could win on this one.

GG, I usually agree with you, but not this time. I think more dog parks would be a big win for the Developer. It would keep dogs away from the Postal Stations, obviously a hot button for a lot of people.

Speaking of noise, a lot of residents don't appreciate the noise from early pickleball players. It doesn't bother me, but I've heard neighbors complain. I agree that dog parks wouldn't work in existing residential areas. The parks would have to be built closer to commercial or industrial areas. For instance, the newest dog park in Bonita is beside the Firehall.

The Villages did manage to build three dog parks, so presumably they could build more. I haven't heard any complaints from residents about the existing dog parks (other than they are very small). However it's just wishful thinking on my part. I hate to read all the negative posts that are critical about people walking their dogs. I don't have a horse in this race .. we quite happily make the daily trek to a huge private dog park, and we're happy to pay to take our dogs there.

[gomoho]

I will be interested to see who comments on the most pet friendly place to live. I live in Hadley off Ambrosia and have 2 dogs of my own. When we walk in the morning we run into quite a few dogs being walked. To this point I have not been shot at, yelled at or threatened in anyway. BUT my dogs aren't in anyone's yard so I can't say if we are dog friendly or not. Just can tell you we have a lot of dogs walking around here. I think you might be better of asking the question "what is the least dog friendly village to live in"?
Don't let the dog haters deter your move - I had the same hesitation after reading these threads 'cause I have never lived anywhere that this was such a hot topic. But we went ahead with "living the dream" and so far it's worked out with my fur kids. Good luck to you and your decision. P.S. Only been here 3 months so my experience is limited.

[Bonnevie]

wow, this is a hot topic. I'm hoping if I buy a CYV there will be other dog people around. I always clean up after my dogs. If dog parks are built, people will use them. have one near where I live now and everyone knows each other and it's a nice social time. I did go to the small park next to the firestation. met some nice people there but it doesn't compare to what I have now. glad to hear there's a really nice one nearby.

[Mikeod]

Originally Posted by gomoho

Don't let the dog haters deter your move -. .

I am always dismayed when I read that those that don't want someone's pet doing their "thing" on their property being classed as dog haters. I, and I think most others, don't hate dogs. I just don't think your dog has a right to use my lawn or shrubs as a toilet, whether there is damage or not. If I want the property I paid for to be free of dog pee or poop, that is my decision, not someone else's. You may think your dog is doing no harm, and that may be true. But the next dog, and the ones after that, who sniff the first "mark" have to mark also, and so on, and so on.

My dog never was allowed on anyone's property, even to sniff, because I couldn't be sure she would decide to leave a calling card or not.

With regards to more dog parks, I doubt it would have any great effect on this. Those that allow their pets to use the postal stations or neighbors lawns would probably think transporting the dog to a dog park to be inconvenient, and still use the postal stations and neighborhood landscaping.

[gomoho]

I only mentioned dog haters because of people who so frequently say keep your dog in your yard. But guess what that is not healthy for me or the dog. They say if you are overweight you are not walking your dog enough. Maybe people are forgiving when a dog who has done his business where he is supposed to makes a mistake and has to relieve himself again. But for heaven's sake there is much vitriol thrown about when it come to these animals whose name backwards just happens to spell GOD!

[ariel]

I take my little guy in my yard first to get him to go before his walk. But sometimes he has to go again on the walk and it usually happens in the street. I always pick up wherever he does it. Sometimes he lifts his leg and nothing comes out - it's just a ritual for him when he "reads the pee mail". I have to admit that sometimes he has gone on the edge of someone else's property both in TV and here in our NC neighborhood. I've been very lucky to have had neighbors who were forgiving and I don't mind if their pooches occasionally go in my yard as long as they pick up.

[Bogie Shooter]

Originally Posted by mikeod

I am always dismayed when I read that those that don't want someone's pet doing their "thing" on their property being classed as dog haters. I, and I think most others, don't hate dogs. I just don't think your dog has a right to use my lawn or shrubs as a toilet, whether there is damage or not. If I want the property I paid for to be free of dog pee or poop, that is my decision, not someone else's. You may think your dog is doing no harm, and that may be true. But the next dog, and the ones after that, who sniff the first "mark" have to mark also, and so on, and so on.

My dog never was allowed on anyone's property, even to sniff, because I couldn't be sure she would decide to leave a calling card or not.

With regards to more dog parks, I doubt it would have any great effect on this. Those that allow their pets to use the postal stations or neighbors lawns would probably think transporting the dog to a dog park to be inconvenient, and still use the postal stations and neighborhood landscaping.

[Roaddog53]

Originally Posted by mikeod

I am always dismayed when I read that those that don't want someone's pet doing their "thing" on their property being classed as dog haters. I, and I think most others, don't hate dogs. I just don't think your dog has a right to use my lawn or shrubs as a toilet, whether there is damage or not. If I want the property I paid for to be free of dog pee or poop, that is my decision, not someone else's. You may think your dog is doing no harm, and that may be true. But the next dog, and the ones after that, who sniff the first "mark" have to mark also, and so on, and so on.

My dog never was allowed on anyone's property, even to sniff, because I couldn't be sure she would decide to leave a calling card or not.

With regards to more dog parks, I doubt it would have any great effect on this. Those that allow their pets to use the postal stations or neighbors lawns would probably think transporting the dog to a dog park to be inconvenient, and still use the postal stations and neighborhood landscaping.

THANK YOU,,,!