Thank you. Now we can add the DDR to the list:

Nazi = socialist
USSR = socialist

DDR and socialist

Please continue to fortify that post at your leisure.

Originally Posted by Guest

My party has been taken over by radical left wing groups. I am a moderate independent. I have no party! I am going to vote for John Kasich in the Fl. primary, so I am going to be a Republican. Did you listen to John Kasich in the last debate? Every time he spoke not a peep out of the crowd. This is the person with experience in Washington, and running a major state, and no one wants to listen to him. I wonder why?

I asked a lot of questions. You didn't answer any of them. Not one! You ever hear of "guilt by silence". You know what the problem is with the conservatives. How about sharing it with someone not as gifted as you? Since when is asking questions, preaching?

You referred to the same article twice. I guess it was so good it was worth repeating. Come on man! An article written a person that worked for the last three republican administrations, and you don't think that it is going to be one sided.

"Clinton instituted three strikes and you are out, and proposed adding 100,000 police officers." Mass incarnation was a result of what he did. Clinton is admitting the policies have caused problems. Obama is addressing those problem. I will copy and paste Clinton's views now on the next post.

"Obama is more liberal than Clinton on gay rights, religious liberties, abortion rights, drug legalization, and climate control." No kidding. The country has moved on almost all of these items.

"Clinton cut spending, and produced a surplus. Under Obama spending and deficits reached record levels". What shape was the country in when Clinton took office versus Obama took office? If you going to compare people, you have to start on a level playing field. Figures lie, and liars figure. That is exactly what Wehner did played with numbers to support his argument.

What do you think would happen, if you compared any of the Republicans running for congress to President Reagan? They have moved so far to the right that it is scary.

Concerning the Tea Party, they are nothing, but noise. Boehner didn't want to listen to them any more. Ted Cruz is probably the only one in the Senate that they support. Boehner called him a jackass. They are less than 10% in the House. Have anyone of them proposed anything other than repealing ACA 54 times? Boehner asked them for a replacement. Their response according to Boehner was "it's too hard".


The president of the Village's Tea Party wrote an article where she called Obama use of "fast track" as an unthinkable overreach by our current president. It's unconstitutional. Fast track was used by very Republican president, since Reagan. Did the Constitution change when Obama became president?

Concerning Black Lives Matter, they are not Marxists. They are the worst kind of racists. When that lady jumped on stage at a Sander's event, he should have smacked her in the head.

"It has gotten so bad with the move to Socialism, communism and Marxism" That statement is total nonsense. How about supporting that with facts?

Start with explaining how the ACA is a left wing socialist program that has its roots in the Heritage Foundation, and Romneycare! I really would like you to explain that one. According to you I am really stupid, so go into simple detail.

Of course my comments are falling on deaf ears, because you refuse to listen. I am an moderate independent, but everyone that doesn't agree with everything you say is a left wing liberal. No, we know who the problem is here.

With all due respect, you lost all credibility with your "theme" remark which is hogwash totally.

You have no idea of what you are speaking of and please please spare us your little oft repeated speech about party. You are one of the most anti Republican, pro democratic posters on here with no doubt.

And your comment on Tea Party.....please without referring to the leftist notes, tell us what you think the Tea Party stands for and what about it you do not like ?

If we had ignore, you would make that list for sure.

If I may add, my comment on being democrat was not meant to disparage Democrats in anyway. It was meant to disparage you as a poster and your huypocrisy

Originally Posted by Guest

If I may add, my comment on being democrat was not meant to disparage Democrats in anyway. It was meant to disparage you as a poster and your huypocrisy

and an embarassment to most democrats.

Originally Posted by Guest

With all due respect, you lost all credibility with your "theme" remark which is hogwash totally.

You have no idea of what you are speaking of and please please spare us your little oft repeated speech about party. You are one of the most anti Republican, pro democratic posters on here with no doubt.

And your comment on Tea Party.....please without referring to the leftist notes, tell us what you think the Tea Party stands for and what about it you do not like ?

If we had ignore, you would make that list for sure.

You, sir, are operating without a clue. How many questions have I asked, and how many have you answered? The second part of the questions is real easy. That would be none.

I have a playbook. Well, yours is very clear. Never answer any questions. Never accept responsibility for anything. Always try to degrade anyone that doesn't agree with you. In other words, act like a three year old, and you excel at it.

So I am an anti Republican, but I intend to vote for John Kasich. That is nice trick. Please explain to me, how that is possible? Damn, another question that you can't answer.

Take a damn good look at most of the Republicans posts on this forum, and tell me that most of them are not over the top partisan. Any attempt to bring them back to the center is considered left wing liberal nonsense.

Originally Posted by Guest

You, sir, are operating without a clue. How many questions have I asked, and how many have you answered? The second part of the questions is real easy. That would be none.

I have a playbook. Well, yours is very clear. Never answer any questions. Never accept responsibility for anything. Always try to degrade anyone that doesn't agree with you. In other words, act like a three year old, and you excel at it.

So I am an anti Republican, but I intend to vote for John Kasich. That is nice trick. Please explain to me, how that is possible? Damn, another question that you can't answer.

Take a damn good look at most of the Republicans posts on this forum, and tell me that most of them are not over the top partisan. Any attempt to bring them back to the center is considered left wing liberal nonsense.

You do have a problem with vocabulary, don't you? Have you ever posted a comment that didn't use some vulgar or demeaning verbiage? Oops, a question, and we know how you hate answering questions. Do you really think anyone believes your "I'm a gonna voter fer Kasich?" You know as well as I do that Kasich has no chance in this race. It's pretty fair bet on your part that you can say "well he ain't thar so I be gonna vote for a socialist." Yep, I am making fun of you, because you are so easy to read.

Originally Posted by Guest

Take a damn good look at most of the Republicans posts on this forum, and tell me that most of them are not over the top partisan. Any attempt to bring them back to the center is considered left wing liberal nonsense.

Of course we are partisan. Just like you are partisan. You act like that is unusual. Talk about those without a clue.

Bring us back to "center?" Why would we want to be center? That's moderate, luke warm, temperate, etc. We need extreme now to fix what Obama has hosed up. Obama has done more damage to our country than WWI, WWII and the depression did combined. Congratulations liberals, you have almost gotten your anarchy you yearn for.

Originally Posted by Guest

You, sir, are operating without a clue. How many questions have I asked, and how many have you answered? The second part of the questions is real easy. That would be none.

I have a playbook. Well, yours is very clear. Never answer any questions. Never accept responsibility for anything. Always try to degrade anyone that doesn't agree with you. In other words, act like a three year old, and you excel at it.

So I am an anti Republican, but I intend to vote for John Kasich. That is nice trick. Please explain to me, how that is possible? Damn, another question that you can't answer.

Take a damn good look at most of the Republicans posts on this forum, and tell me that most of them are not over the top partisan. Any attempt to bring them back to the center is considered left wing liberal nonsense.

I want to be very careful how I say this, because there is a group who likes to say that the Republicans on here bully them, and for all I know you are one of them...fits your tone.

Problem is you IGNORE issues and talk in such generalities it is very difficult to respond to you and you turn every response you get into an attack about some questions you never even ask.

Now you can label me a Tea Party bigot....a Tea Party racist....a Tea Party faggot....all familiar terms.

And stealing a page from you....what specific Tea Party belief are you opposed to ?

Originally Posted by Guest

I want to be very careful how I say this, because there is a group who likes to say that the Republicans on here bully them, and for all I know you are one of them...fits your tone.

Problem is you IGNORE issues and talk in such generalities it is very difficult to respond to you and you turn every response you get into an attack about some questions you never even ask.

Now you can label me a Tea Party bigot....a Tea Party racist....a Tea Party faggot....all familiar terms.

And stealing a page from you....what specific Tea Party belief are you opposed to ?

He's never answered that question yet. None of the liberals that slur the TP have ever been able to answer that question. To answer it the way they would like, would to be admitting that they are UN-American with Anti-American ideology. Because there is not one item that the TP stands for that is not Constitutional and American. They tried to push the racist thing but found out that the only occurrence of a racist placard was staged by liberals. And they are the ones that beat up a black TP member at a town hall meeting.

Originally Posted by Guest

He's never answered that question yet. None of the liberals that slur the TP have ever been able to answer that question. To answer it the way they would like, would to be admitting that they are UN-American with Anti-American ideology. Because there is not one item that the TP stands for that is not Constitutional and American. They tried to push the racist thing but found out that the only occurrence of a racist placard was staged by liberals. And they are the ones that beat up a black TP member at a town hall meeting.

The whole lot of you are too funny. You have never answered any of my questions, but I am suppose to answer yours? Why, because you are you? I didn't know that all of you commanded so much respect.

Obama has screwed up everything. The Republicans have nothing to do with the current state of affairs in Washington. I don't know how any one of you can say that with a straight face.

Is that right John Kasich has no chance? Why! He has experience both in Washington, and running a state. He accepted the Medicaid portion of ACA against the wishes of the republicans in his state. What a crime it is accepting a program that helps the poor. He can and will work with the Democrats to restore sanity back to Washington, and that is his biggest sin. Which party is the problem?

You can tag me with anything that you want, but we all know why. Anyone that doesn't agree is the enemy. Concerning name calling, take a damn good look at my posts, and the responses. Have you ever seen one that didn't contain a comment meant to demean me? That's is what you do, and are not very good at it.

Originally Posted by Guest

The whole lot of you are too funny. You have never answered any of my questions, but I am suppose to answer yours? Why, because you are you? I didn't know that all of you commanded so much respect.

Obama has screwed up everything. The Republicans have nothing to do with the current state of affairs in Washington. I don't know how any one of you can say that with a straight face.

Is that right John Kasich has no chance? Why! He has experience both in Washington, and running a state. He accepted the Medicaid portion of ACA against the wishes of the republicans in his state. What a crime it is accepting a program that helps the poor. He can and will work with the Democrats to restore sanity back to Washington, and that is his biggest sin. Which party is the problem?

You can tag me with anything that you want, but we all know why. Anyone that doesn't agree is the enemy. Concerning name calling, take a damn good look at my posts, and the responses. Have you ever seen one that didn't contain a comment meant to demean me? That's is what you do, and are not very good at it.

We don't answer your questions because yours don't have anything to do with the thread, and because your questions are just your attempt to bait and divert. And your questions are lame anyway. As your mentor Pelosi once said, you're just "astro turf."

So, if you can't answer the same TP question that has been thrown at you a million times, then why don't you take your slurs and run home.

Originally Posted by Guest

We don't answer your questions because yours don't have anything to do with the thread, and because your questions are just your attempt to bait and divert. And your questions are lame anyway. As your mentor Pelosi once said, you're just "astro turf."

So, if you can't answer the same TP question that has been thrown at you a million times, then why don't you take your slurs and run home.

Good post.

Stand by for another lecture on how everyone here will not blame congress or blame Republicans....he thinks this because he does not read and just wants to bait.

Included in his response will be how he will answer no questions because..whatever the soup of the day might be.

And of course, his shot at Tea Party for which he can supply no reason, I xcept they won't vote how he wishes them to.

Originally Posted by Guest

We don't answer your questions because yours don't have anything to do with the thread, and because your questions are just your attempt to bait and divert. And your questions are lame anyway. As your mentor Pelosi once said, you're just "astro turf."

So, if you can't answer the same TP question that has been thrown at you a million times, then why don't you take your slurs and run home.

My questions don't have anything to do with the thread "falling poll numbers". Your question about what the Tea Party stands for is right on point of this thread. I asked several questions that were right on point about the Tea Party affect on the Republican Party, and you didn't answer. I wonder why? Is it that the truth hurts?

That is all you have to know about the Tea Party. The Constitution, that they always tout, states that the majority rules. They are not in the majority, but want to get their way on everything. If they don't get their way, they make it difficult, if not impossible, to get anything done. That is what the Tea Party is. They always want to take their ball, and go home. If we don't get our way, we are going to shut down the government. How many times have they threaten that.?

Originally Posted by Guest

My questions don't have anything to do with the thread "falling poll numbers". Your question about what the Tea Party stands for is right on point of this thread. I asked several questions that were right on point about the Tea Party affect on the Republican Party, and you didn't answer. I wonder why? Is it that the truth hurts?

That is all you have to know about the Tea Party. The Constitution, that they always tout, states that the majority rules. They are not in the majority, but want to get their way on everything. If they don't get their way, they make it difficult, if not impossible, to get anything done. That is what the Tea Party is. They always want to take their ball, and go home. If we don't get our way, we are going to shut down the government. How many times have they threaten that.?

Read and learn


"Even though nearly every politician, teacher, journalist and citizen believes that our Founders created a democracy, it is absolutely not true. The Founders knew full well the differences between a Republic and a Democracy. They repeatedly and emphatically said that they had founded a Republic.

Article IV Section 4, of the Constitution "guarantees to every state in this union a Republican form of government".... Conversely, the word Democracy is not mentioned even once in the Constitution. Madison warned us of the dangers of democracies with these words,

"Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths...",
"We may define a republic to be ... a government which derives all its powers directly or indirectly from the great body of the people, and is administered by persons holding their offices during pleasure for a limited period, or during good behavior. It is essential to such a government that it be derived from the great body of the society, not from an inconsiderable proportion or a favored class of it; otherwise a handful of tyrannical nobles, exercising their oppressions by a delegation of their powers, might aspire to the rank of republicans and claim for their government the honorable title of republic." James Madison, Federalist No. 10, (1787)

"A wise man will not leave the right to the mercy of chance, nor wish it to prevail through the power of the majority. There is but little virtue in the action of masses of men." Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862)"

Republic vs. Democracy


"

Tea Party members of congress were elected within their state and are subject to more voting based on what they do.

Tea Party members are voting how they vote because the people elected them to do just that.