Don't do as I do, do as I say. It was just a small loan, I didn't mean to forget to tell anyone.

Are you replying to a post, starting a new thread or what? Try again, using some help from your sitter, or come back in a few years.

Originally Posted by Guest

Are you replying to a post, starting a new thread or what? Try again, using some help from your sitter, or come back in a few years.

You know my mother used to say "I you can't say something nice then don't say anything".

You might want to take that to heart!

To the second post on this thread. Half the people on here are a-- h----

Originally Posted by Guest

You know my mother used to say "I you can't say something nice then don't say anything".

You might want to take that to heart!

No, I did not know your mother, and I hate to disparage your mother, but I doubt she said exactly that.....

Originally Posted by Guest

You know my mother used to say "I you can't say something nice then don't say anything".

You might want to take that to heart!

Does that include the first post?

Should be a fun time tonight for Donald.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...-for-ted-cruz/

So, to the OP, is there a point or subject to the one line opinion? Is there some reference point or link that you forgot to provide? Or, maybe this is a waste of attention.

The other post is about his "birther" status. This post is about his not reporting a loan of 1M from Wall Street, but I wouldn't expect you genius Tea Party people to know how to read. Just blame things on the liberal media and one of the best Presidents ever, President Obama.

Originally Posted by Guest

Should be a fun time tonight for Donald.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...-for-ted-cruz/

This should have been linked on the first post. Then it wouldn't require mind reading to figure out the subject.

When I was reading the article, I thought it had come from the Huffington Post instead of the Washington Post. I guess they are about the same.

A lot of liberals seem to be getting real nervous. So nervous that they are concentrating on Cruz's every detail. That is a good thing, though. And I am saying that as a conservative. I want our future leaders to be completely vetted, so that we don't end up with an inept amateur like the one currently taking up valuable space and wasting oxygen in the White House. But, come on liberals, how about vetting Trump also? Or, are you so afraid of him that you are hiding your children before opening up on him? I think the liberals are scared of Trump.

Originally Posted by Guest

The other post is about his "birther" status. This post is about his not reporting a loan of 1M from Wall Street, but I wouldn't expect you genius Tea Party people to know how to read. Just blame things on the liberal media and one of the best Presidents ever, President Obama.

Do you have any idea of what you are typing? What are you talking about? The other post? This one? Did you read the OP? Does it make sense to you? Is there a link to, or a reference point for that post? Sorry, but I am not a mind reader or a liberal fairy so I have to rely on some sort of subject for the first post in a thread.

Originally Posted by Guest

This should have been linked on the first post. Then it wouldn't require mind reading to figure out the subject.

When I was reading the article, I thought it had come from the Huffington Post instead of the Washington Post. I guess they are about the same.

A lot of liberals seem to be getting real nervous. So nervous that they are concentrating on Cruz's every detail. That is a good thing, though. And I am saying that as a conservative. I want our future leaders to be completely vetted, so that we don't end up with an inept amateur like the one currently taking up valuable space and wasting oxygen in the White House. But, come on liberals, how about vetting Trump also? Or, are you so afraid of him that you are hiding your children before opening up on him? I think the liberals are scared of Trump.

What about the "don't consider the
source, consider the story" reply one gets questioning Breitbart links. Anyhow, here is a link you can relate to:

Cruz failed to disclose Goldman loan during Senate run | Fox News

Borrowing $1M and not reporting it is a totally separate issue than the "birther" issue and this post is about that problem for Cruz.

Trump started the "birther" issue on Cruz when Cruz caught and passed him in some polls.

Trump has been vetted and is falling in the polls. He is the amateur with no government experience and has gone bankrupt 4 times.

I guess you have been asleep while the POTUS created jobs, brought back the stock market, got millions of people health insurance, etc.

This post is about Cruz and borrowing money and not reporting it. Like the rest of the Tea *******, you change the subject when you can't respond to the OP.

Originally Posted by Guest

Borrowing $1M and not reporting it is a totally separate issue than the "birther" issue and this post is about that problem for Cruz.

Trump started the "birther" issue on Cruz when Cruz caught and passed him in some polls.

Trump has been vetted and is falling in the polls. He is the amateur with no government experience and has gone bankrupt 4 times.

I guess you have been asleep while the POTUS created jobs, brought back the stock market, got millions of people health insurance, etc.

This post is about Cruz and borrowing money and not reporting it. Like the rest of the Tea *******, you change the subject when you can't respond to the OP.

How can you tell what the subject of the post is? Are you the OP? If so, then why didn't you make that clear on the first post?

Originally Posted by Guest

What about the "don't consider the
source, consider the story" reply one gets questioning Breitbart links. Anyhow, here is a link you can relate to:

Cruz failed to disclose Goldman loan during Senate run | Fox News

If you read my comment, I did comment on the information contained in that article. Even though it is slanted, I agreed that vetting the candidate is a good thing. My comment about the slant of the article and the comparison of it to the Huffington Post, was just an observation/opinion. If the loan that Cruz obtained is an issue, then it should be examined. I also believe that Hillary's involvement with her email regarding private donations and it's relevance to it being on a work related server to be important too. I believe that Hillary's finances should also be examined.

I have no objection to the candidates being vetted, and never have. As long it is legitimate vetting and not a witch hunt, such as giving a haircut type hazing in high school, or lying by the head Senator about someone not paying their taxes.