Originally Posted by Guest

No, I did not know your mother, and I hate to disparage your mother, but I doubt she said exactly that.....

Not sure whats so funny but I think she did! Or it might have been "If you can't say anything nice then don't say anything at all!

Originally Posted by Guest

Yes it does.

Then you are not very well informed.
Abortion, pornography, war against Christianity, etc is a Democrat trait. No wonder Hillary and Sanders has you ignorant voters backing them. You don't even know what you are following. Maybe they should have a civics test before allowing idiots to vote.

Originally Posted by Guest

Then you are not very well informed.
Abortion, pornography, war against Christianity, etc is a Democrat trait. No wonder Hillary and Sanders has you ignorant voters backing them. You don't even know what you are following. Maybe they should have a civics test before allowing idiots to vote.

...so what would you be doing on Election Day since you obviously would not be voting?

Originally Posted by Guest

...so what would you be doing on Election Day since you obviously would not be voting?

Unlike the non-answers to the question that Dems give to the difference between a Democrat and a socialist, I know that answer....no difference. Funny thing is that you liberals are offended by the label of "liberal" but embrace the label of "socialist." When is the last time ANY American endorsed socialism? I doubt even FDR, another socialist would publicly welcome the label of 'socialist."

Originally Posted by Guest

Unlike the non-answers to the question that Dems give to the difference between a Democrat and a socialist, I know that answer....no difference. Funny thing is that you liberals are offended by the label of "liberal" but embrace the label of "socialist." When is the last time ANY American endorsed socialism? I doubt even FDR, another socialist would publicly welcome the label of 'socialist."

What world are you in? The problem that you have is anyone that is not far right is a liberal. Every liberal is a socialist. Having social programs doesn't make you a socialist. You think that putting tags on people to demean them is perfectly acceptable.

We live in a free country. However if you don't agree with everything we put forward, you should shut up, and accept it. So, the far right wants a dictator as president, so he will get everything he wants without compromising anything. If you not a white American, you should leave. Blacks are nothing but trouble. Hispanics are probably illegals, and should be deported. Asians work for nothing, and bring down wages for everybody. Indians can stay, because we love gambling. They also stay on the reservations that we provided for them. Does that about cover it?

Originally Posted by Guest

What world are you in? The problem that you have is anyone that is not far right is a liberal. Every liberal is a socialist. Having social programs doesn't make you a socialist. You think that putting tags on people to demean them is perfectly acceptable.

We live in a free country. However if you don't agree with everything we put forward, you should shut up, and accept it. So, the far right wants a dictator as president, so he will get everything he wants without compromising anything. If you not a white American, you should leave. Blacks are nothing but trouble. Hispanics are probably illegals, and should be deported. Asians work for nothing, and bring down wages for everybody. Indians can stay, because we love gambling. They also stay on the reservations that we provided for them. Does that about cover it?

That's funny. The party of socialism that says socialism is not really socialism. The party of slavery is telling Republicans that they don't care about minorities. How many ethnic groups do your candidates represent? Let's see.......white old people. How many ethnic groups are represented by GOP candidates? Let's see.........Female, Latino, black and we even have a few Christians on the roster. Meanwhile, the Democrat candidates fight over who is the most socialist. And yet, you still wonder why the label of "socialist"....or was it that you were insulted by the label of "liberal?" What was your complaint again? Oh yes, you were saying that just because liberals believe in socialist programs and want the gov to run everything, that's not socialism. That's being a progressive...ha,ha. Sorry about laughing, but socialism is not exactly being progressive. It's more like being regressive, since socialism has been around for a while. But, Republicans are regressive, right?

Originally Posted by Guest

Then you are not very well informed.
Abortion, pornography, war against Christianity, etc is a Democrat trait. No wonder Hillary and Sanders has you ignorant voters backing them. You don't even know what you are following. Maybe they should have a civics test before allowing idiots to vote.

I'll give you one as a republican example, David Vitter. Being up on republican news you can name a lot more.

Originally Posted by Guest

I'll give you one as a republican example, David Vitter. Being up on republican news you can name a lot more.

I'm going to guess at what you are attempting to say. You can correct me if I am wrong in trying to read your mind in what you are replying to or what you are attempting to suggest. Are you suggesting that David Vitter is a socialist? Are you attempting to find some dirt on Republicans? Or, do you have a thing for Vitter? Ok, I give up. What are you attempting to sell?

I KNOW! You are once again attempting to divert from the thread. I knew it! I figured it out, right?

Originally Posted by Guest

What world are you in? The problem that you have is anyone that is not far right is a liberal. Every liberal is a socialist. Having social programs doesn't make you a socialist. You think that putting tags on people to demean them is perfectly acceptable.

We live in a free country. However if you don't agree with everything we put forward, you should shut up, and accept it. So, the far right wants a dictator as president, so he will get everything he wants without compromising anything. If you not a white American, you should leave. Blacks are nothing but trouble. Hispanics are probably illegals, and should be deported. Asians work for nothing, and bring down wages for everybody. Indians can stay, because we love gambling. They also stay on the reservations that we provided for them. Does that about cover it?

You covered most of it, but don't forget about the Republican war on women -
the extreme pro-life stances of some of the candidates that say that abortion is wrong even in cases of rape and incest; Republican efforts to redefine rape to reduce access to abortions; the refusal to support a minimum wage increase for low wage workers, the majority of whom are women; Cruz voted against the Violence Against Women act and has even targeted contraceptives.

Originally Posted by Guest

You covered most of it, but don't forget about the Republican war on women -
the extreme pro-life stances of some of the candidates that say that abortion is wrong even in cases of rape and incest; Republican efforts to redefine rape to reduce access to abortions; the refusal to support a minimum wage increase for low wage workers, the majority of whom are women; Cruz voted against the Violence Against Women act and has even targeted contraceptives.

Typical liberal rhetoric. You are so predictable that it's tiring.

Republican war on woman? Tell that to Hillary.
Extreme pro-life? Exactly how do you define extreme? Is there such a thing as extreme pro-life? Ooops, maybe wanting to ban executions of murderers? Woops, that's a liberal thing. That don't count. Let's see, if we don't agree to murdering innocent babies and parting them out for research, that's extreme? You do know that your argument about rape and incest is stupid, don't you? Less than 1% of abortions are due to rape or incest. So, there goes that argument. Oh well, next...........
Refusal to support FEDERAL minimum wage increase? You are correct. Only an idiot would not see the difference between State minimum wages and a blanket, across the board Federal min. wage. If you are not careful with regulating min. wages, you end up putting thousands of employees out of work. Do you wish to put thousands of FULL-TIME workers out of work?
Not that I want to defend Cruz because I have no intention of voting for him anyway, but why do you believe that the taxpayer should pay for contraception? Is it that expensive that you can't afford it? Am I suppose to pay for someone else to have sex without regards to responsibility? Would you like the taxpayer to provide you with your mate also? Are you that needy that you feel the gov has to "fix you up?" Tell me, have you no self-respect or pride? Do you really NEED the gov to be your nanny? Really?? I will pray for you.

Here's how it totals out:

Liberals:
Abortion = taxpayers must pay for it, even if they are against it.
Contraception - taxpayers must pay for it even if they are against it.
College Education = Taxpayers must pay for it.
Health Care insurance = must pay for it even if you don't need it, or go to jail
Unemployment = Two year paid vacation because you don't like the job offers
Mortages = Must be forgiven because the value of your home went down, along with the value of your car.
Free Phones = Taxpayer must pay for it, because everyone else has one.

Guns = liberals don't like them so no one should have one.
Religion = liberals don't believe so we should ban it, except for Muslims.
Wealthy = No one should be better than anyone else so liberals want to confiscate their money and give it to the government to pay for five million dollar vacations to Hawaii.
Drugs = legalize them because the addict is going to get them anyway.
Pubic vulgarity = You have to be open minded, freedom of speech unless it isn't PC to women, ethnic groups or sexual deviants.

Did I leave anything out that you liberals don't NEED?

Republicans:
Guns =if we don't like them, we don't buy them
Religion = If we don't believe, we don't go to church
Wealthy = we admire them and want to be wealthy by having the opportunity to achieve on our own without the gov saying we can't.
Abortion = we believe in life of the innocent and don't believe we should be force to subsidize the murder of babies.
Contraception = Pay for it yourself or don't have sex.
Unemployment = If you lose a job, then you take two or three until you find the one you want.
Free Phones = Phones are over rated. Buy your own if you want one
Mortgages = You signed for it, you pay for it. No execuses
College = Get a job and pay for it yourself. It's not my obligation to pay for yours. I have my own family to support.
Unemployment = six months is more than plenty to find another job. A year or more becomes a vacation. Get off your behind and take a job. You don't like the job, then do something about it.
Public vulgarity? Keep your dirty mouth to yourself. You embarrass yourself as well as your family. Grow up.
Drugs = They lead to addiction. Liberals really want to legalize them so that they can collect tax on them. Comparing them to alcohol is comparing a bad idea with another bad idea.

So, you want to know where the scale settles?

Liberals = equal more gov control = socialism = socialism + removal of religion = communism. Not the American way.

Cruz is not a socialist. His father is a moot point because we are not voting for his father. Just like we didn't vote for Obama's Muslim/socialist father or his communist mentor, Frank Davis or his friend domestic terrorist bomber, Bill Ayers or his white hating preacher Rev. Wright. Or his wife that finally loved America once her husband was elected.

Does that make you feel better? You weren't planning to vote for Cruz either, so it's all a moot point.

Originally Posted by Guest

Sorry, but that doesn't work either. Wikipedia isn't always that accurate. You called me a Nazi and I corrected you. Nazis were socialists. Hitler was a socialist. Socialism is the left, not the right. They are extreme and that is exactly what you liberals/socialists want for America. So, don't use your socialism to label me. Being conservative has nothing to do with your radical need to change America into Europe. You really ought to travel outside of the U.S. I have lived overseas for about half my life, in different countries. I have seen the elimination of the middle class in socialist countries. They have re-labeled the lower class is all they have done. Socialist countries have a lower class and the elite class(wealthy). And this is what you wish on America. Our military has fought wars against the socialists and communism, and now you liberals, cowards want invite it into our country. You have no right to ruin this country. If you don't like this country, and prefer Europe then move to Europe But, don't sell your home because you will come crying back to us in short order.
If you don't call people names than you won't have to defend your ignorant statements. If you think my use of liberal is a slur, then maybe you should think about it. Your party is welcoming with open arms, SOCIALISM. Bernie Sanders is welcome in the Democrat party. Hillary and Debbie Whatshername can't even tell you the difference. Is this the party that your fathers fought wars to protect?

Will you be leaving the country when the democrats win the presidential election? Don't let the ore hit you in the ---.

Originally Posted by Guest

Will you be leaving the country when the democrats win the presidential election? Don't let the ore hit you in the ---.

I don't know if I will still be around when the Socialists win another election. It may be a long time from now. First they have to secret some more unwitting illegals in, bribe them to vote for them, and then make it illegal for Republicans and Independents to vote. And we all know that this would entail work. Something that doesn't come easy for liberals. So, no I probably won't be leaving anytime soon. Although, I do like another socialist country, Australia. If I have to go socialist, it may as well be a good country to finish up my life in.

Naw, I think it is going to be interesting to see how Trump stirs things up in D.C. when he is crowned. I have a feeling that it will make for some good TV viewing. I might have to upscale to a 70" 4K size.

Originally Posted by Guest

I don't know if I will still be around when the Socialists win another election. It may be a long time from now. First they have to secret some more unwitting illegals in, bribe them to vote for them, and then make it illegal for Republicans and Independents to vote. And we all know that this would entail work. Something that doesn't come easy for liberals. So, no I probably won't be leaving anytime soon. Although, I do like another socialist country, Australia. If I have to go socialist, it may as well be a good country to finish up my life in.

Naw, I think it is going to be interesting to see how Trump stirs things up in D.C. when he is crowned. I have a feeling that it will make for some good TV viewing. I might have to upscale to a 70" 4K size.

Don't let a kangaroo kick you in the crotch, mate. They don't like tea bags.

Originally Posted by Guest

That's funny. The party of socialism that says socialism is not really socialism. The party of slavery is telling Republicans that they don't care about minorities. How many ethnic groups do your candidates represent? Let's see.......white old people. How many ethnic groups are represented by GOP candidates? Let's see.........Female, Latino, black and we even have a few Christians on the roster. Meanwhile, the Democrat candidates fight over who is the most socialist. And yet, you still wonder why the label of "socialist"....or was it that you were insulted by the label of "liberal?" What was your complaint again? Oh yes, you were saying that just because liberals believe in socialist programs and want the gov to run everything, that's not socialism. That's being a progressive...ha,ha. Sorry about laughing, but socialism is not exactly being progressive. It's more like being regressive, since socialism has been around for a while. But, Republicans are regressive, right?

Thanks for lobbing a softball at me. Where did the good old boys run to when civil rights laws were passed in the 60's? That wouldn't be the party of Lincoln would it? Were have they stayed in the last 50 years? That wouldn't be the party of Lincoln would it?

What happened when the party of Lincoln states were told that they could now change voting laws in their state without prior approved. South Carolina instituted voter id laws that were directed against minorities, and did it in record breaking time. Texas followed suit. Which party controls both states? That wouldn't be the party of Lincoln would it?

It appears that the change in party didn't change the attitude for these good old boys. The Republican now owns them. So, good luck to you.

You can't be bragging about your female, black, and Latino candidates? I can't believe anyone is that stupid. Your female candidate is being completely ignored. Is the under card like telling someone to walk five steps behind you? Your black candidate is one of a token few in your party. He is so clueless that he wouldn't get the majority of black votes. Your Latino candidates are running away from the race as fast as they can. If they support a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants, they wouldn't get any votes in the primaries. You have a few Christians. Praise the lord! There really is a God in heaven.

The liberals or socialists as you like to call them want to run everything. Government control of industry. An end to capitalism! You can say this with a straight face! If it didn't come from a far right Republican, that would sound crazy. Have no fear, the far right will stop this from happening, because they are excellent at fixing problems that only exist in their minds. Reality is a concept that is totally foreign to them.

61 votes to repeal Obamacare, and one gets through the Senate by a procedural maneuver, this is the Republicans idea of getting something done. They sit there and clap for a job well done. Isn't it nice to get paid for doing nothing? They want to cut social programs. Maybe they should start by cutting their own pay.

Originally Posted by Guest

I don't know if I will still be around when the Socialists win another election. It may be a long time from now. First they have to secret some more unwitting illegals in, bribe them to vote for them, and then make it illegal for Republicans and Independents to vote. And we all know that this would entail work. Something that doesn't come easy for liberals. So, no I probably won't be leaving anytime soon. Although, I do like another socialist country, Australia. If I have to go socialist, it may as well be a good country to finish up my life in.

Naw, I think it is going to be interesting to see how Trump stirs things up in D.C. when he is crowned. I have a feeling that it will make for some good TV viewing. I might have to upscale to a 70" 4K size.

Refresh my memory, who was our first socialist president? Since you have declared that Hillary is a socialist boarding on communist, you might be leaving in the very near future. Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out. Australia may not let you in. You know how much that they hate the far right.

If Trump gets elected, you will need a 70" TV just to fit his head on the screen. You have to make sure that bright orange is one of the colors. It took Trump a long time to get the color right. How the hell do you go from bark brown to bright orange? Don't worry; it is real hair. There isn't anything phony about Trump. He has a habit of toning down his inflammatory talk, but his hair he will never tone down.

Very president's hair changes to grey during his presidency. You want to bet dollars to donuts that if Trump gets elected his hair color won't change?