WikiLeaks - The Podesta Emails

Asante is not the issue and never was.

The source of his info is the only issue.

Not political....it is a matter of national security this time.

interesting and you support the HRC with a private server right?

Originally Posted by Guest

interesting and you support the HRC with a private server right?

Please explain the relationship between Asante and Clinton

Originally Posted by Guest

Please explain the relationship between Asante and Clinton

She does/has done the deed and the wrongs.

He reports and exposes it.

The media and the democrat "loyalists" support the no matter who no matter what candidate (as long as the are a democrat).

Originally Posted by Guest

She does/has done the deed and the wrongs.

He reports and exposes it.

The media and the democrat "loyalists" support the no matter who no matter what candidate (as long as the are a democrat).

I suppose you do understand that the current Wikileaks being used by Trump in his campaigning was a hack if the DNC, not Clinton.

Listen I am the polar opposite of a Clinton supporter, but you folks who totally ignore the corruption and absolute lies on the right, and ignore issues and simply lay everything on going after Clinton personally better get your facts straight on this.

How about some time a Trump supporter come on here and discuss his economic plans and taxes. Those are open for discussion, but then you would hear about the total and complete disavowing of those plans by virtually every economist in the country.

Or, you could discuss his foreign affair plans which indicate a plan to simply shut down our allies, dissolve our pacts (unless they pay) etc and of course the total and complete lack of support for those.

Or, you could discuss his plans for destroying ISIS and terrorism. Oops..he has none of those.

Or, you could discuss the trade throughout the world where he wants to renegotiate...of course before you start understand he alone cannot do that and his proposals will send prices and inflation through the roof.

Or, you could discuss how he brings the nation together, except for those he has insulted personally. Or work with congress who he single handily is handing to Dem control.

Or his immigration plans, where he falsely blames all the problems on immigrants.

Or you could discuss how he pays our debt which his proposals would simply send into orbit.

Lots of stuff, but keep in mind he will be busy in court...has that rape of a 13 year old coming up...those Trump U suits coming up and of course his suits against the 11(thus far) women claiming physical abuse.

Or, as it appears from reading on here, the ONLY issue he has is hate for Clinton..

Lots of choices...check Breitbart and see what Steve wants discussed but he ONLY discusses birth certicates and the like

Or...and not sure how to couch this....Trump has blamed everyone he can for anything bad...even our current fight in Iraq against ISIS he says was inspired to protect Clinton....and SNL is also, as he says is in on the rigging thing.

Maybe a thread either to determine the last time he ever made an error or who is left he hasn't blamed everything on.

Originally Posted by Guest

I suppose you do understand that the current Wikileaks being used by Trump in his campaigning was a hack if the DNC, not Clinton.

Listen I am the polar opposite of a Clinton supporter, but you folks who totally ignore the corruption and absolute lies on the right, and ignore issues and simply lay everything on going after Clinton personally better get your facts straight on this.

How about some time a Trump supporter come on here and discuss his economic plans and taxes. Those are open for discussion, but then you would hear about the total and complete disavowing of those plans by virtually every economist in the country.

Or, you could discuss his foreign affair plans which indicate a plan to simply shut down our allies, dissolve our pacts (unless they pay) etc and of course the total and complete lack of support for those.

Or, you could discuss his plans for destroying ISIS and terrorism. Oops..he has none of those.

Or, you could discuss the trade throughout the world where he wants to renegotiate...of course before you start understand he alone cannot do that and his proposals will send prices and inflation through the roof.

Or, you could discuss how he brings the nation together, except for those he has insulted personally. Or work with congress who he single handily is handing to Dem control.

Or his immigration plans, where he falsely blames all the problems on immigrants.

Or you could discuss how he pays our debt which his proposals would simply send into orbit.

Lots of stuff, but keep in mind he will be busy in court...has that rape of a 13 year old coming up...those Trump U suits coming up and of course his suits against the 11(thus far) women claiming physical abuse.

Or, as it appears from reading on here, the ONLY issue he has is hate for Clinton..

Lots of choices...check Breitbart and see what Steve wants discussed but he ONLY discusses birth certicates and the like

Please be sure to supply like responses for Clinton's positions on all the above for a good comparison.

I think when posters demand going after Trump for whatever and completely ignoring Clinton's position or lack of one is some what degrading/ignoring of real perspectives. As well as tainting credibility.

Are you serious. You must be listening Tony he propaganda media if you think Trump has not discussed these at a policy level which any leader knows is where you start. Don't recall any discussion on the left about ther ideas. As far as economics most economists are Dems. Here is what most non political types believe because the down economy has hit them directly. Top Economist Reveals THIS About Donald Trump's Plan, People Deserve to Know

If it's on the Internet it must be true. If it is on wikileaks it must be gospel

yes when not denied

Originally Posted by Guest

Are you serious. You must be listening Tony he propaganda media if you think Trump has not discussed these at a policy level which any leader knows is where you start. Don't recall any discussion on the left about ther ideas. As far as economics most economists are Dems. Here is what most non political types believe because the down economy has hit them directly. Top Economist Reveals THIS About Donald Trump's Plan, People Deserve to Know

OK....let me begin by saying linking me to ANGRYPATRIOTMOVEMENT.COM sort of tells me a lot and validates my point made a few times about the use of extremist websites, but anyway......I did read it because I have enough respect for anyone to listen to their point of view.

He is first linked to your site from BRIETBART...which speaks volumes and speaks of Obamacare and continues the carping on Clinton continuing Obama policies. It does NOT detail or discuss any specific policies proposed by either candidate. Thus, I am not sure what you got from it but ...

So.....I choose a few economist sites that I KNOW are conservative.

The first comes from FISCAL TIMES...certainly conservative. They begin the linked article by citing two folks who like the plan a little, not a lot but a little and they offer their grade based on many "maybes" then they go on...

"As it turns out, the effects of Trump’s trade policies are expected to do most of the heavy lifting, adding an estimated $1.74 trillion in additional tax revenue to the US Treasury over the space of 10 years.

The problem is that when economists and international trade experts not affiliated with the Trump campaign started reading it, they were not impressed. “Nonsense,” an economist from the Tax Foundation called it. Another from the CATO Institute tweeted out the hashtag #WeAreAllDoomed. A conservative Canadian financial columnist warned a colleague not even to try reading it, saying, “you will poke your eyes out with hot spikes.”

Commentators took special exception to Navarro’s and Ross’s discussion of the nature of the country’s Gross Domestic Product and its relationship with the trade deficit.


They make this comment on his constant harping on trade....

"While Trump might have the authority to pull the US out of the WTO, he could not unilaterally change the country’s existing tariff laws. However, said Lincicome, US withdrawal “would permit every other trading partner in the world to unilaterally block US exports, unilaterally infringe on US intellectual property.”

You can read it yourself but its headline says it all...

"Conservative Economists Mock Trump Campaign’s Trade Proposals"

Conservative Economists Mock Trump Campaign’s Trade Proposals | The Fiscal Times

Then on to the Wall St Journal...conservative for sure

"A new analysis concludes Donald Trump’s economic proposals, taken at face value, could produce a prolonged recession and heavy job losses that would fall hardest on low- and middle-income workers."

That is how it starts and downhill from there....

U.S. Economy Would Be ‘Diminished’ Under Trump’s Economic Plan, New Analysis Says - Real Time Economics - WSJ

The ECONOMIST....

"Donald Trump’s sums do not add up"

What plan?: Donald Trump’s sums do not add up | The Economist

THUS please do not try and ridicule me on what I read. I read a lot and every day. Trumps plans do change almost daily so you need to stay up on them.

He is speaking in nothing but platitudes to you and his followers.

I choke, as a W Penna guy when I hear how he will save the coal mines and bring back steel production. And none of you question him how in the world he can possible even get close to making something like that happen...IT IS IMPOSSIBLE.

Originally Posted by Guest

Please be sure to supply like responses for Clinton's positions on all the above for a good comparison.

I think when posters demand going after Trump for whatever and completely ignoring Clinton's position or lack of one is some what degrading/ignoring of real perspectives. As well as tainting credibility.

I, in fact do those comparisons....a few for you...

"WASHINGTON — The stark choice that Hillary Clinton and Donald J. Trump pose for voters goes as well for their revised tax plans: Mr. Trump would simplify the tax code but cut taxes mainly for the rich and add trillions of dollars to the federal debt, while Mrs. Clinton would do the opposite, an independent analysis released Tuesday concluded.

The review by the Tax Policy Center, a joint research arm of the Brookings Institution and the Urban Institute, is the first to examine the plans since Mr. Trump significantly rewrote his proposal after criticisms of its costs and inequities and Mrs. Clinton on Monday proposed to double the existing tax break for parents with young children.

“They really couldn’t be more different,” Len Burman, director of the center and a professor at Syracuse University, said in a conference call with reporters.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/12/us...nton.html?_r=0

FORTUNE MAGAZINE did this comparison and said...

"Donald Trump's Tax Plan Could Cost the U.S. 11 Million Jobs"

So this might get you started. Both do in depth comparison of what they propose

Originally Posted by Guest

Please be sure to supply like responses for Clinton's positions on all the above for a good comparison.

I think when posters demand going after Trump for whatever and completely ignoring Clinton's position or lack of one is some what degrading/ignoring of real perspectives. As well as tainting credibility.

I do not ignore. I read and have read.

I have posted on both of them and each time simply get snarky anever really discuss the actual issue.

Believe me, I have done my due diligence on both, and think Trump is insane and agree with his ghost writer...

"If Trump is elected President, he warned, “the millions of people who voted for him and believe that he represents their interests will learn what anyone who deals closely with him already knows—that he couldn’t care less about them.” ♦