Lawsuit Verdict for LLC Lawsuit Verdict for LLC - Talk of The Villages Florida

Lawsuit Verdict for LLC

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-05-2017, 08:33 AM
Kahuna32162's Avatar
Kahuna32162 Kahuna32162 is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,244
Thanks: 109
Thanked 402 Times in 161 Posts
Default Lawsuit Verdict for LLC

this is from the Orlando paper in their Lake County section this morning. This was from an Commentary piece written by Lauren Ritchie.

"Whack! An Orlando jury ruled that the college, run by The Villages Charter School, had to provide interpreters for the deaf in a trial that “probably cost millions” to defend, according to one of the winning lawyers.

Jurors awarded 21 of the 30 plaintiffs a total of $212,000, a different amount for each person who deliberately was denied help U.S. law requires schools to provide when accepting federal funds, as the charter school does. The jury wisely didn’t buy the poor-mouth whining that The Villages couldn’t afford it. That’s pretty much a joke in a place where the owners are fabulously wealthy."

Didn't see anything about this in the Daily Sun....go figure.
__________________
Mark & Linnae
Birmingham, The U.P., Saginaw, Bay City, Toledo, Columbus, Dayton
& The Village of Chatham

"I wish I didn't know now, what I didn't know then"
-Bob Seger-

Last edited by Kahuna32162; 03-05-2017 at 08:40 AM.
  #2  
Old 03-05-2017, 09:19 AM
circletrack circletrack is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 287
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kahuna32162 View Post
this is from the Orlando paper in their Lake County section this morning. This was from an Commentary piece written by Lauren Ritchie.

"Whack! An Orlando jury ruled that the college, run by The Villages Charter School, had to provide interpreters for the deaf in a trial that “probably cost millions” to defend, according to one of the winning lawyers.

Jurors awarded 21 of the 30 plaintiffs a total of $212,000, a different amount for each person who deliberately was denied help U.S. law requires schools to provide when accepting federal funds, as the charter school does. The jury wisely didn’t buy the poor-mouth whining that The Villages couldn’t afford it. That’s pretty much a joke in a place where the owners are fabulously wealthy."

Didn't see anything about this in the Daily Sun....go figure.
Actually it was in the local page of the Sun the day after the ruling weeks ago. And was discussed in the main learning college thread.
  #3  
Old 03-05-2017, 12:59 PM
Polar Bear Polar Bear is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,671
Thanks: 222
Thanked 952 Times in 382 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kahuna32162 View Post
...The jury wisely didn’t buy the poor-mouth whining that The Villages couldn’t afford it. That’s pretty much a joke in a place where the owners are fabulously wealthy."...
The fact that the owners are "fabulously wealthy" has little or nothing to do with the legitimacy of the plaintiffs' claims.

No joke IMHO.
  #4  
Old 03-05-2017, 01:23 PM
graciegirl's Avatar
graciegirl graciegirl is online now
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40,170
Thanks: 5,009
Thanked 5,783 Times in 2,004 Posts
Send a message via AIM to graciegirl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polar Bear View Post
The fact that the owners are "fabulously wealthy" has little or nothing to do with the legitimacy of the plaintiffs' claims.

No joke IMHO.
You are right as usual and for the record.........

I am NOT a Lauren Ritchie fan.
__________________
It is better to laugh than to cry.
  #5  
Old 03-05-2017, 01:42 PM
EnglishJW's Avatar
EnglishJW EnglishJW is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: The Villages
Posts: 614
Thanks: 436
Thanked 100 Times in 37 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kahuna32162 View Post
this is from the Orlando paper in their Lake County section this morning. This was from an Commentary piece written by Lauren Ritchie.

"Whack! An Orlando jury ruled that the college, run by The Villages Charter School, had to provide interpreters for the deaf in a trial that “probably cost millions” to defend, according to one of the winning lawyers.

Jurors awarded 21 of the 30 plaintiffs a total of $212,000, a different amount for each person who deliberately was denied help U.S. law requires schools to provide when accepting federal funds, as the charter school does. The jury wisely didn’t buy the poor-mouth whining that The Villages couldn’t afford it. That’s pretty much a joke in a place where the owners are fabulously wealthy."

Didn't see anything about this in the Daily Sun....go figure.
Is the writer of this commentary at all familiar with The Villages? The statement that the "owners are fabulously wealthy" is uninformed, naive or purposefully deceitful. Sure, like any community, there are wealthy people here in TV. That is hardly the case for everyone that lives here.

Using the writers point of view, everyone who lives in TV is wealthy. The plaintiffs, I believe, live in TV. Ergo, the fabulously wealthy plaintiffs could have brought interpreters with them whenever and wherever they wanted. Right?
__________________
Garden Staters
  #6  
Old 03-05-2017, 01:55 PM
thelegges's Avatar
thelegges thelegges is offline
Sage
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Drayton Plains, MI, Vietnam, Waterford, MI, Pennacamp, Fernandina, Duval, 1 retired in Richmond
Posts: 2,700
Thanks: 17
Thanked 1,940 Times in 768 Posts
Default

We are fabulously wealthy, maybe not all in a monitory way. We are wealthy in the fact that we live in this fabulous community. We are happy to explain how great this community is, how our family and friends who come to visit are in awe of how active our life is. Sometimes when someone has negative comments our TV, I just have to wonder if they are just a little jealous
  #7  
Old 03-05-2017, 03:34 PM
Wiserbud47 Wiserbud47 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 217
Thanks: 1
Thanked 104 Times in 26 Posts
Default

The question I have is who will be responsible to pay the $212,000? The homes owners? The Charter School? Others?
  #8  
Old 03-05-2017, 04:08 PM
Villageswimmer Villageswimmer is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,917
Thanks: 2
Thanked 750 Times in 260 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiserbud47 View Post
The question I have is who will be responsible to pay the $212,000? The homes owners? The Charter School? Others?
Perhaps the more important question is who pays the lawyers? My guess is the $212k pales compared with legal fees. I'd assume the Charter School is on the hook. Very sad.
  #9  
Old 03-05-2017, 04:35 PM
kstew43 kstew43 is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,130
Thanks: 184
Thanked 60 Times in 24 Posts
Default

I think by "the villages" they meant the developers are wealthy....not the actual residents. My opinion anyway.
  #10  
Old 03-05-2017, 04:37 PM
Villageswimmer Villageswimmer is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,917
Thanks: 2
Thanked 750 Times in 260 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kstew43 View Post
I think by "the villages" they meant the developers are wealthy....not the actual residents. My opinion anyway.
Agree.
  #11  
Old 03-05-2017, 08:36 PM
villagetinker's Avatar
villagetinker villagetinker is offline
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Village of Pinellas
Posts: 11,100
Thanks: 3
Thanked 8,231 Times in 2,992 Posts
Default

While I am by no means a legal expert, as I recall there was no allowance for 'legal fees', so I would guess the original plaintiffs are on the hook, or the lawyers just ate the cost. I will leave this to others to analyze and provide additional comments.
If this is true, yes the plaintiffs won, but they essentially won nothing, yes, going forward the new LLLC will need to be more careful to stay within the law, but IMHO this was a good outcome, unless I am missing something......
__________________
Pennsylvania, for 60+ years, most recently, Allentown, now TV.
  #12  
Old 03-05-2017, 09:43 PM
saratogaman saratogaman is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 500
Thanks: 29
Thanked 130 Times in 31 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by villagetinker View Post
While I am by no means a legal expert, as I recall there was no allowance for 'legal fees', so I would guess the original plaintiffs are on the hook, or the lawyers just ate the cost. I will leave this to others to analyze and provide additional comments.
If this is true, yes the plaintiffs won, but they essentially won nothing, yes, going forward the new LLLC will need to be more careful to stay within the law, but IMHO this was a good outcome, unless I am missing something......
Oh, but the plaintiffs did win something...the right to hear what presenters of the courses are saying to the others in the class that can hear. It's a long-established right under USA law.
Adhering to law is not like eating in a cafeteria. You don't get to pick and choose the laws to follow. The laws apply to everyone all of the time. Thank heaven for the courts and the judicial process. Now everyone has access to the classes.
And those attorneys are to be credited for their work...how much they earn is irrelevant to the discrimination they were able to block.
  #13  
Old 03-06-2017, 03:09 AM
Mrs. Robinson Mrs. Robinson is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: The Villages
Posts: 944
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kstew43 View Post
I think by "the villages" they meant the developers are wealthy....not the actual residents. My opinion anyway.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Villageswimmer View Post
Agree.
I agree, also.
I think that has been misunderstood and feel that part of the comment refers directly to the Morses, et al.
__________________
If the broom fits, ride it!
  #14  
Old 03-06-2017, 03:13 AM
Mrs. Robinson Mrs. Robinson is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: The Villages
Posts: 944
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiserbud47 View Post
The question I have is who will be responsible to pay the $212,000? The homes owners? The Charter School? Others?
Good question!

Who can the residents ask and get an honest answer regarding the $212,000 and the attorney fees???
__________________
If the broom fits, ride it!
  #15  
Old 03-06-2017, 04:54 AM
rubicon rubicon is offline
Email Reported As Spam
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 13,694
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
Default

Too many residents favor The Villages of Lake-Sumter Inc (TVLSI) (Developer) to their detriment. They are a corporation and while some may love a corporation, a corporation is incapable of loving back.

I explained in another LLC thread that the LLC violated federal law and the LLC lawyers should have settled this case immediately. Instead they foolishly spent our money defending this case. I'll wager the lawsuit expenses paid by the plaintiffs was paltry compared to what our lawyers charged us.

TVLSI has a nasty habit of creating legal issues but has the capacity and power to shift the monetary burden onto residents.

Just because people like me taking unpopular positions, it doesn't mean we are wrong. I know Randy McDaniel head of the Charter Schools. he is a great guy but he has his marching orders too and I believe he was told to march
Closed Thread

Tags
jury, charter, school, provide, villages


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:10 PM.