[EPutnam1863]

Originally Posted by golfing eagles

I suppose if they paid a SMALL rent, ie: less than the going rate, the case could be made that the Charter School was subsidizing the LLC and hence using Federal funds. Very weak in my mind, but remember, you don't get justice in a court of law, you get law in a court of law

Yes, both Carla B and Golfing Eagles are correct. The lawyers blew it; they should have scrutinized such laws more closely.

This is one problem with ADA; we are conditioned to think of the physically disabled but forget the other groups such as the deaf, the blind, the mentally retarded, etc.

[EPutnam1863]

Originally Posted by Two Bills

At least these who received a settlement, wil be able to afford the latest enhanced hearing aids.

What makes you think that they will benefit from enhanced hearing aids? Doesn't it ever occur to you that there are some who are 100% deaf?

To analogize, we know that not all physically disabled benefit from crutches or canes.

[cologal]

Originally Posted by kstew43

But in the end....

the hearing impaired got their point across....that
"they needed help hearing in some of the classes offered"

and I would hope that this fact was their ultimate goal.

Whatever they wanted we will never know because nothing offered was enough!