I tried to edit the typo in the heading but was unable...it should read M. Obama.

http://www.whitehousedossier.com/201...eks-3-backers/

With the biggest campaign war chest of any POTUS she needs to put the arm on "the little people".

Don't attack the medium presenting the issue, but that it happened.

I don't think current politicians, any of them, know or even care about being discreet.

Michelle Obama certainly hasn't since day one of rolling into the WH.

Real leaders set the tone by example...therefore nothing more needs to be said.

btk

I read all the comments. I think the people are upset!!

The reported email from Michelle Obama is a complete hoax. It is just one political blogger trying to get more hits on his blog for advertisement payments.

Get on to some real issues instead of this type of blog review.

are his children next????

Originally Posted by billethkid

I tried to edit the typo in the heading but was unable...it should read M. Obama.

http://www.whitehousedossier.com/201...eks-3-backers/

With the biggest campaign war chest of any POTUS she needs to put the arm on "the little people".

Don't attack the medium presenting the issue, but that it happened.

I don't think current politicians, any of them, know or even care about being discreet.

Michelle Obama certainly hasn't since day one of rolling into the WH.

Real leaders set the tone by example...therefore nothing more needs to be said.

btk

Some people are really totally gullible - it's not for real folks. Check facts and the source pleeease. Just because it's on the Internet doesn't make it true. Can't you find anything that could be more of a fabrication?

OK so I picked a bad one.....exxxxxxuuuuuuuse ME!

It is so nice to see you all keep the tar and feathers so handy.

One bad post out of thousands and the avalanche of sarcasm and snipping comes forth....

I fear I have tread where perfection abounds

btk

Cons are not concerned with what is true or how accurate a statement is - or isn't - before they cut and paste something. To a con anything posted on a website or stated in a blog is a fact.

What is even sadder than that, is they somehow feel they need to post made up stuff about the First Lady. Guess, it makes them feel tough and macho by picking on the Firsty Lady. Like that congressman from Wisconsin (I think he is from), Jim Sensibrenner (sp), who made derogatory remarks about the size of the First Lady's posterior - this coming from an extremely obese guy.

Seeing as how this administration has gotten rid of Bin Laden and dozens of other Al Queada operatives - something the previous one couldn't do - and seeing as how Obama just took Boehner and Cantor to school, what else do the cons have left but to pick on The First Lady.

Oh what a relief it must be to get all that disparagement out of ones mouth!!

PS....so there MAY be a question of the validity of the info as it was presented via a blog....

My commentary on the insensitivity still stands....as evidenced by past behavior noted by anybody around the world that can read.

btk

Originally Posted by billethkid

Oh what a relief it must be to get all that disparagement out of ones mouth!!

PS....so there MAY be a question of the validity of the info as it was presented via a blog....

My commentary on the insensitivity still stands....as evidenced by past behavior noted by anybody around the world that can read.

btk

Not to worry BTK...it happens. There are hundreds of phoney stories out there on both side. The silence from one side on this issue is deafening.

There have been, over the years, so many of these things put out about President Bush it became a profession to come up with them and they were posted on here and other forums as facts, and those who posted them NEVER EVER admitted it was an error, BUT YOU DID and people do make mistakes.

why is it that some can bring up Bush and when others do we get thats past history crap,it's time to move on. Just saying.

Even if this weren't a hoax....so what? Doesn't every candidate [and their spouses] solicit donations ???

This is how our political system works.

Of course, candidates and their spouses solicit political donations. However, the underlying message was to make non-thinking people believe that Mrs. Obama was squeezing $3 donations while, herself, was taking a $4 million vacation paid for by taxpayers.

It is amazing how these political bloggers make so much money from just having a following of drones who click on their blogs - and advertisers pay a few cents per click. It really adds up over a short time.

Originally Posted by buggyone

Of course, candidates and their spouses solicit political donations. However, the underlying message was to make non-thinking people believe that Mrs. Obama was squeezing $3 donations while, herself, was taking a $4 million vacation paid for by taxpayers.

It is amazing how these political bloggers make so much money from just having a following of drones who click on their blogs - and advertisers pay a few cents per click. It really adds up over a short time.

Whatever the outcome of this reported story, The Obama's did indeed bask in the extravagance of a luxurious 4 million dollar Hawaiian getaway at the expense of the American public, and they are also trolling for donations to their campaign to extend their stay in "the people's house".

There can be no denying of anything I've written above.

I do like how some of you have forgotten the outright lie of the original post and continue to deflect away from it. And not even an apology for the false post that without Buggy research would have been believed by some. Shame on you. But why should we expect anything else?

...and the highest cost of the trip was Air Force One as well as security for the First Family. It is no different than any other President.

While it might be an amusing thought to have the President and all of Congress make all their flights on Southwest Airlines and go through TSA security checks with the rest of us, they will continue to have Air Force One no matter who is president.