Big surprise in Nov.? Big surprise in Nov.? - Talk of The Villages Florida

Big surprise in Nov.?

 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-17-2012, 02:52 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default Big surprise in Nov.?

Had lunch today with a friend who is in his early 30s and was a obama supporter.Asked if he was supporting again and said nope.Went on to tell me they did a poll of college friends of more then 200 .Last election more then 2 to 1 obama supporters.This poll 4 yep thats correct 4 people others Romney.The main reason is they all feel he lied to them and has done nothing of what he promised. I was shocked.
  #2  
Old 07-17-2012, 03:05 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Here's another big surprise. Senator John McCain said today that he picked Sarah Palin over Mitt Romney for vice president because she was the better candidate. Really? Is John McCain working for President Obama?


John McCain: I Didn’t Pick Romney Because ‘Sarah Palin Was The Better Candidate’ | TPM2012
  #3  
Old 07-17-2012, 03:05 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Don't count on a lot of that conversion to common sense, O.P. Most students are taking out student loans and deferring the interest until they're out of school. Often the payment is $1200 or more a month----more than what they need for a car and rent payments, and they're not able to find a job in their degree field.

Obama and friends in the Ivory Tower keep telling them they are OWED a college education paid by somebody else (you and me). And now this week, he has told them that they won't "have to build" (as in WORK it) that small business idea/plan themselves......"somebody else does that for you!".

Many people under age 35 now believe there IS a Santa Claus and there IS a "free lunch".
  #4  
Old 07-17-2012, 03:59 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

doesn't mean she was a more capable candidate. Just that for what he wanted to accomplish, like the female vote, the independents etc, she was the better candidate. That was then for what he wanted.

Has nothing to do with Romney's ability to be POTUS, unless that was one of the talking points issued today.

That was then this is now. Romney vs Obama is the issue and Romney is the better candidate to get this country out of the rut it is in.

And please no more Bain or tax returns....neither of which have anything to do with capability.

btk
  #5  
Old 07-17-2012, 04:11 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by billethkid View Post
doesn't mean she was a more capable candidate. Just that for what he wanted to accomplish, like the female vote, the independents etc, she was the better candidate. That was then for what he wanted.

Has nothing to do with Romney's ability to be POTUS, unless that was one of the talking points issued today.

That was then this is now. Romney vs Obama is the issue and Romney is the better candidate to get this country out of the rut it is in.

And please no more Bain or tax returns....neither of which have anything to do with capability.

btk
While your last sentence may be valid and make sense...

"And please no more Bain or tax returns....neither of which have anything to do with capability."

It aint gonna happen.....Obama's group will not stop....they are already preparing to debunk Romney the man on the olympics !!! It is amazing it is truely community organizer at its best...attack the man...the h#$$ with issues.
  #6  
Old 07-17-2012, 04:29 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by billethkid View Post
doesn't mean she was a more capable candidate. Just that for what he wanted to accomplish, like the female vote, the independents etc, she was the better candidate. That was then for what he wanted.

Has nothing to do with Romney's ability to be POTUS, unless that was one of the talking points issued today.

That was then this is now. Romney vs Obama is the issue and Romney is the better candidate to get this country out of the rut it is in.

And please no more Bain or tax returns....neither of which have anything to do with capability.

btk
Guess that didn't work out too well with the female vote, the independents, etc. Bain or tax returns....might not have anything to do with capability, but they sure have everything to do with credibility and honesty.
  #7  
Old 07-17-2012, 04:39 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hdh1470 View Post
Had lunch today with a friend who is in his early 30s and was a obama supporter.Asked if he was supporting again and said nope.Went on to tell me they did a poll of college friends of more then 200 .Last election more then 2 to 1 obama supporters.This poll 4 yep thats correct 4 people others Romney.The main reason is they all feel he lied to them and has done nothing of what he promised. I was shocked.
If they can eliminate the unqualified voters then Romney would win in a landslide.
  #8  
Old 07-17-2012, 05:07 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucco View Post
While your last sentence may be valid and make sense...

"And please no more Bain or tax returns....neither of which have anything to do with capability."

It aint gonna happen.....Obama's group will not stop....they are already preparing to debunk Romney the man on the olympics !!! It is amazing it is truely community organizer at its best...attack the man...the h#$$ with issues.
Hey, if Romney is not HONEST enough to release his tax returns or HONEST enough to have his Bain Capital history scrutinized - he is not HONEST enough to be President of the USA. The man must be hiding something BIG.
  #9  
Old 07-17-2012, 05:18 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You don't trust the I R S,You seem to trust government to provide every thing else for you.
  #10  
Old 07-17-2012, 05:19 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by buggyone View Post
Hey, if Romney is not HONEST enough to release his tax returns or HONEST enough to have his Bain Capital history scrutinized - he is not HONEST enough to be President of the USA. The man must be hiding something BIG.
Explain please what Mitt Romney is doing or has done that was dishonest ????

Quite a charge...similiar to the Obama campaign and I would like to respectfully ask you to substantiate your claim of Romney not being honest ?

You may find it just a throw away line or something but a serious charge..back it up please !

Do not change the subject or use a lot of words..just simply state what he is doing or has done that is DISHONEST ? Thanks
  #11  
Old 07-17-2012, 05:20 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I find most of these post laughable.
  #12  
Old 07-17-2012, 06:22 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

We still have a long way to go before elections begin. I suspect some voters know now to whom the will vote while others are still gathering information. As for polls well most are created to be self serving.
  #13  
Old 07-17-2012, 11:42 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I hope the lefties just keep on laughing.

A Romney landslide would not be a surprise to me. I'm not saying it's going to be one, but it's not looking like an impossible thing.
  #14  
Old 07-18-2012, 06:51 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaleMN View Post
I find most of these post laughable.
I agree...this one seems to fit that bill!



Quote:
Hey, if Romney is not HONEST enough to release his tax returns or HONEST enough to have his Bain Capital history scrutinized - he is not HONEST enough to be President of the USA. The man must be hiding something BIG.
Yesterday 05:39 PM
  #15  
Old 07-18-2012, 09:03 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shimpy View Post
If they can eliminate the unqualified voters then Romney would win in a landslide.
And your definition of "unqualified voters" is..................
 


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:30 PM.