Why Obama will lose in a landslide. Why Obama will lose in a landslide. - Talk of The Villages Florida

Why Obama will lose in a landslide.

 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-07-2012, 01:44 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why Obama will lose in a landslide.

Food for thought.

Why Obama Will Lose in a Landslide - Wayne Allyn Root - [page]
  #2  
Old 08-07-2012, 01:50 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Wayne Allyn Root - a Tea Party favorite.... LOL ......... 'nuff said ........
  #3  
Old 08-07-2012, 02:00 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default Too early to tell whom these groups will vote for in November.

Why Obama Will Lose in a Landslide - Wayne Allyn Root - [page]

He makes some good arguments but based on very little evidence. Most of the TOTVers also seemed to have chosen Mitt Romney as the favorite of the Republican party early on in the Primaries.
  #4  
Old 08-07-2012, 02:14 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default dklassen

You may have to eat those little words!



Quote:
Originally Posted by dklassen View Post
  #5  
Old 08-07-2012, 02:17 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Charlie Cook, the renowned pollster, said this morning on Morning Joe that President Obama is leading in 11 of 12 toss-up states, even though the national numbers might look close. It's hard to see how Mitt Romney turns this around.
  #6  
Old 08-07-2012, 02:36 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I truly hope you guys are bookmarking this post. Let's revisit in Nov shall we?
  #7  
Old 08-07-2012, 03:31 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dklassen View Post
Thanks for posting this column. I am going to share it with others. His logic makes perfect sense. "Add it up. Is there one major group where Obama has gained since 2008? Will anyone in America wake up on election day saying 'I didn’t vote for Obama 4 years ago. But he’s done such a fantastic job, I can’t wait to vote for him today.' Does anyone feel that a vote for Obama makes their job more secure?"
  #8  
Old 08-07-2012, 03:35 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by coralway View Post
Wayne Allyn Root - a Tea Party favorite.... LOL ......... 'nuff said ........
Tea Party candidates are winning election after election. To discount something with the myopic phrase "Tea Party 'nuff said" shows how out of touch you are with the political currents.

It's please me to no end. Stay unfocused my friend.
  #9  
Old 08-07-2012, 03:36 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by janmcn View Post
Charlie Cook, the renowned pollster, said this morning on Morning Joe that President Obama is leading in 11 of 12 toss-up states, even though the national numbers might look close. It's hard to see how Mitt Romney turns this around.
didn't someone there also comment that if the votes for obama lessen by as little a 1% - 2% that he could lose the states based on the %age by which he won last time? or was that on fox! i gotta stop channel surfing or fox and msnbc gotta redo their time slots! no - i don't have dvr service!
  #10  
Old 08-07-2012, 03:46 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by njbchbum View Post
didn't someone there also comment that if the votes for obama lessen by as little a 1% - 2% that he could lose the states based on the %age by which he won last time? or was that on fox! i gotta stop channel surfing or fox and msnbc gotta redo their time slots! no - i don't have dvr service!
The only thing I heard on MSNBC about 1% to 2%, was Charlie Cook said that picking Senator Rob Portman as VP might help Mitt Romney gain 1 to 2 points in Ohio, which Romney desperately needs to win.
  #11  
Old 08-07-2012, 03:52 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dklassen View Post
Don't bet the farm....or your bunker....on it.
  #12  
Old 08-07-2012, 03:59 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaleMN View Post
Don't bet the farm....or your bunker....on it.
I may need a bunker if Mitt Romney wins.
  #13  
Old 08-07-2012, 03:59 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Post

It's shocking that so many posters on this forum don't mind seeing their taxes go up by up to $2000 per year, according to the report that came out by the Tax Policy Institute last week, not to pay down the debt or for more defense but so that Mitt Romney and other millionaires can reduce their taxes by $87,000 annually.

It's also beyond shocking that so many don't mind ending Medicare as we know it, but instead have a voucher system that will cost each of us an additional $6000 per year.

Personally $8000 per year is more than I can afford. Others must feel like easy come, easy go.
  #14  
Old 08-07-2012, 04:20 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by janmcn View Post
It's shocking that so many posters on this forum don't mind seeing their taxes go up by up to $2000 per year, according to the report that came out by the Tax Policy Institute last week, not to pay down the debt or for more defense but so that Mitt Romney and other millionaires can reduce their taxes by $87,000 annually.

It's also beyond shocking that so many don't mind ending Medicare as we know it, but instead have a voucher system that will cost each of us an additional $6000 per year.

Personally $8000 per year is more than I can afford. Others must feel like easy come, easy go.
This post is a real example of what happens when you totally immerse yourself into what Obama says....you believe anything, like transparency, deficit reduction, leadership, etc.

PS....have you actually read the report ? I have.....President Obama takes great liberty ! By the way, in addition to the bias of the authors, the numbers were just simply numbers that they put in based on nothing at all. As you yourself have said, he has not given anything specific !
  #15  
Old 08-07-2012, 04:57 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It is curious that the article cited did not include an opinion on one of the more serious demographic voting blocks. The Asian-American community is the most educated and take voting more seriously than any other group yet they were not mentioned in this article. and they are growing expotentially in numbers. Where do they stand? I speculate that such a highly educated group unnderstands economic well and knows the difference between facts and hyperbole. Based on that criteria you fill in whom you believe they will turn to?
 


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 PM.