Arrests in historic area of TV Arrests in historic area of TV - Page 2 - Talk of The Villages Florida

Arrests in historic area of TV

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 10-09-2014, 09:53 PM
Didiwinbob's Avatar
Didiwinbob Didiwinbob is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Liberty Prk
Posts: 201
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Onslowe- I have noticed the people being arrested are under 50 yrs. not liking this
__________________
Chris
  #17  
Old 10-09-2014, 09:55 PM
sunnyatlast sunnyatlast is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: The Villages, FL
Posts: 1,208
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Well, some criticized in another thread that the developer buying up 40+ dilapidated, tear-down homes in TV's original section, and building new villas and ranch/cottage homes on them (for around $200,000) would price lower income people out of TV.

If the tear-down, dilapidated homes are left there, it will only attract more of a bad element like the ones arrested, it seems to me. I don't think you can have it both ways. It's either tear down and revitalize, or let the area go downhill with more of the likes of these arrestees attracted to the lower prices/rent on the run-down properties.
  #18  
Old 10-10-2014, 10:14 AM
Rango Rango is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 744
Thanks: 275
Thanked 112 Times in 52 Posts
Default

Out on $2000 Bail.
  #19  
Old 10-11-2014, 07:07 AM
Advogado Advogado is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,032
Thanks: 62
Thanked 685 Times in 229 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=onslowe;950728]Can someone tell me if the 80/20 rule as to age refers to the property owners or to the occupiers (renters, owners)?


The law is explained here. Complying with the 80% rule enables us to discriminate against families with children under the age of 18. Otherwise, such discrimination is illegal.

Senior Housing - HUD
  #20  
Old 10-11-2014, 08:20 AM
Dr Winston O Boogie jr's Avatar
Dr Winston O Boogie jr Dr Winston O Boogie jr is offline
Sage
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7,940
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2,157 Times in 772 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by njbchbum View Post
My limited research indicates that Privada Dr is not in the historic section; but the house at that address lists an older couple in their 70s as the owners; this Wagner might be their son? If so, would seem that losers live in other villages neighborhoods, too!

Records do not show either of the residents of Teakwood Lane as owners of #2795 - so they must be renters?
I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure that the arrests happened in the historic district. In fact, I think that I witnessed them. I was driving my golf cart on Wednesday and noticed several police cars in the area. As I went across Shay, I saw three or four police cars that had two golf carts pulled over. A few bystanders were standing by watching. I didn't go down to see what was going on but it looked very peculiar to me. As I made my way over to the golf cart bridge, I saw three or four more police cars driving around. They were both Lady Lake and County Sheriff cars.

I've been saying for a while now that there is a group of people here that are frightening. The police know who they are and have been slowly getting them off the streets. I believe that the people in the sex on the utility box were part of this group.The people who stole the beer from the Circle K and the ones who stole the golf clubs from the Circle K parking lot are also part of the same group that also includes the people running the golf cart chop shop.

The police went through a lot to get these folks. According to the article, Drug detection K-9s and laser speed enforcement were among some of the techniques utilized during this operation. Two of the people were arrested for driving without a license. How many times have you heard of people being arrested for that. It's usually a ticket and they tow your car. And that seems like an awful lot of police work for driving without a license.

The other guy was nabbed for a gun violation and drug possession while on probation. He's probably in big trouble.

The other thing that was mentioned was that the arrests were prompted by complaints from residents in this area of illegal activity.

We have a criminal gang operating here and it's good to see that the police are taking action to eliminate them.
__________________
The Beatlemaniacs of The Villages meet every Friday 10:00am at the O'Dell Recreation Center.

"I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as cause for withdrawing from a friend." - Thomas Jefferson to William Hamilton, April 22, 1800.
  #21  
Old 10-11-2014, 08:52 AM
GatorFan GatorFan is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Villages
Posts: 766
Thanks: 12
Thanked 24 Times in 15 Posts
Default

I must have missed something. What were they doing that caused someone to call the police. Charged with driving on suspended license? Had a gun in the house? Not trying to be smart or anything. Just wondering why someone called the police?

Last edited by GatorFan; 10-11-2014 at 08:54 AM. Reason: Spelling
  #22  
Old 10-11-2014, 09:04 AM
janmcn janmcn is offline
Sage
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,298
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorFan View Post
I must have missed something. What were they doing that caused someone to call the police. Charged with driving on suspended license? Had a gun in the house? Not trying to be smart or anything. Just wondering why someone called the police?
Stolen golf carts, other complaints lead to Villages police operation - Daily Commercial: News

It sounds like this group had been under surveillance by the police after numerous complaints by neighbors.
  #23  
Old 10-11-2014, 10:08 AM
Bigben007 Bigben007 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, Fernandina, 2012
Posts: 155
Thanks: 60
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by onslowe View Post
Can someone tell me if the 80/20 rule as to age refers to the property owners or to the occupiers (renters, owners)?

I am serious. I don't know, but the parade of under 55 yr old arrestees over the past year here does lead me to ask this question.

No flamethrowing needed, just civil discussion please. Thanks everyone.
I wonder the same thing. Most of the DUI's and other arrest have been under 55.
  #24  
Old 10-11-2014, 11:10 AM
Chatbrat Chatbrat is offline
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,410
Thanks: 0
Thanked 987 Times in 384 Posts
Default

I always get a boot of people who disparage renters, if you have a mortgage you're a renter,too---the bank is your landlord
  #25  
Old 10-11-2014, 11:32 AM
onslowe onslowe is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Manhattan, the Bronx, Eastern LI, Village of Woodbury
Posts: 416
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
Default

[quote=Advogado;951260]
Quote:
Originally Posted by onslowe View Post
Can someone tell me if the 80/20 rule as to age refers to the property owners or to the occupiers (renters, owners)?


The law is explained here. Complying with the 80% rule enables us to discriminate against families with children under the age of 18. Otherwise, such discrimination is illegal.

Senior Housing - HUD
Thanks sincerely Avogado. It did answer the question I had. The HUD rules involve 80% of the 'occupiers' of houses, not title owners. Unfortunately, that leaves me with a bad feeling as to the possible abuse of the rule via unchecked rentals.

And those who feel better helping and defending the downtrodden renters from their armchairs, go ahead and have at it. I just know what I bought into and relied upon and agreed to.
  #26  
Old 10-11-2014, 11:41 AM
Challenger's Avatar
Challenger Challenger is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,283
Thanks: 56
Thanked 377 Times in 168 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chatbrat View Post
I always get a boot of people who disparage renters, if you have a mortgage you're a renter,too---the bank is your landlord
Not so!
__________________
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing" Edmund Burke 1729-1797
  #27  
Old 10-11-2014, 01:31 PM
Advogado Advogado is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,032
Thanks: 62
Thanked 685 Times in 229 Posts
Default

[quote=onslowe;951380]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Advogado View Post

Thanks sincerely Avogado. It did answer the question I had. The HUD rules involve 80% of the 'occupiers' of houses, not title owners. Unfortunately, that leaves me with a bad feeling as to the possible abuse of the rule via unchecked rentals.

And those who feel better helping and defending the downtrodden renters from their armchairs, go ahead and have at it. I just know what I bought into and relied upon and agreed to.
I don't think that we are in danger of having more than 20% of the houses without at least one occupant 55 or over. In fact, I don't personally know of any-- although, in theory, it could happen some day. It is a specter that Blechman raises in his attack book, Leisureville. I think that it is highly unlikely in the foreseeable future, however.
  #28  
Old 10-11-2014, 01:44 PM
jbdlfan's Avatar
jbdlfan jbdlfan is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The Villages
Posts: 612
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

[quote=Advogado;951429]
Quote:
Originally Posted by onslowe View Post
I don't think that we are in danger of having more than 20% of the houses without at least one occupant 55 or over. In fact, I don't personally know of any-- although, in theory, it could happen some day. It is a specter that Blechman raises in his attack book, Leisureville. I think that it is highly unlikely in the foreseeable future, however.
I know at least 15 homes OWNED by individuals under 55. Me being one. As far as the culprits being under 50 lately, it is more telling that they are renters than that of their age. Us that are owners of that age, tend to be more concerned about our community than those that don't. I have been a renter here as well as an owner, but in both cases, we took care of ourselves and our home as if we did in fact own it. Sadly, not always the case.
__________________
"Adults are just outdated children."

Dr. Seuss
  #29  
Old 10-11-2014, 01:53 PM
Dr Winston O Boogie jr's Avatar
Dr Winston O Boogie jr Dr Winston O Boogie jr is offline
Sage
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7,940
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2,157 Times in 772 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chatbrat View Post
I always get a boot of people who disparage renters, if you have a mortgage you're a renter,too---the bank is your landlord
That's simply not true. If you have a mortgage, you, not the bank owns the house. If you fail to pay the bank, they have a right to sue to take your property in lieu of repayment of the mortgage. That is a huge difference.
__________________
The Beatlemaniacs of The Villages meet every Friday 10:00am at the O'Dell Recreation Center.

"I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as cause for withdrawing from a friend." - Thomas Jefferson to William Hamilton, April 22, 1800.
  #30  
Old 10-11-2014, 02:00 PM
Dr Winston O Boogie jr's Avatar
Dr Winston O Boogie jr Dr Winston O Boogie jr is offline
Sage
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7,940
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2,157 Times in 772 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigben007 View Post
I wonder the same thing. Most of the DUI's and other arrest have been under 55.
Records are kept by The Villages. They have access to that information through the amenities fees and every person that buys a home or rents signs a disclosure form and an agreement. It is part of the closing procedure.

The law reads that 80% of the homes must be occupied by at least one person over the age of 55. It's entirely possible for 4/5 of the residents here to be under 55 and still be in compliance with the law.

I think that if you look at police records in general, fewer crimes are committed by older people.
__________________
The Beatlemaniacs of The Villages meet every Friday 10:00am at the O'Dell Recreation Center.

"I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as cause for withdrawing from a friend." - Thomas Jefferson to William Hamilton, April 22, 1800.
Closed Thread


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:47 PM.